Coordinating culture change across the research landscape.

Leslie D McIntosh, Cynthia Hudson Vitale
{"title":"Coordinating culture change across the research landscape.","authors":"Leslie D McIntosh,&nbsp;Cynthia Hudson Vitale","doi":"10.3389/frma.2023.1134082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific integrity necessitates applying scientific methods properly, collecting and analyzing data appropriately, protecting human subjects rightly, performing studies rigorously, and communicating findings transparently. But who is responsible for upholding research integrity, mitigating misinformation, and increasing trust in science beyond individual researchers? We posit that supporting the scientific reputation requires a coordinated approach across all stakeholders: funding agencies, publishers, scholarly societies, research institutions, and journalists and media, and policy-makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"8 ","pages":"1134082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1134082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific integrity necessitates applying scientific methods properly, collecting and analyzing data appropriately, protecting human subjects rightly, performing studies rigorously, and communicating findings transparently. But who is responsible for upholding research integrity, mitigating misinformation, and increasing trust in science beyond individual researchers? We posit that supporting the scientific reputation requires a coordinated approach across all stakeholders: funding agencies, publishers, scholarly societies, research institutions, and journalists and media, and policy-makers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协调整个研究领域的文化变革。
科学诚信需要正确应用科学方法,适当收集和分析数据,正确保护人类受试者,严格执行研究,并透明地传达研究结果。但是,谁负责维护研究的完整性,减少错误信息,增加对科学的信任,而不仅仅是对个别研究人员?我们认为,支持科学声誉需要所有利益相关者之间的协调方法:资助机构、出版商、学术协会、研究机构、记者和媒体以及政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping the conceptual structure of research on open innovation in university-industry collaborations: a bibliometric analysis. Characterization of the stress level of university students using data mining algorithms. Digging in or building bridges? A scoping review of thematic analysis. Can AI assess literature like experts? An entropy-based comparison of ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek R1, and human ratings. Navigating the meta-crisis of generativity: adapting qualitative research quality criteria in the era of generative AI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1