Student midwives' perspectives of women's sexual and reproductive health literacy in Turkey

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100864
Sarah Church , Serap Ejder Apay , Ayse Gurol , Yoanna Slaveva , Rhianna Mills
{"title":"Student midwives' perspectives of women's sexual and reproductive health literacy in Turkey","authors":"Sarah Church ,&nbsp;Serap Ejder Apay ,&nbsp;Ayse Gurol ,&nbsp;Yoanna Slaveva ,&nbsp;Rhianna Mills","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study focused on the issues surrounding health literacy in the context of women’s sexual and reproductive health (SRH), the significance and availability of information for midwives and women; and the socio-cultural influences and barriers related to women’s level of health literacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross sectional on-line survey was distributed to 280 student midwives in their 2nd 3rd and 4th year of a midwifery programme. This paper focuses on the responses from 138 students which were analysed using descriptive and non-parametric tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Student midwives indicated their level of agreement regarding women’s ability to access, understand, and appraise information they received verbally and in written form about the six main SRH topics (namely contraception, STIs, abortion, Pap tests and cervical cancer, and fertility and pregnancy), from their midwife but agreement was much lower regarding women’s access to SRH information from peers and their families. False beliefs were ranked as the most common barrier to accessing information and services. Students ranked being a refugee, being from a rural area, being educated to a primary school level or not formally educated, as having the greatest negative impact on women’s health literacy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings from this study indicate the role that the sociocultural background of Islamic culture plays in the disparities in sexual and reproductive health literacy (SRHL) for women from the perspective of student midwives. Our findings indicate the need for future research to focus on women as participants to gain their first-hand experiences of SRHL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187757562300054X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study focused on the issues surrounding health literacy in the context of women’s sexual and reproductive health (SRH), the significance and availability of information for midwives and women; and the socio-cultural influences and barriers related to women’s level of health literacy.

Methods

A cross sectional on-line survey was distributed to 280 student midwives in their 2nd 3rd and 4th year of a midwifery programme. This paper focuses on the responses from 138 students which were analysed using descriptive and non-parametric tests.

Results

Student midwives indicated their level of agreement regarding women’s ability to access, understand, and appraise information they received verbally and in written form about the six main SRH topics (namely contraception, STIs, abortion, Pap tests and cervical cancer, and fertility and pregnancy), from their midwife but agreement was much lower regarding women’s access to SRH information from peers and their families. False beliefs were ranked as the most common barrier to accessing information and services. Students ranked being a refugee, being from a rural area, being educated to a primary school level or not formally educated, as having the greatest negative impact on women’s health literacy.

Conclusions

Findings from this study indicate the role that the sociocultural background of Islamic culture plays in the disparities in sexual and reproductive health literacy (SRHL) for women from the perspective of student midwives. Our findings indicate the need for future research to focus on women as participants to gain their first-hand experiences of SRHL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生助产士对土耳其妇女性健康和生殖健康知识普及的看法
本研究的重点是妇女性健康和生殖健康背景下的健康知识问题,助产士和妇女信息的重要性和可用性;以及与妇女健康知识水平有关的社会文化影响和障碍。方法对280名参加助产课程第二年、第三年和第四年的学生助产士进行横断面在线调查。本文采用描述性和非参数性测试对138名学生的回答进行了分析。结果学生助产士表示,他们对女性获得、理解和评估其口头和书面形式获得的关于六个主要SRH主题(即避孕、性传播感染、堕胎、巴氏检查和宫颈癌症以及生育和怀孕)的信息的能力达成了一致,但在妇女从同龄人及其家人那里获得性健康和生殖健康信息方面的一致性要低得多。虚假信念被列为获取信息和服务的最常见障碍。学生被列为难民、来自农村地区、受过小学教育或未受过正规教育,对妇女的健康素养产生最大负面影响。结论本研究的结果表明,从助产士学生的角度来看,伊斯兰文化的社会文化背景在女性性健康和生殖健康素养(SRHL)差异中发挥了作用。我们的研究结果表明,未来的研究需要将重点放在女性参与者身上,以获得她们对SRHL的第一手经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Investigating the associations between early labour onset symptoms and self-diagnosed labour onset in a cohort study of primiparas Overuse of intrapartum CTG monitoring in low-risk women in Norway Editorial Board The conclusion of CTG overuse is not justified Hysterectomy and medical financial hardship among U.S. women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1