Inter-hospital variation in management of patients with small bowel obstruction in Denmark.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-08-16
Mette Astrup Tolver, Mia Prindahl Ærenlund, Mahmoud Azzam, Trine Bjerke, Jakob Burcharth, Christian Bakholdt Dibbern, Thomas Korgaard Jensen, Jens Qvist Jordhøj, Ida Lolle, Loan Ngo-Stuyt, Emil Ø Nielsen, Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen, Maria Olausson, Anders Peter Skovsen, Henry George Smith
{"title":"Inter-hospital variation in management of patients with small bowel obstruction in Denmark.","authors":"Mette Astrup Tolver,&nbsp;Mia Prindahl Ærenlund,&nbsp;Mahmoud Azzam,&nbsp;Trine Bjerke,&nbsp;Jakob Burcharth,&nbsp;Christian Bakholdt Dibbern,&nbsp;Thomas Korgaard Jensen,&nbsp;Jens Qvist Jordhøj,&nbsp;Ida Lolle,&nbsp;Loan Ngo-Stuyt,&nbsp;Emil Ø Nielsen,&nbsp;Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen,&nbsp;Maria Olausson,&nbsp;Anders Peter Skovsen,&nbsp;Henry George Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inter-hospital variation in the management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been described in other countries, but the extent to which similar variations exist in Denmark remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the management of SBO between hospitals in Denmark and identify potential areas for improvement METHODS. This was a multicentre prospective study performed at six emergency hospitals. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of SBO were eligible for inclusion. The primary study endpoints were the proportion of patients undergoing operative versus non-operative management, laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery and the success rate of non-operative management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 patients were included. No differences were noted in diagnostic pathways or operative versus non-operative management. However, variations were noted in compliance with peri-operative care bundles, ranging from 63.2% to 95.8%. The surgical approach also varied, with the use of laparoscopic surgery ranging from 20.7% to 71.0% (p less-than 0.001). Variations were also noted in duration of surgery (63-124 minutes, p less-than 0.001), time to re-introduction of normal diet and length of hospital stay (3-8.5 days, p less-than 0.001). No differences were observed in 30-day or 90-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The management of SBO in Denmark is relatively standardised. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to multidisciplinary peri-operative protocols, optimising patient selection for laparoscopic surgery and standardising nutritional therapy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04750811.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inter-hospital variation in the management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been described in other countries, but the extent to which similar variations exist in Denmark remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the management of SBO between hospitals in Denmark and identify potential areas for improvement METHODS. This was a multicentre prospective study performed at six emergency hospitals. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of SBO were eligible for inclusion. The primary study endpoints were the proportion of patients undergoing operative versus non-operative management, laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery and the success rate of non-operative management.

Results: A total of 316 patients were included. No differences were noted in diagnostic pathways or operative versus non-operative management. However, variations were noted in compliance with peri-operative care bundles, ranging from 63.2% to 95.8%. The surgical approach also varied, with the use of laparoscopic surgery ranging from 20.7% to 71.0% (p less-than 0.001). Variations were also noted in duration of surgery (63-124 minutes, p less-than 0.001), time to re-introduction of normal diet and length of hospital stay (3-8.5 days, p less-than 0.001). No differences were observed in 30-day or 90-day mortality rates.

Conclusion: The management of SBO in Denmark is relatively standardised. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to multidisciplinary peri-operative protocols, optimising patient selection for laparoscopic surgery and standardising nutritional therapy.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: NCT04750811.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦小肠梗阻患者管理的医院间差异
导读:其他国家对小肠梗阻(SBO)管理的医院间差异进行了描述,但丹麦存在类似差异的程度仍不得而知。本研究旨在比较丹麦各医院对SBO的管理,并确定潜在的改进领域。这是一项在6家急诊医院进行的多中心前瞻性研究。年龄≥18岁且诊断为SBO的患者符合纳入条件。主要研究终点是接受手术与非手术治疗的患者比例,腹腔镜手术与开放手术的比例以及非手术治疗的成功率。结果:共纳入316例患者。在诊断途径或手术与非手术治疗方面没有差异。然而,围手术期护理包的依从性存在差异,从63.2%到95.8%不等。手术入路也各不相同,腹腔镜手术的使用范围从20.7%到71.0% (p < 0.001)。手术时间(63-124分钟,p < 0.001)、恢复正常饮食的时间和住院时间(3-8.5天,p < 0.001)也存在差异。30天和90天的死亡率没有观察到差异。结论:丹麦的SBO管理较为规范。未来的努力应集中在提高多学科围手术期协议的依从性,优化腹腔镜手术的患者选择和标准化营养治疗。资金:没有。试验注册:NCT04750811。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to long-term non-invasive positive airway pressure therapy. The Clinical Frailty Scale to assess patients referred for intensive care therapy. Suture fixation versus tension band wiring in simple displaced olecranon fractures - a study protocol. Physical activity, sedentary time and health - a narrative review with new insights. Operating room team's perception of procedure shift to cemented hemiarthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1