Comparison of Quality of Life and Cosmetic Outcome of Latissimus Dorsi Mini-Flap With Breast Conservation Surgery Without Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e33
Jang-Il Kim, Jong-Ho Cheun, Ji Gwang Jung, Yumi Kim, Changjin Lim, Yireh Han, Sookyoung Jeon, Ki Yong Hong, Han-Byoel Lee, Wonshik Han
{"title":"Comparison of Quality of Life and Cosmetic Outcome of Latissimus Dorsi Mini-Flap With Breast Conservation Surgery Without Reconstruction.","authors":"Jang-Il Kim,&nbsp;Jong-Ho Cheun,&nbsp;Ji Gwang Jung,&nbsp;Yumi Kim,&nbsp;Changjin Lim,&nbsp;Yireh Han,&nbsp;Sookyoung Jeon,&nbsp;Ki Yong Hong,&nbsp;Han-Byoel Lee,&nbsp;Wonshik Han","doi":"10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Latissimus dorsi mini-flap (LDMF) reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a useful volume replacement technique when a large tumor is located in the upper or outer portion of the breast. However, few studies have reported the impact of LDMF on patients' quality of life (QoL) and cosmesis compared with conventional BCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients who underwent BCS with or without LDMF between 2010 and 2020 at a single center. At least 1 year after surgery, we prospectively administered the BREAST-Q to assess QoL and obtained the patients' breast photographs. The cosmetic outcome was assessed using four panels composed of physicians and the BCCT.core software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were enrolled, of whom 62 and 58 underwent LDMF or BCS only, respectively. The LDMF group had significantly larger tumors, shorter nipple-to-tumor distances in preoperative examinations, and larger resected breast volumes than did the BCS-only group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The questionnaires revealed that QoL was poorer in the LDMF group, particularly in terms of the physical well-being score (40.9 vs. 20.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Notably, the level of patients' cosmetic satisfaction with their breasts was comparable, and the cosmetic evaluation was assessed by panels and the BCCT.core software showed no differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that cosmetic outcomes of performing LDMF are comparable to those of BCS alone while having the advantage of resecting larger volumes of breast tissue. Therefore, for those who strongly wish to preserve the cosmesis of their breasts, LDMF can be considered a favorable surgical option after the patient is oriented toward the potential for physical dysfunction after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/2b/jbc-26-344.PMC10475706.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e33","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Latissimus dorsi mini-flap (LDMF) reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a useful volume replacement technique when a large tumor is located in the upper or outer portion of the breast. However, few studies have reported the impact of LDMF on patients' quality of life (QoL) and cosmesis compared with conventional BCS.

Methods: We identified patients who underwent BCS with or without LDMF between 2010 and 2020 at a single center. At least 1 year after surgery, we prospectively administered the BREAST-Q to assess QoL and obtained the patients' breast photographs. The cosmetic outcome was assessed using four panels composed of physicians and the BCCT.core software.

Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled, of whom 62 and 58 underwent LDMF or BCS only, respectively. The LDMF group had significantly larger tumors, shorter nipple-to-tumor distances in preoperative examinations, and larger resected breast volumes than did the BCS-only group (p < 0.001). The questionnaires revealed that QoL was poorer in the LDMF group, particularly in terms of the physical well-being score (40.9 vs. 20.1, p < 0.001). Notably, the level of patients' cosmetic satisfaction with their breasts was comparable, and the cosmetic evaluation was assessed by panels and the BCCT.core software showed no differences between the groups.

Conclusion: Our results showed that cosmetic outcomes of performing LDMF are comparable to those of BCS alone while having the advantage of resecting larger volumes of breast tissue. Therefore, for those who strongly wish to preserve the cosmesis of their breasts, LDMF can be considered a favorable surgical option after the patient is oriented toward the potential for physical dysfunction after surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背阔肌微型皮瓣与不重建保乳手术的生存质量及美容效果比较。
目的:保乳手术(BCS)后背阔肌微型皮瓣(LDMF)重建是一种有用的体积替代技术,当一个大的肿瘤位于乳房的上部或外部部分。然而,与传统BCS相比,很少有研究报道LDMF对患者生活质量(QoL)和美容的影响。方法:我们在单一中心确定2010年至2020年间接受BCS伴或不伴LDMF的患者。术后至少1年,我们前瞻性地进行breast - q评估患者的生活质量,并获得患者的乳房照片。使用由医生和BCCT组成的四个小组评估美容结果。核心软件。结果:共有120例患者入组,其中62例和58例分别接受了LDMF或BCS。LDMF组的肿瘤更大,术前检查时乳头到肿瘤的距离更短,切除的乳房体积比仅bcs组大(p < 0.001)。问卷显示,LDMF组的生活质量较差,特别是在身体健康评分方面(40.9比20.1,p < 0.001)。值得注意的是,患者对其乳房的美容满意度水平具有可比性,并且美容评估由小组和BCCT进行评估。核心软件显示各组之间没有差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,LDMF的美容效果与单独的BCS相当,同时具有切除更大体积乳房组织的优势。因此,对于那些强烈希望保留乳房外观的患者,LDMF可以被认为是一个有利的手术选择,因为患者在手术后可能会出现身体功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Breast Cancer (abbreviated as ''J Breast Cancer'') is the official journal of the Korean Breast Cancer Society, which is issued quarterly in the last day of March, June, September, and December each year since 1998. All the contents of the Journal is available online at the official journal website (http://ejbc.kr) under open access policy. The journal aims to provide a forum for the academic communication between medical doctors, basic science researchers, and health care professionals to be interested in breast cancer. To get this aim, we publish original investigations, review articles, brief communications including case reports, editorial opinions on the topics of importance to breast cancer, and welcome new research findings and epidemiological studies, especially when they contain a regional data to grab the international reader''s interest. Although the journal is mainly dealing with the issues of breast cancer, rare cases among benign breast diseases or evidence-based scientifically written articles providing useful information for clinical practice can be published as well.
期刊最新文献
Variability in Breast Density Estimation and Its Impact on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment. p27 Cell Cycle Inhibitor and Survival in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer: Gene Ontology, Machine Learning, and Drug Screening Analysis. Targeted Inhibition of p21 Promotes the Growth of Breast Cancer Cells and Impairs the Tumor-Killing Effect of the Vaccinia Virus. Histopathological Downgrading of Borderline Phyllodes Tumor in a Young Patient Following Chemotherapy: A Case Report. Risk of Lymphedema After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1