Mobile Apps Aimed at Preventing and Handling Unintentional Injuries in Children Aged <7 Years: Systematic Review.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Interactive Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.2196/45258
Annett Schulze, Ann-Kathrin Lindemann, Fabian Brand, Johanna Geppert, Axel Menning, Paula Stehr, Doreen Reifegerste, Constanze Rossmann
{"title":"Mobile Apps Aimed at Preventing and Handling Unintentional Injuries in Children Aged <7 Years: Systematic Review.","authors":"Annett Schulze,&nbsp;Ann-Kathrin Lindemann,&nbsp;Fabian Brand,&nbsp;Johanna Geppert,&nbsp;Axel Menning,&nbsp;Paula Stehr,&nbsp;Doreen Reifegerste,&nbsp;Constanze Rossmann","doi":"10.2196/45258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite various global health crises, the prevention and handling of unintentional childhood injuries remains an important public health objective. Although several systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of different child injury prevention measures, these reviews did not address the evaluation of mobile communication intervention tools. Whether and how mobile apps were evaluated provides information on the extent to which communication theories, models, and evidence-based knowledge were considered. Previous studies have shown that the effectiveness of mobile apps increases when theories and evidence are considered during their development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to identify research on mobile apps dealing with the prevention and handling of unintentional injuries in children and examine the theoretical and methodological approaches thereof. In addition, this review analyzed the different needs of various target groups of the mobile apps described in the articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 8 electronic databases, ranging from interdisciplinary to medical and technical as well as social sciences databases, were searched for original research articles or brief reports in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings. Moreover, this review encompassed a systematic scan of articles published in the BMJ journal Injury Prevention. These steps were followed by a snowball search based on the literature references in the articles identified through the initial screening. The articles had to be written in English or German, published between 2008 and 2021, and evaluate mobile apps dealing with the prevention and handling of unintentional child injuries. The identified 5 studies were analyzed by 5 independent researchers using an inductive approach. Furthermore, the quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 articles were included and assessed with regard to overall quality of theoretical and methodological foundations, assessed variables, the focal app's architecture, and the needs of the study participants. The overall study quality was moderate, although part of this classification was due to a lack of details reported in the studies. Each study examined 1 mobile app aimed at parents and other caregivers. Each study assessed at least 1 usability- or user experience-related variable, whereas the needs of the included study participants were detailed in only 20% (1/5) of the cases. However, none of the studies referred to theories such as the Technology Acceptance Model during the development of the apps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The future development and evaluation of apps dealing with the prevention and handling of child injuries should combine insights into existing models on user experience and usability with established theories on mobile information behavior. This theory-based approach will increase the validity of such evaluation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"e45258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/45258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite various global health crises, the prevention and handling of unintentional childhood injuries remains an important public health objective. Although several systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of different child injury prevention measures, these reviews did not address the evaluation of mobile communication intervention tools. Whether and how mobile apps were evaluated provides information on the extent to which communication theories, models, and evidence-based knowledge were considered. Previous studies have shown that the effectiveness of mobile apps increases when theories and evidence are considered during their development.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify research on mobile apps dealing with the prevention and handling of unintentional injuries in children and examine the theoretical and methodological approaches thereof. In addition, this review analyzed the different needs of various target groups of the mobile apps described in the articles.

Methods: In total, 8 electronic databases, ranging from interdisciplinary to medical and technical as well as social sciences databases, were searched for original research articles or brief reports in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings. Moreover, this review encompassed a systematic scan of articles published in the BMJ journal Injury Prevention. These steps were followed by a snowball search based on the literature references in the articles identified through the initial screening. The articles had to be written in English or German, published between 2008 and 2021, and evaluate mobile apps dealing with the prevention and handling of unintentional child injuries. The identified 5 studies were analyzed by 5 independent researchers using an inductive approach. Furthermore, the quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: A total of 5 articles were included and assessed with regard to overall quality of theoretical and methodological foundations, assessed variables, the focal app's architecture, and the needs of the study participants. The overall study quality was moderate, although part of this classification was due to a lack of details reported in the studies. Each study examined 1 mobile app aimed at parents and other caregivers. Each study assessed at least 1 usability- or user experience-related variable, whereas the needs of the included study participants were detailed in only 20% (1/5) of the cases. However, none of the studies referred to theories such as the Technology Acceptance Model during the development of the apps.

Conclusions: The future development and evaluation of apps dealing with the prevention and handling of child injuries should combine insights into existing models on user experience and usability with established theories on mobile information behavior. This theory-based approach will increase the validity of such evaluation studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旨在预防和处理7岁以下儿童意外伤害的移动应用程序:系统综述。
背景:尽管存在各种全球健康危机,预防和处理儿童意外伤害仍然是一个重要的公共卫生目标。尽管几项系统性审查审查了不同儿童伤害预防措施的有效性,但这些审查并未涉及移动通信干预工具的评估。是否以及如何评估移动应用程序提供了有关通信理论、模型和循证知识被考虑的程度的信息。先前的研究表明,当在开发过程中考虑理论和证据时,移动应用程序的有效性会提高。目的:本系统综述旨在确定关于预防和处理儿童意外伤害的移动应用程序的研究,并检验其理论和方法论方法。此外,本文还分析了文章中描述的移动应用程序的不同目标群体的不同需求。方法:在8个电子数据库中,从跨学科数据库到医学、技术和社会科学数据库,检索同行评审期刊或会议记录中的原始研究文章或简要报告。此外,这篇综述包括对发表在《英国医学杂志》杂志《伤害预防》上的文章进行系统扫描。在这些步骤之后,根据通过初步筛选确定的文章中的参考文献进行滚雪球式搜索。这些文章必须用英语或德语撰写,发表于2008年至2021年间,并评估与预防和处理儿童意外伤害有关的移动应用程序。5名独立研究人员采用归纳法对确定的5项研究进行了分析。此外,使用混合方法评估工具对研究的质量进行了评估。结果:共纳入5篇文章,并对其理论和方法基础的总体质量、评估变量、焦点应用程序的架构和研究参与者的需求进行了评估。总体研究质量中等,尽管这种分类的部分原因是研究中缺乏详细报告。每项研究都检查了一款针对父母和其他照顾者的移动应用程序。每项研究都评估了至少一个与可用性或用户体验相关的变量,而纳入的研究参与者的需求仅在20%(1/5)的案例中详细说明。然而,在应用程序开发过程中,没有一项研究提到技术接受模型等理论。结论:未来开发和评估用于预防和处理儿童伤害的应用程序时,应将对现有用户体验和可用性模型的见解与移动信息行为的既定理论相结合。这种基于理论的方法将提高此类评估研究的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benefits of Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Management of Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: Targeted Literature Review. Homestay Hosting Dynamics and Refugee Well-Being: Scoping Review. Whole-Body Cryotherapy Reduces Systemic Inflammation in Healthy Adults: Pilot Cohort Study. Social Cohesion and COVID-19: Integrative Review. Patient Profile and Cost Savings of Long-Term Care in a Spanish Hospital: Retrospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1