Evaluation of the MYNX CONTROL™ Arterial Closure System for Achieving Primary Hemostasis after Arterial Femoral Access Following Peripheral Arterial Interventions, Compared to the FemoSealTM Closure System.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.3390/jcm12165255
Elias Noory, Tanja Böhme, Leonie Krause, Philipp Ruile, Jonas Salm, Ulrich Beschorner, Roaa Bollenbacher, Dirk Westermann, Thomas Zeller
{"title":"Evaluation of the MYNX CONTROL™ Arterial Closure System for Achieving Primary Hemostasis after Arterial Femoral Access Following Peripheral Arterial Interventions, Compared to the FemoSeal<sup>TM</sup> Closure System.","authors":"Elias Noory,&nbsp;Tanja Böhme,&nbsp;Leonie Krause,&nbsp;Philipp Ruile,&nbsp;Jonas Salm,&nbsp;Ulrich Beschorner,&nbsp;Roaa Bollenbacher,&nbsp;Dirk Westermann,&nbsp;Thomas Zeller","doi":"10.3390/jcm12165255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In addition to manual compression, various vascular closure devices (VCD) are available to seal the puncture site following arterial vascular procedures. <b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the extravascular MYNX CONTROL closure system for achieving primary hemostasis after femoral arterial access following peripheral arterial procedures, compared to the intravascular FemoSeal Aclosure system. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular intervention between April and November 2022 was performed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of significant puncture site complication defined as a complication resulting in medical treatment. Secondary endpoints included peri-interventional incidence of hematoma, peri-interventional changes in hemoglobin, incidence of emergency diagnostics and predictors for closure system failure. <b>Results:</b> Five hundred and forty-eight patients were included in this analysis. False aneurysm occurred in 18/273 cases (6.6%) following the use of the MYNX closure system, compared to 6/275 cases after using the FemoSeal closure system (2.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). The incidence of post-interventional hematoma was not significantly different (28 (10.3%) in the MYNX group versus 32 (11.6%) in the FemoSeal group, <i>p</i> = 0.358). Peri-interventional hemoglobin drop did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.449). Emergency diagnostics were not significantly performed more often in the MYNX group (14 (5.1%) versus 8 (2.9%), <i>p</i> = 0.134). A post-interventional duplex sonography showed stenosis at the puncture site in one patient after use of the MYNX system. For the entire cohort, oral anticoagulation was the only predictor for the failure of the closure device (<i>p</i> = 0.036). <b>Conclusions:</b> Device failure was more common after using the extravascular MYNX CONTROL system than after using the intravascular FemoSeal system. However, the need for surgical or interventional therapy due to device failure was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"12 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In addition to manual compression, various vascular closure devices (VCD) are available to seal the puncture site following arterial vascular procedures. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the extravascular MYNX CONTROL closure system for achieving primary hemostasis after femoral arterial access following peripheral arterial procedures, compared to the intravascular FemoSeal Aclosure system. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular intervention between April and November 2022 was performed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of significant puncture site complication defined as a complication resulting in medical treatment. Secondary endpoints included peri-interventional incidence of hematoma, peri-interventional changes in hemoglobin, incidence of emergency diagnostics and predictors for closure system failure. Results: Five hundred and forty-eight patients were included in this analysis. False aneurysm occurred in 18/273 cases (6.6%) following the use of the MYNX closure system, compared to 6/275 cases after using the FemoSeal closure system (2.2%, p = 0.006). The incidence of post-interventional hematoma was not significantly different (28 (10.3%) in the MYNX group versus 32 (11.6%) in the FemoSeal group, p = 0.358). Peri-interventional hemoglobin drop did not differ between groups (p = 0.449). Emergency diagnostics were not significantly performed more often in the MYNX group (14 (5.1%) versus 8 (2.9%), p = 0.134). A post-interventional duplex sonography showed stenosis at the puncture site in one patient after use of the MYNX system. For the entire cohort, oral anticoagulation was the only predictor for the failure of the closure device (p = 0.036). Conclusions: Device failure was more common after using the extravascular MYNX CONTROL system than after using the intravascular FemoSeal system. However, the need for surgical or interventional therapy due to device failure was low.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MYNX CONTROL™动脉封闭系统与FemoSealTM封闭系统相比,在外周动脉介入后动脉股动脉通路后实现初级止血的评估
背景:在动脉血管手术后,除了人工压迫外,还有多种血管闭合装置(VCD)可用于封闭穿刺部位。目的:评价外周动脉手术后,与血管内FemoSeal封闭系统相比,血管外MYNX CONTROL封闭系统在股动脉进入后实现原发性止血的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:对2022年4月至11月期间连续接受血管内介入治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。主要终点是明显穿刺部位并发症的发生率,定义为导致药物治疗的并发症。次要终点包括介入期血肿发生率、介入期血红蛋白变化、急诊诊断率和关闭系统失效的预测因子。结果:548例患者被纳入本分析。使用MYNX封闭系统后发生假动脉瘤18/273例(6.6%),而使用FemoSeal封闭系统后发生假动脉瘤6/275例(2.2%,p = 0.006)。介入后血肿发生率无显著差异(MYNX组28例(10.3%),FemoSeal组32例(11.6%),p = 0.358)。两组间介入期血红蛋白下降差异无统计学意义(p = 0.449)。在MYNX组中,紧急诊断并没有明显增加(14例(5.1%)对8例(2.9%),p = 0.134)。使用MYNX系统后,介入后超声检查显示有1例患者穿刺部位狭窄。对于整个队列,口服抗凝是关闭装置失败的唯一预测因素(p = 0.036)。结论:使用血管外MYNX CONTROL系统比使用血管内FemoSeal系统更容易发生器械故障。然而,由于设备故障,手术或介入治疗的需求很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Association Between MGMT Promoter Methylation and Clinical and Lifestyle Factors in Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Study in Korea. Genetic Syndromes and Multimorbidity in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Insights from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry. The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Tumor-Related Amputations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 132 Cases over Two Decades. Assessing Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1