How I want technology used in my care: Learning from documented choices of people living with dementia using a dyadic decision making tool.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2023-10-02 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2023.2252066
Natalie R Turner, Clara Berridge
{"title":"How I want technology used in my care: Learning from documented choices of people living with dementia using a dyadic decision making tool.","authors":"Natalie R Turner, Clara Berridge","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2023.2252066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While technologies for aging in place are promoted to support care partners and people living with dementia, perspectives of people living with dementia are underrepresented in both use decisions among families and discussions within academia and industry. This mixed-methods study examined the use preferences of twenty-nine people living with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) for four categories of technologies: location tracking, in-home sensors, web-cameras, and virtual companion robots. Participants completed a novel dyadic intervention, Let's Talk Tech, where they documented their preferences of the four technology categories for care planning purposes. Post-test interviews were thematically analyzed and provide insight into selection processes. Technology preferences varied considerably by and within participant living with mild AD. Excepting location tracking, non-technology and low-technology options were more desirable than the featured technologies. Control over technology use was of great importance to people living with AD. Considerations given to technology preference selection imperfectly fit within the new Health Technology Acceptance Model (H-TAM) developed for older adults. These findings underscore the importance of including people living with dementia in decision making about technologies to support care at home and the need for further personalization and tailorable technological devices to accommodate and align with their preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":" ","pages":"387-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10792656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2023.2252066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While technologies for aging in place are promoted to support care partners and people living with dementia, perspectives of people living with dementia are underrepresented in both use decisions among families and discussions within academia and industry. This mixed-methods study examined the use preferences of twenty-nine people living with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) for four categories of technologies: location tracking, in-home sensors, web-cameras, and virtual companion robots. Participants completed a novel dyadic intervention, Let's Talk Tech, where they documented their preferences of the four technology categories for care planning purposes. Post-test interviews were thematically analyzed and provide insight into selection processes. Technology preferences varied considerably by and within participant living with mild AD. Excepting location tracking, non-technology and low-technology options were more desirable than the featured technologies. Control over technology use was of great importance to people living with AD. Considerations given to technology preference selection imperfectly fit within the new Health Technology Acceptance Model (H-TAM) developed for older adults. These findings underscore the importance of including people living with dementia in decision making about technologies to support care at home and the need for further personalization and tailorable technological devices to accommodate and align with their preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我希望技术在我的护理中如何使用:使用二元决策工具,从痴呆症患者的记录选择中学习。
虽然现有的老龄化技术被推广以支持护理伙伴和痴呆症患者,但在家庭的使用决策以及学术界和行业内的讨论中,痴呆症患者的观点都不足。这项混合方法研究调查了29名轻度阿尔茨海默病患者对四类技术的使用偏好:位置跟踪、家庭传感器、网络摄像头和虚拟伴侣机器人。参与者完成了一项新颖的二元干预,Let's Talk Tech,记录了他们对四种技术类别的偏好,用于护理规划。对测试后的面试进行主题分析,深入了解选拔过程。轻度AD患者的技术偏好各不相同。除了位置跟踪之外,非技术和低技术的选择比特色技术更可取。控制技术使用对AD患者非常重要。对技术偏好选择的考虑不完全符合为老年人开发的新健康技术接受模型(H-TAM)。这些发现强调了将痴呆症患者纳入支持家庭护理技术决策的重要性,以及进一步个性化和可定制技术设备的必要性,以适应和符合他们的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the infodemic scale. Personalized medicine meets artificial intelligence: beyond “hype”, towards the metaverse Technological acceptance and features needed in mobile health apps development for people living with dementia and their caregivers in Indonesia Alzheimer’s in the modern age: Ethical challenges in the use of digital monitoring to identify cognitive changes Self-care intervention using mobile apps for sexual and reproductive health in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1