Influence of response-time limits on automated hearing threshold determination.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2023.2250554
Marion U Bug, Melina Strüp, Sven Vollbort, Thomas Fedtke
{"title":"Influence of response-time limits on automated hearing threshold determination.","authors":"Marion U Bug, Melina Strüp, Sven Vollbort, Thomas Fedtke","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2250554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In automated hearing threshold determination procedures, prespecified response- time limits can be applied to evaluate whether a stimulus was truly heard by checking whether the test subject reacts to the onset and the offset of the stimuli within given time intervals. The influence of different response-time limits on the threshold of normal-hearing test subjects was investigated.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-stage hearing threshold level measurements applying the ISO 8253-1 (2010) bracketing procedure were performed. Pre-tests at 125 Hz and 1000 Hz were carried out with maximum accepted response times of 600 ms, 1000 ms, and 1200 ms. Subsequently, thresholds were measured at the seven octaves between 125 Hz and 8000 Hz with maximum accepted response times of 600 ms and 1000 ms.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>15 test subjects in pre-tests, 25 test subjects in the main study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Threshold levels determined with a maximum accepted response time of 1000 ms are 2.6 dB lower than those obtained with a maximum accepted response time of 600 ms (95% CI -1.6 dB to 6.9 dB). The threshold shift was similar at all frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this study, response-time limits after both stimulus onset and offset of at least 1000 ms are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"648-653"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2250554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In automated hearing threshold determination procedures, prespecified response- time limits can be applied to evaluate whether a stimulus was truly heard by checking whether the test subject reacts to the onset and the offset of the stimuli within given time intervals. The influence of different response-time limits on the threshold of normal-hearing test subjects was investigated.

Design: Two-stage hearing threshold level measurements applying the ISO 8253-1 (2010) bracketing procedure were performed. Pre-tests at 125 Hz and 1000 Hz were carried out with maximum accepted response times of 600 ms, 1000 ms, and 1200 ms. Subsequently, thresholds were measured at the seven octaves between 125 Hz and 8000 Hz with maximum accepted response times of 600 ms and 1000 ms.

Study sample: 15 test subjects in pre-tests, 25 test subjects in the main study.

Results: Threshold levels determined with a maximum accepted response time of 1000 ms are 2.6 dB lower than those obtained with a maximum accepted response time of 600 ms (95% CI -1.6 dB to 6.9 dB). The threshold shift was similar at all frequencies.

Conclusions: Based on this study, response-time limits after both stimulus onset and offset of at least 1000 ms are recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
响应时间限制对自动听力阈值测定的影响。
目的:在自动听力阈值测定程序中,可以使用预先规定的反应时限,通过检查测试对象是否在给定的时间间隔内对刺激的起始和偏移做出反应,来评估是否真正听到了刺激。我们研究了不同反应时限对正常听力测试者阈值的影响:设计:采用 ISO 8253-1(2010 年)括号程序进行两阶段听力阈值水平测量。在 125 Hz 和 1000 Hz 下进行了预测试,最大可接受反应时间分别为 600 毫秒、1000 毫秒和 1200 毫秒。随后,在 125 Hz 和 8000 Hz 之间的七个倍频程测量阈值,最大反应时间分别为 600 ms 和 1000 ms:最大反应时间为 1000 毫秒时的阈值水平比最大反应时间为 600 毫秒时的阈值水平低 2.6 分贝(95% CI -1.6 分贝至 6.9 分贝)。所有频率的阈值偏移情况相似:根据这项研究,建议刺激开始和偏移后的反应时间限制至少为 1000 毫秒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1