Efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy in octogenarian patients: a retrospective study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Minerva gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03220-X
Alessandro Pezzoli, Matteo Guarino, Nadia Fusetti, Elena Pizzo, Marzia Simoni, Loredana Simone, Viviana Cifalà, Riccardo Solimando, Benedetta Perna, Gianni Testino, Giacomo Caio, Lisa Lungaro, Fabio Caputo, Giorgio Zoli, Alberto Merighi, Roberto DE Giorgio
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy in octogenarian patients: a retrospective study.","authors":"Alessandro Pezzoli,&nbsp;Matteo Guarino,&nbsp;Nadia Fusetti,&nbsp;Elena Pizzo,&nbsp;Marzia Simoni,&nbsp;Loredana Simone,&nbsp;Viviana Cifalà,&nbsp;Riccardo Solimando,&nbsp;Benedetta Perna,&nbsp;Gianni Testino,&nbsp;Giacomo Caio,&nbsp;Lisa Lungaro,&nbsp;Fabio Caputo,&nbsp;Giorgio Zoli,&nbsp;Alberto Merighi,&nbsp;Roberto DE Giorgio","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03220-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Life expectancy and the number of ultra-octogenarians increased significantly, thus making crucial the appropriateness of several endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to provide a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients aged over 80 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre study, 900 patients underwent capsule endoscopy between 2002 and 2015 for different indications; of these 106 patients aged ≥80 years (group A) and 99 patients aged 40-60 years (control group B) were retrospectively selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Occult gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 62.1% of all indications for capsule endoscopy in group B, compared to 95.2% in group A (P<0.001). Although not statistically significant, the diagnostic yield was higher in group A (71%) vs. group B (62%). The percentages of reaching the cecum and the median gastric transit time were uniform within the two groups. In contrast, small bowel transit time was longer in group A vs. B. Small bowel preparation was similar in the two groups. The exam was generally well tolerated in both groups, with capsule aspiration being one of the main adverse events, which occurred in two elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data expand previous findings confirming that capsule endoscopy can be performed safely even in very old patients and show that the diagnostic yield is similar to that of younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18653,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":"69 3","pages":"388-395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03220-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Life expectancy and the number of ultra-octogenarians increased significantly, thus making crucial the appropriateness of several endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to provide a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients aged over 80 years.

Methods: In this single-centre study, 900 patients underwent capsule endoscopy between 2002 and 2015 for different indications; of these 106 patients aged ≥80 years (group A) and 99 patients aged 40-60 years (control group B) were retrospectively selected.

Results: Occult gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 62.1% of all indications for capsule endoscopy in group B, compared to 95.2% in group A (P<0.001). Although not statistically significant, the diagnostic yield was higher in group A (71%) vs. group B (62%). The percentages of reaching the cecum and the median gastric transit time were uniform within the two groups. In contrast, small bowel transit time was longer in group A vs. B. Small bowel preparation was similar in the two groups. The exam was generally well tolerated in both groups, with capsule aspiration being one of the main adverse events, which occurred in two elderly patients.

Conclusions: Our data expand previous findings confirming that capsule endoscopy can be performed safely even in very old patients and show that the diagnostic yield is similar to that of younger patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶囊内窥镜治疗老年患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
背景:预期寿命和超80岁老人的数量显著增加,因此对老年患者进行内镜手术的适当性至关重要。本研究的目的是回顾性分析80岁以上患者胶囊内窥镜检查(CE)的有效性和安全性。方法:在这项单中心研究中,900例患者在2002年至2015年间因不同适应症接受了胶囊内窥镜检查;回顾性选择年龄≥80岁的106例患者(A组)和40 ~ 60岁的99例患者(对照组B组)。结果:B组隐蔽性胃肠道出血占胶囊内镜所有适应症的62.1%,而A组为95.2% (p)结论:我们的数据扩展了先前的发现,证实胶囊内镜即使在非常老的患者中也可以安全进行,并且显示诊断率与年轻患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva gastroenterology
Minerva gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between intestinal microflora and obesity. The impact of comprehensive nursing intervention on the psychological status and quality of life of patients with severe acute myeloid leukemia. Health-related quality of life in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: a cross-sectional study from a single centre in Denmark. Analysis of prognostic factors and model establishment of long-term postoperative effect in children with hepatoblastoma. Serrated polyps <10 mm cannot reliably be characterized by i-Scan without magnification at routine colonoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1