Advancing cross-sectoral data linkage to understand and address the health impacts of social exclusion: Challenges and potential solutions.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2116
Lindsay A Pearce, Rohan Borschmann, Jesse T Young, Stuart A Kinner
{"title":"Advancing cross-sectoral data linkage to understand and address the health impacts of social exclusion: Challenges and potential solutions.","authors":"Lindsay A Pearce,&nbsp;Rohan Borschmann,&nbsp;Jesse T Young,&nbsp;Stuart A Kinner","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of administrative health data for research, monitoring, and quality improvement has proliferated in recent decades, leading to improvements in health across many disease areas and across the life course. However, not all populations are equally visible in administrative health data, and those that are less visible may be excluded from the benefits of associated research. Socially excluded populations - including the homeless, people with substance dependence, people involved in sex work, migrants or asylum seekers, and people with a history of incarceration - are typically characterised by health inequity. Yet people who experience social exclusion are often invisible within routinely collected administrative health data because information on their markers of social exclusion are not routinely recorded by healthcare providers. These circumstances make it difficult to understand the often complex health needs of socially excluded populations, evaluate and improve the quality of health services that they interact with, provide more accessible and appropriate health services, and develop effective and integrated responses to reduce health inequity. In this commentary we discuss how linking data from multiple sectors with administrative health data, often called <i>cross-sectoral data linkage</i>, is a key method for systematically identifying socially excluded populations in administrative health data and addressing other issues related to data quality and representativeness. We discuss how cross-sectoral data linkage can improve the representation of socially excluded populations in research, monitoring, and quality improvement initiatives, which can in turn inform coordinated responses across multiple sectors of service delivery. Finally, we articulate key challenges and potential solutions for advancing the use of cross-sectoral data linkage to improve the health of socially excluded populations, using international examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"2116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/35/ijpds-08-2116.PMC10476462.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of administrative health data for research, monitoring, and quality improvement has proliferated in recent decades, leading to improvements in health across many disease areas and across the life course. However, not all populations are equally visible in administrative health data, and those that are less visible may be excluded from the benefits of associated research. Socially excluded populations - including the homeless, people with substance dependence, people involved in sex work, migrants or asylum seekers, and people with a history of incarceration - are typically characterised by health inequity. Yet people who experience social exclusion are often invisible within routinely collected administrative health data because information on their markers of social exclusion are not routinely recorded by healthcare providers. These circumstances make it difficult to understand the often complex health needs of socially excluded populations, evaluate and improve the quality of health services that they interact with, provide more accessible and appropriate health services, and develop effective and integrated responses to reduce health inequity. In this commentary we discuss how linking data from multiple sectors with administrative health data, often called cross-sectoral data linkage, is a key method for systematically identifying socially excluded populations in administrative health data and addressing other issues related to data quality and representativeness. We discuss how cross-sectoral data linkage can improve the representation of socially excluded populations in research, monitoring, and quality improvement initiatives, which can in turn inform coordinated responses across multiple sectors of service delivery. Finally, we articulate key challenges and potential solutions for advancing the use of cross-sectoral data linkage to improve the health of socially excluded populations, using international examples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进跨部门数据联系,以了解和处理社会排斥对健康的影响:挑战和可能的解决办法。
近几十年来,在研究、监测和质量改进方面使用行政卫生数据的情况激增,导致许多疾病领域和整个生命过程的健康状况得到改善。然而,并非所有人口在行政卫生数据中都同样可见,那些不太明显的人可能被排除在相关研究的好处之外。被社会排斥的人群——包括无家可归者、药物依赖者、从事性工作的人、移民或寻求庇护者以及有监禁史的人——的典型特征是健康不平等。然而,在常规收集的行政卫生数据中,往往看不到遭受社会排斥的人,因为医疗保健提供者没有常规记录有关其社会排斥标志的信息。这些情况使人们难以了解被社会排斥的人口往往复杂的保健需要,难以评价和改进与他们相互作用的保健服务的质量,难以提供更容易获得和适当的保健服务,难以制定有效和综合的对策,以减少保健不平等现象。在本评论中,我们将讨论如何将来自多个部门的数据与行政卫生数据联系起来(通常称为跨部门数据联系),这是系统地确定行政卫生数据中被社会排斥的人群并解决与数据质量和代表性有关的其他问题的关键方法。我们讨论了跨部门数据链接如何在研究、监测和质量改进举措中改善社会排斥人群的代表性,这反过来可以为跨多个服务提供部门的协调响应提供信息。最后,我们利用国际实例阐明了促进利用跨部门数据联系改善社会排斥人口健康的主要挑战和可能的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Defining a low-risk birth cohort: a cohort study comparing two perinatal data sets in Ontario, Canada. Data resource profile: nutrition data in the VA million veteran program. Deprivation effects on length of stay and death of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Greater Manchester. Variation in colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in Scotland: real world evidence from national linked administrative health data. Examining the quality and population representativeness of linked survey and administrative data: guidance and illustration using linked 1958 National Child Development Study and Hospital Episode Statistics data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1