Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1111/jrh.12793
NithyaPriya Ramalingam PhD, Jennifer Coury MA, Chrystal Barnes BS, Erin S. Kenzie PhD, Amanda F. Petrik PhD, Rajasekhara R. Mummadi MD, Gloria Coronado PhD, Melinda M. Davis PhD
{"title":"Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity","authors":"NithyaPriya Ramalingam PhD,&nbsp;Jennifer Coury MA,&nbsp;Chrystal Barnes BS,&nbsp;Erin S. Kenzie PhD,&nbsp;Amanda F. Petrik PhD,&nbsp;Rajasekhara R. Mummadi MD,&nbsp;Gloria Coronado PhD,&nbsp;Melinda M. Davis PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Colonoscopy can prevent morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) and is the most commonly used screening method in the United States. Barriers to colonoscopy at multiple levels can contribute to disparities. Yet, in rural settings, little is known about who delivers colonoscopy and facilitators and barriers to colonoscopy access through screening completion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a qualitative study with providers in rural Oregon who worked in endoscopy centers or primary care clinics. Semistructured interviews, conducted in July and August, 2021, focused on clinician experiences providing colonoscopy to rural Medicaid patients, including workflows, barriers, and access. We used thematic analysis, through immersion crystallization, to analyze interview transcripts and develop emergent themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed 19 providers. We found two categories of colonoscopy providers: primary care providers (PCPs) doing colonoscopy on their own patients (<i>n</i> = 9; 47%) and general surgeons providing colonoscopy to patients referred to their services (<i>n</i> = 10; 53%). Providers described barriers to colonoscopy at the provider, community, and patient levels and suggested patient supports could help overcome them. Providers found current colonoscopy capacity sufficient, but noted PCPs trained to perform colonoscopy would be key to continued accessibility. Finally, providers shared concerns about the shrinking number of PCP endoscopists, especially with anticipated increased screening demand related to the CRC screening guideline shift.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These themes reflect opportunities to address multilevel barriers to improve access, colonoscopy capacity, and patient education approaches. Our results highlight that PCPs are an essential part of the workforce that provides colonoscopy in rural areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"40 2","pages":"272-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Colonoscopy can prevent morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) and is the most commonly used screening method in the United States. Barriers to colonoscopy at multiple levels can contribute to disparities. Yet, in rural settings, little is known about who delivers colonoscopy and facilitators and barriers to colonoscopy access through screening completion.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study with providers in rural Oregon who worked in endoscopy centers or primary care clinics. Semistructured interviews, conducted in July and August, 2021, focused on clinician experiences providing colonoscopy to rural Medicaid patients, including workflows, barriers, and access. We used thematic analysis, through immersion crystallization, to analyze interview transcripts and develop emergent themes.

Findings

We interviewed 19 providers. We found two categories of colonoscopy providers: primary care providers (PCPs) doing colonoscopy on their own patients (n = 9; 47%) and general surgeons providing colonoscopy to patients referred to their services (n = 10; 53%). Providers described barriers to colonoscopy at the provider, community, and patient levels and suggested patient supports could help overcome them. Providers found current colonoscopy capacity sufficient, but noted PCPs trained to perform colonoscopy would be key to continued accessibility. Finally, providers shared concerns about the shrinking number of PCP endoscopists, especially with anticipated increased screening demand related to the CRC screening guideline shift.

Conclusions

These themes reflect opportunities to address multilevel barriers to improve access, colonoscopy capacity, and patient education approaches. Our results highlight that PCPs are an essential part of the workforce that provides colonoscopy in rural areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在农村环境中提供结肠镜检查:对提供者背景、障碍、促进者和能力的定性评估。
目的:结肠镜检查可以预防癌症(CRC)的发病率和死亡率,是美国最常用的筛查方法。结肠镜检查在多个层面上的障碍可能会导致差异。然而,在农村环境中,人们对谁提供结肠镜检查以及通过筛查完成结肠镜检查的促进者和障碍知之甚少。方法:我们对俄勒冈州农村在内窥镜检查中心或初级保健诊所工作的提供者进行了一项定性研究。2021年7月和8月进行的半结构化访谈,重点关注临床医生为农村医疗补助患者提供结肠镜检查的经验,包括工作流程、障碍和获取途径。我们使用主题分析,通过沉浸式结晶,来分析访谈记录,并发展涌现的主题。调查结果:我们采访了19家供应商。我们发现了两类结肠镜检查提供者:为自己的患者进行结肠镜检查的初级保健提供者(PCP)(n=9;47%)和为其服务的患者提供结肠镜检查(n=10;53%)的普通外科医生。提供者描述了提供者、社区和患者层面的结肠镜检查障碍,并建议患者支持可以帮助克服这些障碍。提供者发现目前的结肠镜检查能力已经足够,但指出接受过结肠镜检查培训的PCP将是继续获得结肠镜检查的关键。最后,医疗服务提供者对PCP内窥镜医生数量的减少表示担忧,特别是由于CRC筛查指南的转变,预计筛查需求会增加。结论:这些主题反映了解决多层次障碍的机会,以提高获取、结肠镜检查能力和患者教育方法。我们的研究结果强调,PCP是在农村地区提供结肠镜检查的劳动力的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
The lived experiences and unmet needs of prostate and colorectal male cancer survivors in rural Virginia: A qualitative study. Is Walk Score a useful tool for measuring walkability in rural communities? Clinical outcomes and profitability following rural hospital mergers and acquisitions. Community responses and adaptations following the closure of a rural pharmacy and primary care facility. Weight status underestimation and weight management goals among adults in the rural South of the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1