The effectiveness of peroneal nerve stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled single-blind study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2023.10998
Özgür Yeşilöz, Meliha Kasapoğlu Aksoy
{"title":"The effectiveness of peroneal nerve stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled single-blind study.","authors":"Özgür Yeşilöz,&nbsp;Meliha Kasapoğlu Aksoy","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2023.10998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with peroneal nerve stimulation (PNS) on muscle strength around the knee, proprioception, pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial included 63 patients with clinical and radiological diagnoses of knee OA between December 2019 and March 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (NMES+PNS, n=31) and Group 2 (NMES, n=32). The patients were followed up at two and six weeks. Main outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Nottingham Health Profile, and 100-m walking test, quadriceps muscle strength, hamstring muscle strength (HMS), and joint position sense were evaluated using a computer-controlled isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec, 90°/sec, and 120°/sec angular velocities. The proprioception was evaluated at 30° and 60° flexion angles using the same device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two patients from Group 1 and two patients from Group 2 were excluded from the study after they failed to show up for the six-week control. As a result, the study was completed with 59 patients (30 females, 29 males; 55.9±6.1 years; range, 40 to 65 years). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the 100-m walking test parameter at the six-week control in favor of Group 1 (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in favor of Group 1 in the parameters of proprioception (30° and 60°) and HMS (60° and 90°) in both the two-week evaluation and six-week controls (p<0.05). The HMS 120° parameter showed a significant difference in favor of Group 1 at the six-week control (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with knee OA, we believe that PNS combined with NMES may be more effective than NMES treatment alone in terms of proprioception, HMS, and functional status.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"69 3","pages":"317-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/6e/TurkJPhysMedRehab-69-317.PMC10478537.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2023.10998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with peroneal nerve stimulation (PNS) on muscle strength around the knee, proprioception, pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Patients and methods: The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial included 63 patients with clinical and radiological diagnoses of knee OA between December 2019 and March 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (NMES+PNS, n=31) and Group 2 (NMES, n=32). The patients were followed up at two and six weeks. Main outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Nottingham Health Profile, and 100-m walking test, quadriceps muscle strength, hamstring muscle strength (HMS), and joint position sense were evaluated using a computer-controlled isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec, 90°/sec, and 120°/sec angular velocities. The proprioception was evaluated at 30° and 60° flexion angles using the same device.

Results: Two patients from Group 1 and two patients from Group 2 were excluded from the study after they failed to show up for the six-week control. As a result, the study was completed with 59 patients (30 females, 29 males; 55.9±6.1 years; range, 40 to 65 years). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the 100-m walking test parameter at the six-week control in favor of Group 1 (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in favor of Group 1 in the parameters of proprioception (30° and 60°) and HMS (60° and 90°) in both the two-week evaluation and six-week controls (p<0.05). The HMS 120° parameter showed a significant difference in favor of Group 1 at the six-week control (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with knee OA, we believe that PNS combined with NMES may be more effective than NMES treatment alone in terms of proprioception, HMS, and functional status.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腓神经刺激联合神经肌肉电刺激治疗膝骨性关节炎的有效性:一项随机对照单盲研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)联合腓神经刺激(PNS)对膝关节周围肌肉力量、本体感觉、疼痛、功能状态和生活质量的影响。患者和方法:这项前瞻性、随机、单盲、对照试验纳入了2019年12月至2020年3月期间63例临床和影像学诊断为膝关节OA的患者。将患者分为两组:1组(NMES+PNS, n=31)和2组(NMES, n=32)。在两周和六周时对患者进行随访。主要结果测量是视觉模拟量表、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数、诺丁汉健康概况、100米步行测试、股四头肌力量、腘绳肌力量(HMS)和关节位置感,使用计算机控制的等速测力仪在60°/秒、90°/秒和120°/秒角速度下进行评估。使用相同的装置在30°和60°屈曲角度下评估本体感觉。结果:1组2例患者和2组2例患者在6周的对照组未出现后被排除在研究之外。结果,研究完成了59例患者(女性30例,男性29例;55.9±6.1年;范围:40至65岁)。两组在6周对照时的100米步行测试参数有显著差异,1组更有利(p结论:在膝关节OA患者中,我们认为PNS联合NMES在本体感觉、HMS和功能状态方面可能比单独NMES治疗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
期刊最新文献
Robot-assisted gait training in stroke. Short-term effectiveness of epidermis dermis fascia kinesiotaping technique in myofascial pain syndrome on upper trapezius: A multi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical study. Comparison of the effect of separate and simultaneous application of Tecar therapy and low-level laser therapy on the neurological symptoms of type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy of lower limbs. Effect of low-frequency repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation in hemichorea-hemiballismus with ipsilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage: A case report. Effectiveness of static, dynamic and combined dry needling techniques in the management of myofascial pain syndrome: A three-group study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1