Regulatory Measures to Improve the Safety of CAR-T-Cell Treatment.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000526786
Philipp Berg, Sonja Schönefeld, Gabriele Ruppert-Seipp, Markus B Funk
{"title":"Regulatory Measures to Improve the Safety of CAR-T-Cell Treatment.","authors":"Philipp Berg,&nbsp;Sonja Schönefeld,&nbsp;Gabriele Ruppert-Seipp,&nbsp;Markus B Funk","doi":"10.1159/000526786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regulatory activities aim to facilitate the safe use of novel therapeutics such as genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Toxicities associated with CAR-T-cell therapies have led to modified safety management guidance in clinical trials and the implementation of post-marketing requirements. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of individual risk-minimizing measures to evaluate the appropriateness of regulatory activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We re-examined clinical trial data prior to and after the introduction of revised treatment guidelines; we analysed spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports submitted to the EudraVigilance database in 2019/2020 regarding their completeness; and we performed a survey of treatment centres in Germany that have been qualified for the use of commercial CAR-T cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower combined incidences of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) as well as neurotoxicity occurred following CAR-T-cell treatment after a revision of management guidelines, suggesting earlier intervention compared to before (12.6% vs. 20.5%). Numerous post-marketing ADR reports lacked information important for case assessment. Full details on treatment indication, CRS onset, outcome, and grading were available for just 38.3% of CRS cases. Survey responses support the majority of regulatory requirements for centre qualification. Time investment was highest for training of healthcare professionals, which required an average of 6.5 staff members (range 2-20) and lasted more than 2 days per person in half of the facilities. The need to harmonize the regulatory requirements for the different CAR-T-cell therapeutics was emphasized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Defined regulatory measures can support the safe and effective use of new therapies and are indicated for structured recording of post-marketing data, and the evaluation of such measures appears to be necessary for the continuous improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23252,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/95/tmh-0050-0218.PMC10331154.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Regulatory activities aim to facilitate the safe use of novel therapeutics such as genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Toxicities associated with CAR-T-cell therapies have led to modified safety management guidance in clinical trials and the implementation of post-marketing requirements. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of individual risk-minimizing measures to evaluate the appropriateness of regulatory activities.

Methods: We re-examined clinical trial data prior to and after the introduction of revised treatment guidelines; we analysed spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports submitted to the EudraVigilance database in 2019/2020 regarding their completeness; and we performed a survey of treatment centres in Germany that have been qualified for the use of commercial CAR-T cells.

Results: Lower combined incidences of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) as well as neurotoxicity occurred following CAR-T-cell treatment after a revision of management guidelines, suggesting earlier intervention compared to before (12.6% vs. 20.5%). Numerous post-marketing ADR reports lacked information important for case assessment. Full details on treatment indication, CRS onset, outcome, and grading were available for just 38.3% of CRS cases. Survey responses support the majority of regulatory requirements for centre qualification. Time investment was highest for training of healthcare professionals, which required an average of 6.5 staff members (range 2-20) and lasted more than 2 days per person in half of the facilities. The need to harmonize the regulatory requirements for the different CAR-T-cell therapeutics was emphasized.

Conclusion: Defined regulatory measures can support the safe and effective use of new therapies and are indicated for structured recording of post-marketing data, and the evaluation of such measures appears to be necessary for the continuous improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高car - t细胞治疗安全性的监管措施
导言:调控活动旨在促进新疗法的安全使用,如基因工程嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞。与car - t细胞疗法相关的毒性已导致临床试验中安全管理指南的修改和上市后要求的实施。本研究的目的是估计个体风险最小化措施的效果,以评估监管活动的适当性。方法:我们在引入修订后的治疗指南之前和之后重新审查临床试验数据;我们分析了2019/2020年提交给EudraVigilance数据库的自发性药物不良反应(ADR)报告的完整性;我们对德国有资格使用商业CAR-T细胞的治疗中心进行了调查。结果:car - t细胞治疗后,在修订管理指南后,严重细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和神经毒性的综合发生率较低,表明与之前相比,更早的干预(12.6%对20.5%)。许多上市后不良反应报告缺乏对病例评估重要的信息。只有38.3%的CRS病例可获得有关治疗指征、CRS发病、结局和分级的详细信息。调查结果支持大多数对中心资格的监管要求。培训保健专业人员的时间投入最高,平均需要6.5名工作人员(范围2-20人),在一半的设施中,每人持续时间超过2天。强调了协调不同car - t细胞疗法的监管要求的必要性。结论:明确的监管措施可以支持新疗法的安全有效使用,并适用于上市后数据的结构化记录,对这些措施的评估似乎是持续改进的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to all areas of transfusion medicine. These include the quality and security of blood products, therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives, transfusion-related questions in transplantation, stem cell manipulation, therapeutic and diagnostic problems of homeostasis, immuno-hematological investigations, and legal aspects of the production of blood products as well as hemotherapy. Both comprehensive reviews and primary publications that detail the newest work in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy promote the international exchange of knowledge within these disciplines. Consistent with this goal, continuing clinical education is also specifically addressed.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Water Bath versus Refrigerator Thaw on Cryoprecipitate Fibrinogen and Factor VIII Content Using a Pre-Pooled Plasma Experimental Approach A Novel c.459_460insC Variation in the XK Gene Associated with McLeod Syndrome In vitro Generated Megakaryocytes for the Detection of Human Platelet Antigen-Specific Alloantibodies Effectors of the Future: Universal Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulation of Blood Group Expression: Another Layer of Complexity to Consider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1