Family violence homicide rates: a state-wide comparison of three data sources in Victoria, Australia.

Reena Sarkar, Joanna F Dipnall, Richard Bassed, Joan Ozanne-Smith Ao
{"title":"Family violence homicide rates: a state-wide comparison of three data sources in Victoria, Australia.","authors":"Reena Sarkar,&nbsp;Joanna F Dipnall,&nbsp;Richard Bassed,&nbsp;Joan Ozanne-Smith Ao","doi":"10.1177/18333583211060464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family violence homicide (FVH) is a major public health and social problem in Australia. FVH trend rates are key outcomes that determine the effectiveness of current management practices and policy directions. Data source-related methodological problems affect FVH research and policy and the reliable measurement of homicide trends.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine data reliability and temporal trends of Victorian FVH rates and sex and relationship patterns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>FVH rates per 100,000 persons in Victoria were compared between the National Coronial Information System (NCIS), Coroners Court of Victoria (CCoV) Homicide Register, and the National Homicide Monitoring Program (NHMP). Trends for 2001-2017 were analysed using Joinpoint regression. Crude rates were determined by sex and relationship categories using annual frequencies and Australian Bureau of Statistics population estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NCIS closed FVH cases totalled 360, and an apparent downward trend in the FVH rate was identified. However, CCoV and NHMP rates trended upwards. While NCIS and CCoV were case-based, NHMP was incident-based, contributing to rate variations. The NCIS-derived trend was particularly impacted by unavailable case data, potential coding errors and entry backlog. Neither CCoV nor NHMP provided victim-age in their public domain data to enable age-adjusted rate comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current datasets have limitations for FVH trend determination; most notably lag times for NCIS data.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study identified an indicative upward trend in FVH rates in Victoria, suggesting insufficiency of current management and policy settings for its prevention and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":"52 3","pages":"135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583211060464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Family violence homicide (FVH) is a major public health and social problem in Australia. FVH trend rates are key outcomes that determine the effectiveness of current management practices and policy directions. Data source-related methodological problems affect FVH research and policy and the reliable measurement of homicide trends.

Objective: This study aimed to determine data reliability and temporal trends of Victorian FVH rates and sex and relationship patterns.

Method: FVH rates per 100,000 persons in Victoria were compared between the National Coronial Information System (NCIS), Coroners Court of Victoria (CCoV) Homicide Register, and the National Homicide Monitoring Program (NHMP). Trends for 2001-2017 were analysed using Joinpoint regression. Crude rates were determined by sex and relationship categories using annual frequencies and Australian Bureau of Statistics population estimates.

Results: NCIS closed FVH cases totalled 360, and an apparent downward trend in the FVH rate was identified. However, CCoV and NHMP rates trended upwards. While NCIS and CCoV were case-based, NHMP was incident-based, contributing to rate variations. The NCIS-derived trend was particularly impacted by unavailable case data, potential coding errors and entry backlog. Neither CCoV nor NHMP provided victim-age in their public domain data to enable age-adjusted rate comparison.

Conclusion: Current datasets have limitations for FVH trend determination; most notably lag times for NCIS data.

Implications: This study identified an indicative upward trend in FVH rates in Victoria, suggesting insufficiency of current management and policy settings for its prevention and control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭暴力杀人率:澳大利亚维多利亚州全州范围内三个数据来源的比较。
背景:家庭暴力杀人(FVH)是澳大利亚一个主要的公共卫生和社会问题。FVH趋势率是决定当前管理做法和政策方向有效性的关键结果。与数据来源有关的方法问题影响到家庭暴力的研究和政策以及对杀人趋势的可靠衡量。目的:本研究旨在确定维多利亚时期FVH率和性别及关系模式的数据可靠性和时间趋势。方法:比较维多利亚州国家死因信息系统(NCIS)、维多利亚州死因法院(CCoV)杀人登记和国家杀人监测计划(NHMP)中每10万人中FVH的发生率。使用Joinpoint回归分析2001-2017年的趋势。根据年度频率和澳大利亚统计局的人口估计,按性别和关系类别确定粗略比率。结果:NCIS共查获FVH病例360例,FVH发生率呈明显下降趋势。然而,冠状病毒和NHMP发病率呈上升趋势。NCIS和冠状病毒是基于病例的,而NHMP是基于事件的,这导致了发病率的变化。ncis衍生的趋势尤其受到不可用病例数据、潜在编码错误和输入积压的影响。cov和NHMP都没有在其公共领域数据中提供受害者年龄,以便进行年龄调整后的比率比较。结论:现有数据集在确定FVH趋势方面存在局限性;最明显的是NCIS数据的滞后时间。含义:该研究确定了维多利亚州FVH率的指示性上升趋势,表明目前预防和控制FVH的管理和政策设置不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health information management students' work-integrated learning (professional practice placements): Where do they go and what do they do? Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improves coding accuracy: A single-centre prospective study in China. Physicians' acceptance and adoption of mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. The health information management workforce: Looking to the future. Demystifying environmental health-related diseases: Using ICD codes to facilitate environmental health clinical referrals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1