Sex Differences in Outcomes of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Submitted to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia Pub Date : 2023-06-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36660/abc.20220673
Victoria B Milan, Yasmin F S Alves, Guilherme P Machado, Gustavo Neves de Araujo, Ana Maria Krepsky, Angelo Chies, Matheus Niches, Julia Fracasso, Sandro Cadaval Goncalves, Marco Wainstein, Carisi Anne Polanczyk
{"title":"Sex Differences in Outcomes of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Submitted to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Victoria B Milan,&nbsp;Yasmin F S Alves,&nbsp;Guilherme P Machado,&nbsp;Gustavo Neves de Araujo,&nbsp;Ana Maria Krepsky,&nbsp;Angelo Chies,&nbsp;Matheus Niches,&nbsp;Julia Fracasso,&nbsp;Sandro Cadaval Goncalves,&nbsp;Marco Wainstein,&nbsp;Carisi Anne Polanczyk","doi":"10.36660/abc.20220673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have shown that women are usually undertreated and have worse outcomes after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), hence the need to investigate questions related to sex in Brazil to better deal with the problem.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether female sex is still associated with adverse events in a contemporary cohort of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of STEMI patients submitted to pPCI in a tertiary university hospital between March 2011 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into groups based on their sex at birth. The primary clinical outcome was long-term MACCE. Patients were followed-up for up to five years. All hypothesis tests had a two-sided significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1457 patients admitted with STEMI in the study period, 1362 were included and 468 (34.4%) were women. Female patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension (73% vs. 60%, p <0.001), diabetes (32% vs. 25%, p=0.003) and Killip class 3-4 at hospital admission (17% vs. 12%, p=0.01); TIMI risk score was higher among women (4 [2, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5], p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was not different between groups (12.8% vs. 10.5%, p=0.20). In-hospital MACCE (16.0% vs. 12.6%, p=0.085) and long-term MACCE (28.7% vs. 24.4%, p=0.089) were numerically higher in women, with borderline significance. After multivariate analysis, female sex was not associated with MACCE (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.86 - 1.51; p = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a prospective cohort of STEMI patients submitted to pPCI, female patients were older and had more comorbidities at baseline, but no significant differences were found in terms of long-term adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8399,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia","volume":"120 6","pages":"e20220673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20220673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown that women are usually undertreated and have worse outcomes after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), hence the need to investigate questions related to sex in Brazil to better deal with the problem.

Objective: To determine whether female sex is still associated with adverse events in a contemporary cohort of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of STEMI patients submitted to pPCI in a tertiary university hospital between March 2011 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into groups based on their sex at birth. The primary clinical outcome was long-term MACCE. Patients were followed-up for up to five years. All hypothesis tests had a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

Results: Among 1457 patients admitted with STEMI in the study period, 1362 were included and 468 (34.4%) were women. Female patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension (73% vs. 60%, p <0.001), diabetes (32% vs. 25%, p=0.003) and Killip class 3-4 at hospital admission (17% vs. 12%, p=0.01); TIMI risk score was higher among women (4 [2, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5], p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was not different between groups (12.8% vs. 10.5%, p=0.20). In-hospital MACCE (16.0% vs. 12.6%, p=0.085) and long-term MACCE (28.7% vs. 24.4%, p=0.089) were numerically higher in women, with borderline significance. After multivariate analysis, female sex was not associated with MACCE (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.86 - 1.51; p = 0.36).

Conclusion: In a prospective cohort of STEMI patients submitted to pPCI, female patients were older and had more comorbidities at baseline, but no significant differences were found in terms of long-term adverse outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者结局的性别差异。
背景:几项研究表明,女性在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后通常治疗不足,预后更差,因此需要调查巴西与性别有关的问题,以更好地解决这个问题。目的:在接受原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的STEMI患者的当代队列中,确定女性是否仍与不良事件相关。根据患者出生时的性别将其分组。主要临床结果为长期MACCE。对患者进行了长达五年的随访。所有假设检验的双侧显著性水平均为0.05。结果:在研究期间收治的1457名STEMI患者中,1362名患者包括在内,468名(34.4%)为女性。女性患者的高血压患病率较高(73%对60%,p结论:在接受pPCI的STEMI患者的前瞻性队列中,女性患者年龄较大,基线时合并症较多,但在长期不良反应方面没有发现显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
30.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With more than 70 years of existence, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia is the main channel for the dissemination of Brazilian scientific research on cardiovascular sciences. Published in two languages and indexed in major international databases, all scientific contributions are peer-reviewed and reviewed by editorial board members selected among the most reputable researchers in Brazil and abroad. The manuscripts are reviewed according to their relevance and originality, scientific accuracy and level of importance for the advancement of science. With an average time of nine months between the initial submission and the effective publication of the manuscripts, and less than seven months until they are published on PubMed, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia can ensure the quick inclusion of the researchers’ papers in the international literature.
期刊最新文献
Bloqueio de Ramo Alternante a Cada Batimento Uma Causa Rara e Tratamento da Fibrilação Ventricular: Toxicidade do 5-Fluorouracil Os Seis Pilares da Medicina do Estilo de Vida no Manejo de Doenças Não Transmissíveis – As Lacunas nas Diretrizes Atuais Variante da Subunidade Beta 3 da Proteína G ( GNB3 ) Está Associada a Alterações Bioquímicas em Pacientes Brasileiros com Hipertensão Fatores de Risco para Infecção da Ferida Operatória em Pacientes Submetidos à Cirurgia Cardíaca Pediátrica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1