Impact of general practice / family medicine training on Japanese junior residents:a descriptive study.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Fukushima Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.5387/fms.2022-35
Koki Nakamura, Satoshi Kanke, Atsushi Ishii, Fuyuto Mori, Goro Hoshi, Kanako Kanto, Yoshihiro Toyoda, Ryuki Kassai
{"title":"Impact of general practice / family medicine training on Japanese junior residents:a descriptive study.","authors":"Koki Nakamura,&nbsp;Satoshi Kanke,&nbsp;Atsushi Ishii,&nbsp;Fuyuto Mori,&nbsp;Goro Hoshi,&nbsp;Kanako Kanto,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Toyoda,&nbsp;Ryuki Kassai","doi":"10.5387/fms.2022-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite international recognition of the impact of general practice / family medicine training on postgraduate training outcomes, there have been few reports from Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Junior residents who participated in community medicine training for one month between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. The settings were five medical institutions (one hospital and four clinics) that had full-time family doctors. The junior residents were assigned to one of these institutions. The training content mainly consisted of general ambulatory care, home medical care, community-based care, and reflection. The junior residents evaluated themselves at the beginning and end of their training, and the family doctors evaluated the junior residents at the end. The evaluation items were 36 items in 10 areas, based on the objectives outlined in the Guidelines for Residency Training - 2020 Edition, and were rated on a 10-point Likert scale. In the statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed rank test of two related groups was performed to analyze changes between pre and post self-evaluation, and the effect size r was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one junior residents completed the study. Their self-evaluations showed statistically significant increases in all 36 items. The effect size was large in 33 items. The family doctors' evaluation was 8-9 points for all 36 items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General practice / family medicine training may greatly contribute to the acquisition of various required clinical abilities in postgraduate training even in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":44831,"journal":{"name":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/eb/b4/2185-4610-69-133.PMC10480516.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5387/fms.2022-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Despite international recognition of the impact of general practice / family medicine training on postgraduate training outcomes, there have been few reports from Japan.

Methods: Junior residents who participated in community medicine training for one month between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. The settings were five medical institutions (one hospital and four clinics) that had full-time family doctors. The junior residents were assigned to one of these institutions. The training content mainly consisted of general ambulatory care, home medical care, community-based care, and reflection. The junior residents evaluated themselves at the beginning and end of their training, and the family doctors evaluated the junior residents at the end. The evaluation items were 36 items in 10 areas, based on the objectives outlined in the Guidelines for Residency Training - 2020 Edition, and were rated on a 10-point Likert scale. In the statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed rank test of two related groups was performed to analyze changes between pre and post self-evaluation, and the effect size r was calculated.

Results: Ninety-one junior residents completed the study. Their self-evaluations showed statistically significant increases in all 36 items. The effect size was large in 33 items. The family doctors' evaluation was 8-9 points for all 36 items.

Conclusion: General practice / family medicine training may greatly contribute to the acquisition of various required clinical abilities in postgraduate training even in Japan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科/家庭医学培训对日本初级住院医师的影响:一项描述性研究
背景:尽管国际上认识到全科/家庭医学培训对研究生培训结果的影响,但来自日本的报道很少。方法:选取2019 - 2022年期间参加1个月社区医学培训的初级住院医师为研究对象。这些机构包括五家拥有全职家庭医生的医疗机构(一所医院和四家诊所)。初级住院医生被分配到这些机构之一。培训内容主要包括普通门诊护理、家庭医疗护理、社区护理和反思。初级住院医师在培训开始和结束时对自己进行评估,家庭医生在培训结束时对初级住院医师进行评估。根据《住院医师培训指南- 2020年版》中概述的目标,评估项目为10个领域的36个项目,并以10分的李克特量表进行评分。在统计分析中,对两相关组进行Wilcoxon sign rank检验,分析自我评价前后的变化,并计算效应量r。结果:91名初级住院医师完成了研究。他们的自我评价在所有36项上都有统计学上的显著提高。有33个项目的效应量较大。家庭医生对36个项目的评价为8-9分。结论:即使在日本,全科/家庭医学培训对研究生培养所需的各种临床能力的获得也有很大的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Comparison of attitudes toward schizophrenia among medical students and health professionals in Japan and their associated factorsamong medical students: a cross-sectional study. Histological outcome evaluation of selected brain preparation protocols for white fiber dissection. Remote Orthotic Fabrication Method Using Small Three-Dimensional Printers and Computed Tomography Data: A Technical Report. Seven cases illustrating difficulties in the treatment of MPO-ANCA-positive refractory otitis media. Subjective Difficulty with Higher-Level Functional Capacity in Community-Dwelling Older People withMild Cognitive Impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1