Beliefs and Attitudes toward Physician-assisted Suicide among Korean Adults.

In Cheol Hwang, Jung Hun Kang, Won-Chul Kim, Jeanno Park, Hyun Sook Kim, DaeKyun Kim, Kyung Hee Lee
{"title":"Beliefs and Attitudes toward Physician-assisted Suicide among Korean Adults.","authors":"In Cheol Hwang, Jung Hun Kang, Won-Chul Kim, Jeanno Park, Hyun Sook Kim, DaeKyun Kim, Kyung Hee Lee","doi":"10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.4.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To grasp public opinion accurately, we conducted an opinion poll on beliefs and attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide (PAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized telephone survey ensuring a representative sample was conducted, 1,007 participants aged 18 years or older (response rate, 9.5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main results are as follows i) 61.1% of participants thought that the current social support system for terminally ill patients and their families is insufficient; ii) 60% of participants did not recognize the term \"hospice and palliative care\"; iii) 81.7% of participants would not like to receive life-sustaining treatment if there is no possibility of recovery; iv) 58.4% of participants would like to receive hospice and palliative care if they are diagnosed with a terminal illness; v) the priorities for dignified dying were preparing a support system to reduce the burden of care (28.6%), economic support including reduction of medical expenses (26.7%), expansion of hospice and palliative care services (25.4%), and legalization of PAS (13.6%); and vi) 58.3% of participants agreed that the expansion of hospice and palliative care should precede the legalization of PAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Koreans currently want other efforts, including expansion of hospice and palliative care services, instead of the legalization of PAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":73780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"25 4","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/ef/jhpc-25-4-198.PMC10179991.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.4.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To grasp public opinion accurately, we conducted an opinion poll on beliefs and attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide (PAS).

Methods: A randomized telephone survey ensuring a representative sample was conducted, 1,007 participants aged 18 years or older (response rate, 9.5%).

Results: The main results are as follows i) 61.1% of participants thought that the current social support system for terminally ill patients and their families is insufficient; ii) 60% of participants did not recognize the term "hospice and palliative care"; iii) 81.7% of participants would not like to receive life-sustaining treatment if there is no possibility of recovery; iv) 58.4% of participants would like to receive hospice and palliative care if they are diagnosed with a terminal illness; v) the priorities for dignified dying were preparing a support system to reduce the burden of care (28.6%), economic support including reduction of medical expenses (26.7%), expansion of hospice and palliative care services (25.4%), and legalization of PAS (13.6%); and vi) 58.3% of participants agreed that the expansion of hospice and palliative care should precede the legalization of PAS.

Conclusion: Koreans currently want other efforts, including expansion of hospice and palliative care services, instead of the legalization of PAS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国成年人对医生协助自杀的信念和态度。
目的:为了准确把握民意,我们对医生协助自杀(PAS)的信念和态度进行了民意调查:方法:我们进行了一次随机电话调查,确保抽取的样本具有代表性,共有 1 007 名 18 岁或以上的参与者(回复率为 9.5%):主要结果如下:i) 61.1%的参与者认为目前对临终病人及其家属的社会支持系统不足;ii) 60%的参与者不知道 "临终关怀和姑息治疗 "这一术语;iii) 81.7%的参与者不希望在没有康复可能的情况下接受维持生命的治疗;iv) 58.4%的参与者在被诊断出患有绝症时希望接受临终关怀和姑息治疗;v) 有尊严死亡的优先事项是准备一个支持系统以减轻护理负担(28.6%),经济支持包括减少医疗费用(26.7%),扩大临终关怀和姑息治疗服务(25.4%),以及使允许临终关怀和姑息治疗合法化(13.6%);vi) 58.3%的参与者同意在允许临终关怀和姑息治疗合法化之前应扩大临终关怀和姑息治疗服务:结论:韩国人目前希望其他方面的努力,包括扩大临终关怀和姑息治疗服务,而不是使临...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Phased Plan for the Expansion of Hospice and Palliative Care. Content Analysis of Online Resources Regarding Needs for Advance Care Planning. Ethical and Practical Issues with the Use of Antimicrobial Agents during the End of Life. An Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care. Early Hospice Consultation Team Engagement for Cancer Pain Relief: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1