Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_189_22
Mohammad Naser Hashemian, Sadegh Ghafarian, Hamid Riazi-Esfahani, Elias Khalili Pour
{"title":"Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?","authors":"Mohammad Naser Hashemian,&nbsp;Sadegh Ghafarian,&nbsp;Hamid Riazi-Esfahani,&nbsp;Elias Khalili Pour","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_189_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the choroidal structure in keratoconic patients with different severity using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) derived from image binarization on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans (EDI-OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) patients and 72 eyes from 36 healthy subjects were recruited in this prospective, noninterventional, comparative cross-sectional study. EDI-OCT was employed to measure choroidal parameters, including choroidal thickness (CT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area, stromal area, and CVI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subfoveal CT was 354.6 ± 66.8 μm in the control group and 371 ± 64.5 μm in the KCN group (<i>P</i> = 0.86). There was no significant difference between control and KCN groups in terms of TCA (0.66 ± 0.14 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.70), luminal area (0.49 ± 0.10 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 0.53 ± 0.08 mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.67), and stromal area (0.16 ± 0.05 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 0.17 ± 0.05 mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.84). CVI was also comparable in the control group (75.4% ±3.4%) and the KCN group (75.6% ±4.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.43). There was also no significant correlation between other choroidal parameters and KCN severity indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that CVI as well as other choroidal biomarkers were not significantly different between patients with KCN and healthy subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/3d/JCO-35-36.PMC10481970.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_189_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the choroidal structure in keratoconic patients with different severity using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) derived from image binarization on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans (EDI-OCT).

Methods: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) patients and 72 eyes from 36 healthy subjects were recruited in this prospective, noninterventional, comparative cross-sectional study. EDI-OCT was employed to measure choroidal parameters, including choroidal thickness (CT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area, stromal area, and CVI.

Results: Subfoveal CT was 354.6 ± 66.8 μm in the control group and 371 ± 64.5 μm in the KCN group (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between control and KCN groups in terms of TCA (0.66 ± 0.14 mm2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mm2; P = 0.70), luminal area (0.49 ± 0.10 mm2 vs. 0.53 ± 0.08 mm2; P = 0.67), and stromal area (0.16 ± 0.05 mm2 vs. 0.17 ± 0.05 mm2; P = 0.84). CVI was also comparable in the control group (75.4% ±3.4%) and the KCN group (75.6% ±4.5%; P = 0.43). There was also no significant correlation between other choroidal parameters and KCN severity indices.

Conclusion: It seems that CVI as well as other choroidal biomarkers were not significantly different between patients with KCN and healthy subjects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆锥角膜患者脉络膜血管指数的评价:圆锥角膜患者脉络膜血管是否发生改变?
目的:利用增强深度成像光学相干断层扫描(edii - oct)图像二值化所得的脉络膜血管指数(CVI)研究不同严重程度角膜创面患者的脉络膜结构。方法:采用前瞻性、非介入性、横断面对比研究方法,选取34例圆锥角膜患者的68只眼和36例健康受试者的72只眼。采用EDI-OCT测量脉络膜参数,包括脉络膜厚度(CT)、总脉络膜面积(TCA)、管腔面积、间质面积、CVI。结果:对照组CT为354.6±66.8 μm, KCN组CT为371±64.5 μm (P = 0.86)。对照组与KCN组TCA无显著差异(0.66±0.14 mm2 vs. 0.7±0.12 mm2;P = 0.70),管腔面积(0.49±0.10 mm2 vs. 0.53±0.08 mm2;P = 0.67),基质面积(0.16±0.05 mm2 vs. 0.17±0.05 mm2;P = 0.84)。CVI在对照组(75.4%±3.4%)和KCN组(75.6%±4.5%)也具有可比性;P = 0.43)。其他脉络膜参数与KCN严重程度指标也无显著相关性。结论:KCN患者的CVI及其他脉络膜生物标志物与健康人无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Intracameral Injection of Methotrexate for Treatment of Epithelial Ingrowth. Hereditary Multiple Exostoses with Rare Ocular Finding: A Case Report. Iris-Claw Anterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Explantation: A Case Series. Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Bilateral Symmetrical Superior Oblique Nasal Tenotomy in Patients of Large A-Pattern Exotropia. Low Ocular Perfusion Pressure Values at Rest and during Resistance Exercise in Offspring of Glaucoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1