Platelet rich plasma use for treatment of acne scars: an overview of systematic reviews.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Blood Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI:10.2450/BloodTransfus.536
Mario Cruciani, Francesca Masiello, Ilaria Pati, Simonetta Pupella, Vincenzo De Angelis
{"title":"Platelet rich plasma use for treatment of acne scars: an overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Mario Cruciani, Francesca Masiello, Ilaria Pati, Simonetta Pupella, Vincenzo De Angelis","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A reappraisal of the conclusions of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses validity related to Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to regimens PRP-free for the treatment of acne scars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An overview of SRs. The methodological quality of the reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2 checklist; quality of the evidence of primary studies was appraised following the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen SRs were included in this overview. Data were from 124 overlapping reports, based on 34 individual primary studies (10 parallel arm randomized trials, 21 split-face studies, and 3 uncontrolled studies). Most of the studies evaluated combination of PRP with microneedling or with laser therapy compared to microneedling or laser therapy without PRP. Clinical improvement (reported as degree of improvement or improvement score) and patient's satisfaction rate were significantly higher in PRP recipients compared to controls. Crusting time and duration of erythema were significantly shorter in PRP recipients compared to controls. Most of the reviews considered in this overview can be considered of low methodological quality due to the fact that several critical methodological requirements of AMSTAR-2 checklist were unmet or partially met; only 6 of the 15 reviews incorporated study quality in their conclusions, and no GRADE assessment was performed for the reported outcomes in any of the SRs. With the GRADE approach, the quality of the evidence for the outcomes analysed ranged from very low to low due to risk of bias in the primary studies, inconsistency between the studies, and imprecision.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The low or very low certainty of evidence does not support clear clinical decision about the PRP use in combination with microneedling or laser therapy for the treatment of acne scars. Further well-designed studies are required to improve the evidence base for PRP combination therapy for acne scars.</p>","PeriodicalId":49260,"journal":{"name":"Blood Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"226-238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A reappraisal of the conclusions of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses validity related to Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to regimens PRP-free for the treatment of acne scars.

Materials and methods: An overview of SRs. The methodological quality of the reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2 checklist; quality of the evidence of primary studies was appraised following the GRADE approach.

Results: Fifteen SRs were included in this overview. Data were from 124 overlapping reports, based on 34 individual primary studies (10 parallel arm randomized trials, 21 split-face studies, and 3 uncontrolled studies). Most of the studies evaluated combination of PRP with microneedling or with laser therapy compared to microneedling or laser therapy without PRP. Clinical improvement (reported as degree of improvement or improvement score) and patient's satisfaction rate were significantly higher in PRP recipients compared to controls. Crusting time and duration of erythema were significantly shorter in PRP recipients compared to controls. Most of the reviews considered in this overview can be considered of low methodological quality due to the fact that several critical methodological requirements of AMSTAR-2 checklist were unmet or partially met; only 6 of the 15 reviews incorporated study quality in their conclusions, and no GRADE assessment was performed for the reported outcomes in any of the SRs. With the GRADE approach, the quality of the evidence for the outcomes analysed ranged from very low to low due to risk of bias in the primary studies, inconsistency between the studies, and imprecision.

Discussion: The low or very low certainty of evidence does not support clear clinical decision about the PRP use in combination with microneedling or laser therapy for the treatment of acne scars. Further well-designed studies are required to improve the evidence base for PRP combination therapy for acne scars.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富血小板血浆用于治疗痤疮疤痕:系统综述。
背景:重新评估与富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗痤疮疤痕相关的系统性综述(SR)和荟萃分析的有效性结论,与不含PRP的治疗方案进行比较:研究综述。采用AMSTAR-2检查表评估综述的方法学质量;采用GRADE方法评估主要研究的证据质量:本综述共收录了 15 篇研究报告。数据来自 124 份重叠报告,基于 34 项单独的主要研究(10 项平行臂随机试验、21 项分面研究和 3 项无对照研究)。大多数研究评估了 PRP 与微针疗法或激光疗法的组合,并与不含 PRP 的微针疗法或激光疗法进行了比较。与对照组相比,PRP 受试者的临床改善(以改善程度或改善评分报告)和患者满意度明显更高。与对照组相比,PRP 接受者的结痂时间和红斑持续时间明显更短。本综述中考虑的大多数综述可被视为方法学质量较低,原因是未满足或部分满足 AMSTAR-2 检查表中的几项关键方法学要求;15 篇综述中只有 6 篇在结论中纳入了研究质量,而且没有任何一篇 SR 对报告的结果进行 GRADE 评估。根据 GRADE 方法,由于主要研究存在偏倚风险、研究之间不一致以及不精确,所分析结果的证据质量从很低到很低不等:讨论:较低或极低的证据确定性并不支持临床对 PRP 与微针或激光疗法结合使用治疗痤疮疤痕做出明确的决定。需要进一步开展设计良好的研究,以完善PRP联合疗法治疗痤疮疤痕的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Blood Transfusion welcomes international submissions of Original Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports and Letters on all the fields related to Transfusion Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of oral platelet lysate gel to treat oral mucosal manifestations associated with chronic graft versus host disease. Tranexamic acid in hip fracture repair surgery: safe and effective? Management of preoperative anemia: iron replacement. Implementing first pillar of PBM in the Emergency Area: a missed opportunity? Management of postpartum anemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1