Decision Tree Model for Predicting Hospice Palliative Care Use in Terminal Cancer Patients.

Hee-Ja Lee, Im-Il Na, Kyung-Ah Kang
{"title":"Decision Tree Model for Predicting Hospice Palliative Care Use in Terminal Cancer Patients.","authors":"Hee-Ja Lee,&nbsp;Im-Il Na,&nbsp;Kyung-Ah Kang","doi":"10.14475/jhpc.2021.24.3.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study attempted to develop clinical guidelines to help patients use hospice and palliative care (HPC) at an appropriate time after writing physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) by identifying the characteristics of HPC use of patients with terminal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted to understand the characteristics of HPC use of patients with terminal cancer through decision tree analysis. The participants were 394 terminal cancer patients who were hospitalized at a cancer-specialized hospital in Seoul, South Korea and wrote POLST from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predictive model for the characteristics of HPC use showed three main nodes (living together, pain control, and period to death after writing POLST). The decision tree analysis of HPC use by terminal cancer patients showed that the most likely group to use HPC use was terminal cancer patients who had a cohabitant, received pain control, and died 2 months or more after writing a POLST. The probability of HPC usage rate in this group was 87.5%. The next most likely group to use HPC had a cohabitant and received pain control; 64.8% of this group used HPC. Finally, 55.1% of participants who had a cohabitant used HPC, which was a significantly higher proportion than that of participants who did not have a cohabitant (1.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides meaningful clinical evidence to help make decisions on HPC use more easily at an appropriate time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"24 3","pages":"184-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/d1/jhpc-24-3-184.PMC10180062.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/jhpc.2021.24.3.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempted to develop clinical guidelines to help patients use hospice and palliative care (HPC) at an appropriate time after writing physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) by identifying the characteristics of HPC use of patients with terminal cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted to understand the characteristics of HPC use of patients with terminal cancer through decision tree analysis. The participants were 394 terminal cancer patients who were hospitalized at a cancer-specialized hospital in Seoul, South Korea and wrote POLST from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021.

Results: The predictive model for the characteristics of HPC use showed three main nodes (living together, pain control, and period to death after writing POLST). The decision tree analysis of HPC use by terminal cancer patients showed that the most likely group to use HPC use was terminal cancer patients who had a cohabitant, received pain control, and died 2 months or more after writing a POLST. The probability of HPC usage rate in this group was 87.5%. The next most likely group to use HPC had a cohabitant and received pain control; 64.8% of this group used HPC. Finally, 55.1% of participants who had a cohabitant used HPC, which was a significantly higher proportion than that of participants who did not have a cohabitant (1.7%).

Conclusion: This study provides meaningful clinical evidence to help make decisions on HPC use more easily at an appropriate time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测晚期癌症病人安宁疗护使用之决策树模型。
目的:本研究试图通过了解晚期癌症患者使用临终关怀和姑息治疗(HPC)的特点,制定临床指南,帮助患者在书写维持生命治疗医嘱(POLST)后,在适当的时间使用HPC。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,通过决策树分析了解晚期癌症患者使用HPC的特点。参与者是在2019年1月1日至2021年3月31日期间在韩国首尔一家癌症专科医院住院的394名晚期癌症患者,他们填写了POLST。结果:HPC使用特征的预测模型显示了三个主要节点(共同生活、疼痛控制和写POLST后的死亡时间)。晚期癌症患者使用HPC的决策树分析显示,最有可能使用HPC的群体是有同居者、接受疼痛控制、在写POLST后2个月或更长时间死亡的晚期癌症患者。本组HPC使用率为87.5%。下一个最有可能使用HPC的组有一个同居者并接受疼痛控制;64.8%的患者使用HPC。最后,55.1%有同居者使用HPC,明显高于无同居者(1.7%)。结论:本研究为HPC的使用决策提供了有意义的临床依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Phased Plan for the Expansion of Hospice and Palliative Care. Content Analysis of Online Resources Regarding Needs for Advance Care Planning. Ethical and Practical Issues with the Use of Antimicrobial Agents during the End of Life. An Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care. Early Hospice Consultation Team Engagement for Cancer Pain Relief: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1