Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/tohm.775
Chiahao Lu, Dhira Khosla, Alexander Kent, Helen M Bronte-Stewart, Kathryn H Rosenbluth
{"title":"Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up.","authors":"Chiahao Lu,&nbsp;Dhira Khosla,&nbsp;Alexander Kent,&nbsp;Helen M Bronte-Stewart,&nbsp;Kathryn H Rosenbluth","doi":"10.5334/tohm.775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). This retrospective post-market analysis evaluated the usage, effectiveness, and safety of TAPS in patients using TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study personnel screened a manufacturer's database for TAPS devices that had been prescribed for the treatment of ET and used beyond a 90-day trial period between August 2019 and January 2023. The device logs were collected to extract the therapy usage, accelerometry measurements, and on-board ratings of tremor improvement. Study personnel also evaluated results of a voluntary survey requested by the manufacturer after the 90-day trial period. Adverse events were assessed from patients' complaints reported to the manufacturer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,223 patients in the manufacturer's database met the study criteria. The patients had used therapy between 90 and 1,233 days, with average usage of 5.6 sessions per week. Accelerometry data indicated 89% of patients experienced tremor improvement, with an average 64% improvement. 63% of patients rated at least half of their sessions as improved. No significant habituation was observed in patients who used therapy for more than one year. Approximately 62% of survey respondents either had reduced medication or planned to consult physicians about their medication usage. No serious safety events were reported, and 10% of patients reported minor safety complaints.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The analysis demonstrates the real-world effectiveness and safety of TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period over a longer timeframe and in a larger population size than previously published evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23317,"journal":{"name":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473165/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). This retrospective post-market analysis evaluated the usage, effectiveness, and safety of TAPS in patients using TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period in a real-world setting.

Methods: Study personnel screened a manufacturer's database for TAPS devices that had been prescribed for the treatment of ET and used beyond a 90-day trial period between August 2019 and January 2023. The device logs were collected to extract the therapy usage, accelerometry measurements, and on-board ratings of tremor improvement. Study personnel also evaluated results of a voluntary survey requested by the manufacturer after the 90-day trial period. Adverse events were assessed from patients' complaints reported to the manufacturer.

Results: A total of 1,223 patients in the manufacturer's database met the study criteria. The patients had used therapy between 90 and 1,233 days, with average usage of 5.6 sessions per week. Accelerometry data indicated 89% of patients experienced tremor improvement, with an average 64% improvement. 63% of patients rated at least half of their sessions as improved. No significant habituation was observed in patients who used therapy for more than one year. Approximately 62% of survey respondents either had reduced medication or planned to consult physicians about their medication usage. No serious safety events were reported, and 10% of patients reported minor safety complaints.

Discussion: The analysis demonstrates the real-world effectiveness and safety of TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period over a longer timeframe and in a larger population size than previously published evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮传入模式刺激特发性震颤:长期随访的真实世界证据。
背景:经皮传入模式刺激(TAPS)是治疗特发性震颤(ET)患者手部震颤的一种非侵入性神经调节疗法。这项回顾性上市后分析评估了在现实环境中使用tap超过90天试验期的患者中tap的使用、有效性和安全性。方法:研究人员筛选了制造商数据库中用于治疗ET的TAPS设备,并在2019年8月至2023年1月期间超过90天的试验期。收集设备日志以提取治疗使用、加速度测量和机载震颤改善评级。在90天的试验期后,研究人员还对制造商要求的自愿调查结果进行了评估。根据患者向制造商报告的投诉对不良事件进行评估。结果:制造商数据库中共有1223例患者符合研究标准。这些患者接受了90至1233天的治疗,平均每周接受5.6次治疗。加速测量数据显示89%的患者震颤得到改善,平均改善64%。63%的患者认为至少有一半的疗程得到了改善。在使用治疗超过一年的患者中没有观察到明显的习惯化。大约62%的受访者减少了用药或计划向医生咨询他们的用药情况。没有严重的安全事件报告,10%的患者报告了轻微的安全投诉。讨论:该分析表明,与之前发表的证据相比,在更长时间和更大的人群规模上,超过90天试验期的TAPS在现实世界中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tremor Following Guillain Barré Syndrome. Caffeine Use in Huntington's Disease: A Single Center Survey. Patient Selection for Deep Brain Stimulation for Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration. A Case of a Patient With MYH2-Associated Myopathy Presenting With a Chief Complaint of Hand Tremor. Six Myths and Misconceptions about Essential Tremor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1