Cost-effectiveness of selective caries removal versus stepwise excavation for deep caries lesions.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Brazilian Oral Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0083
Juliana Jobim Jardim, Luana Severo Alves, Roberto Frota Decourt, Lilian Marly de Paula, Heliana Dantas Mestrinho, Marisa Maltz
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of selective caries removal versus stepwise excavation for deep caries lesions.","authors":"Juliana Jobim Jardim,&nbsp;Luana Severo Alves,&nbsp;Roberto Frota Decourt,&nbsp;Lilian Marly de Paula,&nbsp;Heliana Dantas Mestrinho,&nbsp;Marisa Maltz","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of two treatments for deep caries lesions in permanent molars - selective caries removal (SCR) to soft dentin with restoration in a single visit, and stepwise excavation (SW) - regarding pulp vitality for a 5-year follow-up period. The present study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. Treatments were conducted in two Brazilian cities (Brasília and Porto Alegre). At baseline, 299 permanent molars (233 patients) were treated and 229 teeth (174 patients) were evaluated after 5 years. The discounted cash flow method was adopted. The total cost of each treatment was calculated, and the failure cost (endodontic treatment + restoration) was added to the final cost, according to the 5-year failure rates of each therapy (20% for SCR and 44% for SW). A public health service unit composed of three dentists in 4-hour work shifts was used to calculate the monetary value of the treatments, assuming a total of 528 treatments/month. Considering the 229 teeth evaluated after 5 years (115 SCR and 114 SW), SCR provided savings of 43% (amalgam) and 41% (resin composite) per treatment, compared to SW. The SCR technique provides benefits for public finances (direct economy) and for public health services (increase in the number of treatments performed). Considering that maximizing profit and reducing costs are powerful motivating factors for adopting a certain treatment, this study provides data to better support the decision-making process, regarding the management of deep caries lesions in permanent molars.</p>","PeriodicalId":48942,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of two treatments for deep caries lesions in permanent molars - selective caries removal (SCR) to soft dentin with restoration in a single visit, and stepwise excavation (SW) - regarding pulp vitality for a 5-year follow-up period. The present study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. Treatments were conducted in two Brazilian cities (Brasília and Porto Alegre). At baseline, 299 permanent molars (233 patients) were treated and 229 teeth (174 patients) were evaluated after 5 years. The discounted cash flow method was adopted. The total cost of each treatment was calculated, and the failure cost (endodontic treatment + restoration) was added to the final cost, according to the 5-year failure rates of each therapy (20% for SCR and 44% for SW). A public health service unit composed of three dentists in 4-hour work shifts was used to calculate the monetary value of the treatments, assuming a total of 528 treatments/month. Considering the 229 teeth evaluated after 5 years (115 SCR and 114 SW), SCR provided savings of 43% (amalgam) and 41% (resin composite) per treatment, compared to SW. The SCR technique provides benefits for public finances (direct economy) and for public health services (increase in the number of treatments performed). Considering that maximizing profit and reducing costs are powerful motivating factors for adopting a certain treatment, this study provides data to better support the decision-making process, regarding the management of deep caries lesions in permanent molars.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性龋齿去除与深度龋齿病变逐步挖掘的成本效益。
一项多中心随机对照临床试验评估了两种治疗恒磨牙深部龋齿病变的有效性:一次就诊的软牙本质选择性龋齿去除(SCR)和逐步挖掘(SW) -关于牙髓活力的5年随访期。本研究旨在确定这些治疗的成本效益。治疗在两个巴西城市(Brasília和Porto Alegre)进行。在基线时,治疗了299颗恒磨牙(233名患者),5年后评估了229颗牙齿(174名患者)。采用现金流量折现法。计算每种治疗的总成本,并根据每种治疗的5年失败率(SCR为20%,SW为44%)将失败成本(根管治疗+修复)添加到最终成本中。以一个由三名牙医组成的公共卫生服务单位为单位,每班工作四小时,计算治疗的货币价值,假设每月总共接受528次治疗。考虑到5年后评估的229颗牙齿(115颗SCR和114颗SW),与SW相比,SCR每次治疗可节省43%(汞合金)和41%(树脂复合材料)。SCR技术为公共财政(直接经济)和公共卫生服务(增加治疗次数)带来好处。考虑到利润最大化和成本降低是采用某种治疗方法的强大激励因素,本研究提供的数据可以更好地支持恒磨牙深部龋病治疗的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Oral Research
Brazilian Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Virtual learning object about oral ulcerative lesions: controlled educational intervention study. Braz. Oral Res. 2023:37:e118. Comparative study of sex estimates in adult skulls using direct measurement and tomographic image reconstruction. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e064. Association among COVID-19, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and oral health status. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e072. Evaluation of peripheral nerve fibers and mast cells in burning mouth syndrome. Erratum: Evaluation of the expression of nerve fiber markers in healthy and inflamed dental pulp. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1