Year in review: tips for effective graduate medical education programme leadership and management.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1136/leader-2022-000724
William Rainey Johnson, Adam M Barelski, John G Blickle, Melanie L Wiseman, Joshua Hartzell
{"title":"Year in review: tips for effective graduate medical education programme leadership and management.","authors":"William Rainey Johnson, Adam M Barelski, John G Blickle, Melanie L Wiseman, Joshua Hartzell","doi":"10.1136/leader-2022-000724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Programme leaders in graduate medical education (GME) are responsible for the final stage of physician training, guiding the transition from supervised to independent practice. The influence of GME programme leaders extends beyond clinical practice, affecting trainees' relationship with and attitudes towards the healthcare system, future leadership behaviours, work-life prioritisations and professional identity among others. Given the potential magnitude of GME programme leaders' impact, both positive and negative, on GME trainees, we reflected on our shared leadership model that developed iteratively as a leadership team. We draw on our experiences to emphasise practical leadership behaviours and provide a summary of our observations, leading to nine recommendations for effective GME programme leadership and associated suggestions for implementation. We divide our recommendations into four leadership recommendations and five management recommendations. Throughout, we highlight the process of developing our shared leadership model, recognising that our process and observations will aid leadership teams in evaluating and, potentially, adapting our recommendations to meet their needs. We anticipate that leaders and leadership teams at every level will find value in our recommendations, even if our intended audience is GME leaders from chief residents to programme directors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Programme leaders in graduate medical education (GME) are responsible for the final stage of physician training, guiding the transition from supervised to independent practice. The influence of GME programme leaders extends beyond clinical practice, affecting trainees' relationship with and attitudes towards the healthcare system, future leadership behaviours, work-life prioritisations and professional identity among others. Given the potential magnitude of GME programme leaders' impact, both positive and negative, on GME trainees, we reflected on our shared leadership model that developed iteratively as a leadership team. We draw on our experiences to emphasise practical leadership behaviours and provide a summary of our observations, leading to nine recommendations for effective GME programme leadership and associated suggestions for implementation. We divide our recommendations into four leadership recommendations and five management recommendations. Throughout, we highlight the process of developing our shared leadership model, recognising that our process and observations will aid leadership teams in evaluating and, potentially, adapting our recommendations to meet their needs. We anticipate that leaders and leadership teams at every level will find value in our recommendations, even if our intended audience is GME leaders from chief residents to programme directors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年度回顾:有效领导和管理研究生医学教育计划的技巧。
医学研究生教育(GME)项目的负责人负责医生培训的最后阶段,指导学员从接受指导过渡到独立执业。研究生医学教育项目带头人的影响超出了临床实践,会影响到学员与医疗系统的关系、对医疗系统的态度、未来的领导行为、工作与生活的优先顺序以及职业认同感等。考虑到 GME 项目领导对 GME 学员的潜在影响(包括正面和负面影响),我们对作为一个领导团队迭代发展起来的共同领导模式进行了反思。我们借鉴我们的经验,强调切实可行的领导行为,并对我们的观察进行了总结,从而提出了九项关于有效领导普通高等教育项目的建议以及相关的实施建议。我们将建议分为四项领导建议和五项管理建议。在整个过程中,我们强调了共同领导力模型的开发过程,认识到我们的过程和观察结果将有助于领导团队评估和调整我们的建议,以满足他们的需求。我们预计,即使我们的目标受众是从住院总医师到项目主任的 GME 领导者,各级领导者和领导团队也会从我们的建议中发现价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Religious identity-based discrimination in the physician workforce: findings from a survey of Muslim physicians in the UK. Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS. Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology. Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies. 'Can you have it all?' Exploring perceived gender roles in leadership through the lens of the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer's clinical fellows 2023/24.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1