Motor corticospinal excitability abnormalities differ between distinct chronic low back pain syndromes

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102853
Marcelo Luiz da Silva , Ana Mércia Fernandes , Valquíria A. Silva , Ricardo Galhardoni , Valter Felau , Joaci O. de Araujo , Jefferson Rosi Jr , Roger S. Brock , Gabriel T. Kubota , Manoel J. Teixeira , Lin T Yeng , Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
{"title":"Motor corticospinal excitability abnormalities differ between distinct chronic low back pain syndromes","authors":"Marcelo Luiz da Silva ,&nbsp;Ana Mércia Fernandes ,&nbsp;Valquíria A. Silva ,&nbsp;Ricardo Galhardoni ,&nbsp;Valter Felau ,&nbsp;Joaci O. de Araujo ,&nbsp;Jefferson Rosi Jr ,&nbsp;Roger S. Brock ,&nbsp;Gabriel T. Kubota ,&nbsp;Manoel J. Teixeira ,&nbsp;Lin T Yeng ,&nbsp;Daniel Ciampi de Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>It is not known whether cortical plastic changes reported in low-back pain (LBP) are present in all etiologies of LBP. Here we report on the assessment of patients with three LBP conditions: non-specific-LBP (ns-LBP), failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), and sciatica (Sc).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients underwent a standardized assessment of clinical pain, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and measures of motor evoked potential (MEPs)-based motor corticospinal excitability (CE) by transcranial magnetic stimulation, including short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Comparisons were also made with normative data from sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>60 patients (42 women, 55.1±9.1 years old) with LBP were included (20 in each group). Pain intensity was higher in patients with neuropathic pain [FBSS (6.8±1.3), and Sc (6.4±1.4)] than in those with ns-LBP (4.7±1.0, P&lt;0.001). The same was shown for pain interference (5.9±2.0, 5.9±1.8, 3.2±1.9, P&lt;0.001), disability (16.4±3.3, 16.3±4.3, 10.4±4.3, P&lt;0.001), and catastrophism (31.1±12.3, 33.0±10.4, 17.4±10.7, P&lt;0.001) scores for FBSS, Sc, and ns-LBP groups, respectively. Patients with neuropathic pain (FBSS, Sc) had lower CPM (-14.8±1.9, -14.1±16.7, respectively) compared to ns-LBP (-25.4±16.6; P&lt;0.02). 80.0% of the FBSS group had defective ICF compared to the other two groups (52.5% for ns-LBP, P=0.025 and 52.5% for Sc, P=0.046). MEPs (140%-rest motor threshold) were low in 50.0% of patients in the FBSS group compared to 20.0% of ns-LBP (P=0.018) and 15.0% of Sc (P=0.001) groups. Higher MEPs were correlated with mood scores (r=0.489), and with lower neuropathic pain symptom scores(r=-0.415) in FBSS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Different types of LBP were associated with different clinical, CPM and CE profiles, which were not uniquely related to the presence of neuropathic pain. These results highlight the need to further characterize patients with LBP in psychophysics and cortical neurophysiology studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"53 3","pages":"Article 102853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

It is not known whether cortical plastic changes reported in low-back pain (LBP) are present in all etiologies of LBP. Here we report on the assessment of patients with three LBP conditions: non-specific-LBP (ns-LBP), failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), and sciatica (Sc).

Methods

Patients underwent a standardized assessment of clinical pain, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and measures of motor evoked potential (MEPs)-based motor corticospinal excitability (CE) by transcranial magnetic stimulation, including short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Comparisons were also made with normative data from sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers.

Results

60 patients (42 women, 55.1±9.1 years old) with LBP were included (20 in each group). Pain intensity was higher in patients with neuropathic pain [FBSS (6.8±1.3), and Sc (6.4±1.4)] than in those with ns-LBP (4.7±1.0, P<0.001). The same was shown for pain interference (5.9±2.0, 5.9±1.8, 3.2±1.9, P<0.001), disability (16.4±3.3, 16.3±4.3, 10.4±4.3, P<0.001), and catastrophism (31.1±12.3, 33.0±10.4, 17.4±10.7, P<0.001) scores for FBSS, Sc, and ns-LBP groups, respectively. Patients with neuropathic pain (FBSS, Sc) had lower CPM (-14.8±1.9, -14.1±16.7, respectively) compared to ns-LBP (-25.4±16.6; P<0.02). 80.0% of the FBSS group had defective ICF compared to the other two groups (52.5% for ns-LBP, P=0.025 and 52.5% for Sc, P=0.046). MEPs (140%-rest motor threshold) were low in 50.0% of patients in the FBSS group compared to 20.0% of ns-LBP (P=0.018) and 15.0% of Sc (P=0.001) groups. Higher MEPs were correlated with mood scores (r=0.489), and with lower neuropathic pain symptom scores(r=-0.415) in FBSS.

Conclusions

Different types of LBP were associated with different clinical, CPM and CE profiles, which were not uniquely related to the presence of neuropathic pain. These results highlight the need to further characterize patients with LBP in psychophysics and cortical neurophysiology studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同慢性腰痛综合征的运动皮质脊髓兴奋性异常不同
目的目前尚不清楚下背痛(LBP)的皮质可塑性变化是否存在于所有LBP病因中。在此,我们报告了对患有三种LBP疾病的患者的评估:非特异性LBP(ns-LBP)、背部手术失败综合征(FBSS)和坐骨神经痛(Sc),包括短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)和皮质内促进(ICF)。还与来自性别和年龄匹配的健康志愿者的标准数据进行了比较。结果纳入60例LBP患者(42例,55.1±9.1岁)(每组20例)。神经性疼痛患者的疼痛强度[FBSS(6.8±1.3)和Sc(6.4±1.4)]高于ns LBP患者(4.7±1.0,P<;0.001)。FBSS、Sc和ns LBP组的疼痛干扰(5.9±2.0、5.9±1.8、3.2±1.9,P>;0.001)、残疾(16.4±3.3、16.3±4.3、10.4±4.3,P<!0.001)和灾难性(31.1±12.3、33.0±10.4、17.4±10.7,P<,分别地与ns LBP(-25.4±16.6;P<;0.02)相比,神经性疼痛(FBSS,Sc)患者的CPM较低(分别为-14.8±1.9,-14.1±16.7)。与其他两组相比,FBSS组80.0%的患者ICF有缺陷(ns LBP为52.5%,P=0.025,Sc为52.5%(P=0.046))。FBSS组50.0%的患者的MEP(140%-静息运动阈值)较低,而ns LBP则为20.0%(P=0.018),15.0%Sc组(P=0.001)。FBSS中较高的MEP与情绪评分(r=0.489)和较低的神经性疼痛症状评分(r=-0.415)相关。结论不同类型的LBP与不同的临床、CPM和CE特征相关,这些特征与神经性疼痛的存在并不是唯一相关的。这些结果强调了在心理物理学和皮层神经生理学研究中进一步表征LBP患者的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1