Continuous theta-burst stimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102896
Lale Gundogdu Celebi, Nermin Gorkem Sirin, Ayse Deniz Elmali, Betul Baykan, Ali Emre Oge, Nerses Bebek
{"title":"Continuous theta-burst stimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study","authors":"Lale Gundogdu Celebi,&nbsp;Nermin Gorkem Sirin,&nbsp;Ayse Deniz Elmali,&nbsp;Betul Baykan,&nbsp;Ali Emre Oge,&nbsp;Nerses Bebek","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twelve patients with DRE (five with idiopathic generalized and seven with focal epilepsy) were included in this cross-over design study and randomized to either first sham or first active stimulation, each applied for 5 consecutive days. A round coil over the vertex was used in generalized epilepsy or a figure-of-8 coil over the “epileptogenic area” in focal epilepsy. Sham stimulation was given by placing the coil 90° perpendicular to the head. The number of seizures, electroencephalography findings, Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-84), and Symptom Check List (SCL-90) scores evaluated during the 8–12 weeks before and after active and sham stimulations were compared statistically.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight patients could complete both active and sham stimulation periods of 5 days and two patients completed active stimulation sessions, without any significant adverse effects. The number of seizures significantly reduced after active cTBS, but not after sham stimulation, when compared with those recorded before the stimulation period. QOLIE scores were increased, but interictal epileptiform discharges and SCL-90 scores showed no difference after cTBS. Active stimulation was stopped in one patient after he experienced an aggravation of myoclonic seizures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>cTBS seemed to be relatively safe and gave promising results in reducing the frequency of seizures in patients with both generalized and focal DRE. This time-saving technique may ease the introduction of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation into the routine practice of busy epilepsy clinics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"53 3","pages":"Article 102896"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

Methods

Twelve patients with DRE (five with idiopathic generalized and seven with focal epilepsy) were included in this cross-over design study and randomized to either first sham or first active stimulation, each applied for 5 consecutive days. A round coil over the vertex was used in generalized epilepsy or a figure-of-8 coil over the “epileptogenic area” in focal epilepsy. Sham stimulation was given by placing the coil 90° perpendicular to the head. The number of seizures, electroencephalography findings, Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-84), and Symptom Check List (SCL-90) scores evaluated during the 8–12 weeks before and after active and sham stimulations were compared statistically.

Results

Eight patients could complete both active and sham stimulation periods of 5 days and two patients completed active stimulation sessions, without any significant adverse effects. The number of seizures significantly reduced after active cTBS, but not after sham stimulation, when compared with those recorded before the stimulation period. QOLIE scores were increased, but interictal epileptiform discharges and SCL-90 scores showed no difference after cTBS. Active stimulation was stopped in one patient after he experienced an aggravation of myoclonic seizures.

Conclusions

cTBS seemed to be relatively safe and gave promising results in reducing the frequency of seizures in patients with both generalized and focal DRE. This time-saving technique may ease the introduction of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation into the routine practice of busy epilepsy clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗药性癫痫患者的持续θ突发刺激:一项单盲安慰剂对照交叉试验研究
目的评价连续θ突发刺激(cTBS)对耐药癫痫(DRE)患者的治疗效果。方法将12例DRE患者(5例为特发性全身性癫痫,7例为局灶性癫痫)纳入交叉设计研究,随机分为第一次假刺激或第一次主动刺激,每次连续5天。在全身性癫痫中使用顶点上的圆形线圈,在局灶性癫痫中,使用“致痫区”上的8字形线圈。通过将线圈垂直于头部放置90°来进行Sham刺激。对主动刺激和假刺激前后8-12周的癫痫发作次数、脑电图检查结果、癫痫生活质量量表(QOLIE-84)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)评分进行统计学比较。结果8例患者可同时完成主动和假刺激5天,2例患者完成主动刺激,无明显不良反应。与刺激期前记录的癫痫发作次数相比,主动cTBS后癫痫发作次数显著减少,但假刺激后癫痫发作数量没有减少。cTBS后QOLIE评分增加,但发作间期癫痫样放电和SCL-90评分无差异。一名患者在经历肌阵挛发作加重后停止了主动刺激。结论scTBS在降低全身性和局灶性DRE患者癫痫发作频率方面相对安全,效果良好。这种节省时间的技术可能会简化将重复经颅磁刺激引入繁忙癫痫诊所的常规实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1