The acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a walking intervention for older people with persistent musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A mixed methods evaluation of the iPOPP pilot trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1002/msc.1815
Emma L Healey, John McBeth, Elaine Nicholls, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Stephen Dent, Nadine E Foster, Daniel Herron, Tamar Pincus, Liz Hartshorne, Elaine M Hay, Clare Jinks
{"title":"The acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a walking intervention for older people with persistent musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A mixed methods evaluation of the iPOPP pilot trial.","authors":"Emma L Healey, John McBeth, Elaine Nicholls, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Stephen Dent, Nadine E Foster, Daniel Herron, Tamar Pincus, Liz Hartshorne, Elaine M Hay, Clare Jinks","doi":"10.1002/msc.1815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is associated with physical inactivity in older people. While walking is an acceptable form of physical activity, the effectiveness of walking interventions in this population has yet to be established.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of a healthcare assistant-led walking intervention for older people with persistent MSK pain (iPOPP) in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method, three arm pilot RCT was conducted in four general practices and recruited patients aged ≥65 years with persistent MSK pain. Participants were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to: (i) usual care, (ii) usual care plus a pedometer intervention, or (iii) usual care plus the iPOPP walking intervention. Descriptive statistics were used in an exploratory analysis of the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. A triangulation protocol was used to integrate the analyses from the mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All pre-specified success criteria were achieved in terms of feasibility (recruitment, follow-up and iPOPP intervention adherence) and acceptability. Triangulation of the data identified the need, in the future, to make the iPOPP training (for intervention deliverers) more patient-centred to better support already active patients and the use of individualised goal setting and improve accelerometry data collection processes to increase the amount of valid data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot trial suggests that the iPOPP intervention and a future full-scale RCT are both acceptable and feasible. The use of a triangulation protocol enabled more robust conclusions about acceptability and feasibility to be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":" ","pages":"1372-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is associated with physical inactivity in older people. While walking is an acceptable form of physical activity, the effectiveness of walking interventions in this population has yet to be established.

Objectives: To assess the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of a healthcare assistant-led walking intervention for older people with persistent MSK pain (iPOPP) in primary care.

Methods: A mixed method, three arm pilot RCT was conducted in four general practices and recruited patients aged ≥65 years with persistent MSK pain. Participants were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to: (i) usual care, (ii) usual care plus a pedometer intervention, or (iii) usual care plus the iPOPP walking intervention. Descriptive statistics were used in an exploratory analysis of the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. A triangulation protocol was used to integrate the analyses from the mixed methods.

Results: All pre-specified success criteria were achieved in terms of feasibility (recruitment, follow-up and iPOPP intervention adherence) and acceptability. Triangulation of the data identified the need, in the future, to make the iPOPP training (for intervention deliverers) more patient-centred to better support already active patients and the use of individualised goal setting and improve accelerometry data collection processes to increase the amount of valid data.

Conclusions: This pilot trial suggests that the iPOPP intervention and a future full-scale RCT are both acceptable and feasible. The use of a triangulation protocol enabled more robust conclusions about acceptability and feasibility to be drawn.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开展随机对照试验以测试在初级保健中对患有顽固性肌肉骨骼疼痛的老年人进行步行干预的有效性的可接受性和可行性:对 iPOPP 试点试验的混合方法评估。
导言:持续性肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛与老年人缺乏运动有关。虽然步行是一种可接受的体育锻炼方式,但步行干预措施在这一人群中的有效性仍有待确定:目的:评估开展随机对照试验(RCT)的可接受性和可行性,以测试在初级保健中由医护人员主导的针对患有持续性 MSK 疼痛的老年人的步行干预(iPOPP)的有效性:方法:在四家全科诊所开展了一项混合方法、三臂试验性 RCT,招募年龄≥65 岁、患有持续性 MSK 疼痛的患者。参与者按1:1:1的比例随机分配:(i) 常规护理;(ii) 常规护理加计步器干预;或 (iii) 常规护理加 iPOPP 步行干预。在对定量数据进行探索性分析时使用了描述性统计。定性数据采用主题分析法进行分析。采用三角测量协议对混合方法的分析结果进行整合:在可行性(招募、随访和坚持 iPOPP 干预)和可接受性方面,达到了所有预先指定的成功标准。对数据进行三角测量后发现,今后有必要使 iPOPP 培训(针对干预实施者)更加以患者为中心,以更好地支持已经很活跃的患者,并使用个性化目标设定和改进加速度计数据收集流程,以增加有效数据量:这项试点试验表明,iPOPP 干预方案和未来的全面 RCT 是可以接受的,也是可行的。三角测量方案的使用使我们能够就可接受性和可行性得出更可靠的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Improving Musculoskeletal Health by Incorporating Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Approaches Into Research Practices. Patients' Experiences, Satisfaction and Quality of Life With Physiotherapy Follow-Up After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study Protocol. Physical Activity, Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing, Body Awareness, Depression and Disease Activity in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Explorative Study. Physiotherapists' Treatment Strategies and Delineation of Areas of Responsibility for People With Musculoskeletal Conditions and Comorbidities in Private Physiotherapy Practice: A Qualitative Study. The Effect of Telerehabilitation-Based Self-Management Programme on Individuals With Scleroderma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1