Comparative Perspectives on Diagnostic Error Discussions Between Inpatient and Outpatient Pediatric Providers.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Medical Quality Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000148
Meagan M Ladell, Grant Shafer, Sonja I Ziniel, Joseph A Grubenhoff
{"title":"Comparative Perspectives on Diagnostic Error Discussions Between Inpatient and Outpatient Pediatric Providers.","authors":"Meagan M Ladell, Grant Shafer, Sonja I Ziniel, Joseph A Grubenhoff","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic error remains understudied and underaddressed despite causing significant morbidity and mortality. One barrier to addressing this issue remains provider discomfort. Survey studies have shown significantly more discomfort among providers in discussing diagnostic error compared with other forms of error. Whether the comfort in discussing diagnostic error differs depending on practice setting has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to assess differences in provider willingness to discuss diagnostic error in the inpatient versus outpatient setting. A multicenter survey was sent out to 3881 providers between May and June 2018. This survey was designed to assess comfort level of discussing diagnostic error and looking at barriers to discussing diagnostic error. Forty-three percent versus 22% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.004) were comfortable discussing short-term diagnostic error publicly. Similarly, 76% versus 60% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.010) were comfortable discussing short-term diagnostic error privately. A higher percentage of inpatient (64%) compared with outpatient providers (46%) (P = 0.043) were comfortable discussing long-term diagnostic error privately. Forty percent versus 24% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.018) were comfortable discussing long-term error publicly. No difference in barriers cited depending on practice setting. Inpatient providers are more comfortable discussing diagnostic error than their outpatient counterparts. More study is needed to determine the etiology of this discrepancy and to develop strategies to increase outpatient provider comfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":7539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Quality","volume":"38 5","pages":"245-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/d9/jmq-38-245.PMC10484186.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic error remains understudied and underaddressed despite causing significant morbidity and mortality. One barrier to addressing this issue remains provider discomfort. Survey studies have shown significantly more discomfort among providers in discussing diagnostic error compared with other forms of error. Whether the comfort in discussing diagnostic error differs depending on practice setting has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to assess differences in provider willingness to discuss diagnostic error in the inpatient versus outpatient setting. A multicenter survey was sent out to 3881 providers between May and June 2018. This survey was designed to assess comfort level of discussing diagnostic error and looking at barriers to discussing diagnostic error. Forty-three percent versus 22% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.004) were comfortable discussing short-term diagnostic error publicly. Similarly, 76% versus 60% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.010) were comfortable discussing short-term diagnostic error privately. A higher percentage of inpatient (64%) compared with outpatient providers (46%) (P = 0.043) were comfortable discussing long-term diagnostic error privately. Forty percent versus 24% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.018) were comfortable discussing long-term error publicly. No difference in barriers cited depending on practice setting. Inpatient providers are more comfortable discussing diagnostic error than their outpatient counterparts. More study is needed to determine the etiology of this discrepancy and to develop strategies to increase outpatient provider comfort.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院和门诊儿科提供者之间诊断错误讨论的比较视角。
尽管诊断错误造成了严重的发病率和死亡率,但其研究和处理仍然不足。解决这一问题的一个障碍仍然是供应商的不适。调查研究表明,与其他形式的错误相比,提供者在讨论诊断错误时明显更不舒服。讨论诊断错误的舒适度是否因实践环境而异,以前尚未进行过研究。本研究的目的是评估提供者在住院和门诊环境中讨论诊断错误的意愿的差异。2018年5月至6月期间,向3881家供应商进行了一项多中心调查。这项调查旨在评估讨论诊断错误的舒适度,并探讨讨论诊断错误时的障碍。43%的住院患者和22%的门诊患者(P=0.004)对公开讨论短期诊断错误感到满意。同样,76%的住院患者和60%的门诊患者(P=0.010)对私下讨论短期诊断错误感到满意。与门诊服务提供者(46%)(P=0.043)相比,住院患者(64%)更愿意私下讨论长期诊断错误。40%的住院患者和24%的门诊患者(P=0.018)对公开讨论长期错误感到满意。所引用的障碍因实践环境而异。住院医生比门诊医生更愿意讨论诊断错误。需要更多的研究来确定这种差异的病因,并制定策略来增加门诊服务提供者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Quality (AJMQ) is focused on keeping readers informed of the resources, processes, and perspectives contributing to quality health care services. This peer-reviewed journal presents a forum for the exchange of ideas, strategies, and methods in improving the delivery and management of health care.
期刊最新文献
Standardized Management of Sickle Cell Disease Patients and the Effects on Care Utilization and Costs Primary Care Provider and Staff Wellness and Burnout Levels and Suggestions to Improve Wellness: Analysis of Survey Findings Preparation of Patients for Central Venous Catheter Care in the Home: Perspectives From Health Care Personnel Handoff Education Interventions: A Scoping Review Focused on Sustaining Improvements A Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS) Clinic in Rural New England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1