Corticomotor excitability is altered in central neuropathic pain compared with non-neuropathic pain or pain-free patients

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102845
Luciana Mendonça Barbosa , Fernanda Valerio , Valquíria Aparecida da Silva , Antônia Lilian de Lima Rodrigues , Ricardo Galhardoni , Lin Tchia Yeng , Jefferson Rosi Junior , Adriana Bastos Conforto , Leandro Tavares Lucato , Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira , Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
{"title":"Corticomotor excitability is altered in central neuropathic pain compared with non-neuropathic pain or pain-free patients","authors":"Luciana Mendonça Barbosa ,&nbsp;Fernanda Valerio ,&nbsp;Valquíria Aparecida da Silva ,&nbsp;Antônia Lilian de Lima Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Ricardo Galhardoni ,&nbsp;Lin Tchia Yeng ,&nbsp;Jefferson Rosi Junior ,&nbsp;Adriana Bastos Conforto ,&nbsp;Leandro Tavares Lucato ,&nbsp;Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira ,&nbsp;Daniel Ciampi de Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Central neuropathic pain (CNP) is associated with altered corticomotor excitability (CE), which can potentially provide insights into its mechanisms. The objective of this study is to describe the CE changes that are specifically related to CNP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated CNP associated with brain injury after stroke or spinal cord injury (SCI) due to neuromyelitis optica through a battery of CE measurements and comprehensive pain, neurological, functional, and quality of life assessments. CNP was compared to two groups of patients with the same disease: i. with non-neuropathic pain and ii. without chronic pain, matched by sex and lesion location.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 163 patients (stroke=93; SCI=70: 74 had CNP, 43 had non-neuropathic pain, and 46 were pain-free). Stroke patients with CNP had lower motor evoked potential (MEP) in both affected and unaffected hemispheres compared to non- neuropathic pain and no-pain patients. Patients with CNP had lower amplitudes of MEPs (366 μV ±464 μV) than non-neuropathic (478 ±489) and no-pain (765 μV ± 880 μV) patients, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was defective (less inhibited) in patients with CNP (2.6±11.6) compared to no-pain (0.8±0.7), <em>p</em> = 0.021. MEPs negatively correlated with mechanical and cold-induced allodynia. Furthermore, classifying patients' results according to normative data revealed that at least 75% of patients had abnormalities in some CE parameters and confirmed MEP findings based on group analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>CNP is associated with decreased MEPs and SICI compared to non-neuropathic pain and no-pain patients. Corticomotor excitability changes may be helpful as neurophysiological markers of the development and persistence of pain after CNS injury, as they are likely to provide insights into global CE plasticity changes occurring after CNS lesions associated with CNP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"53 3","pages":"Article 102845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) is associated with altered corticomotor excitability (CE), which can potentially provide insights into its mechanisms. The objective of this study is to describe the CE changes that are specifically related to CNP.

Methods

We evaluated CNP associated with brain injury after stroke or spinal cord injury (SCI) due to neuromyelitis optica through a battery of CE measurements and comprehensive pain, neurological, functional, and quality of life assessments. CNP was compared to two groups of patients with the same disease: i. with non-neuropathic pain and ii. without chronic pain, matched by sex and lesion location.

Results

We included 163 patients (stroke=93; SCI=70: 74 had CNP, 43 had non-neuropathic pain, and 46 were pain-free). Stroke patients with CNP had lower motor evoked potential (MEP) in both affected and unaffected hemispheres compared to non- neuropathic pain and no-pain patients. Patients with CNP had lower amplitudes of MEPs (366 μV ±464 μV) than non-neuropathic (478 ±489) and no-pain (765 μV ± 880 μV) patients, p < 0.001. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was defective (less inhibited) in patients with CNP (2.6±11.6) compared to no-pain (0.8±0.7), p = 0.021. MEPs negatively correlated with mechanical and cold-induced allodynia. Furthermore, classifying patients' results according to normative data revealed that at least 75% of patients had abnormalities in some CE parameters and confirmed MEP findings based on group analyses.

Discussion

CNP is associated with decreased MEPs and SICI compared to non-neuropathic pain and no-pain patients. Corticomotor excitability changes may be helpful as neurophysiological markers of the development and persistence of pain after CNS injury, as they are likely to provide insights into global CE plasticity changes occurring after CNS lesions associated with CNP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与非神经性疼痛或无痛患者相比,中枢神经性疼痛患者的皮质类固醇兴奋性发生改变
目的中枢神经性疼痛(CNP)与皮质运动兴奋性(CE)的改变有关,这可能为深入了解其机制提供依据。本研究的目的是描述与CNP特异性相关的CE变化。方法我们通过一系列CE测量和综合疼痛、神经、功能和生活质量评估,评估了中风或视神经脊髓炎所致脊髓损伤(SCI)后与脑损伤相关的CNP。将CNP与患有相同疾病的两组患者进行比较:i.非神经性疼痛和ii。无慢性疼痛,与性别和病变部位相匹配。结果纳入163例患者(脑卒中=93例;脊髓损伤=70:74例有CNP,43例有非神经性疼痛,46例无疼痛)。与非神经性疼痛和无疼痛患者相比,患有CNP的中风患者受影响和未受影响的大脑半球的运动诱发电位(MEP)较低。CNP患者的MEP振幅(366μV±464μV)低于非神经性患者(478±489)和无疼痛患者(765±880μV);与无疼痛(0.8±0.7)相比,CNP患者的短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)有缺陷(抑制较少),p=0.021。MEP与机械性和冷诱导的异常性疼痛呈负相关。此外,根据规范性数据对患者的结果进行分类显示,至少75%的患者在某些CE参数方面存在异常,并根据组分析证实了MEP结果。讨论与非神经性疼痛和无疼痛患者相比,CNP与MEP和SICI降低有关。皮质激素兴奋性变化可能有助于作为中枢神经系统损伤后疼痛发展和持续的神经生理学标志,因为它们可能为与CNP相关的中枢神经系统病变后发生的整体CE可塑性变化提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1