Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Any time is a good time.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.22-127
Hamza Wani, Sadananda Meher, Uppalapati Srinivasulu, Laxmi Narayanan Mohanty, Madhusudan Modi, Mohammad Ibrarullah
{"title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Any time is a good time.","authors":"Hamza Wani,&nbsp;Sadananda Meher,&nbsp;Uppalapati Srinivasulu,&nbsp;Laxmi Narayanan Mohanty,&nbsp;Madhusudan Modi,&nbsp;Mohammad Ibrarullah","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.22-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within one week of acute cholecystitis is considered safe and advantageous. Surgery beyond first week is reserved for non-resolving attack or complications. To compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the first week and between two to six weeks of an attack of acute cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an analysis of a prospectively maintained database, all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were divided into two groups: group A, operated within one week; and group B, operated between two to six weeks of an attack. Main variables studied were mean operative time, conversion to open cholecystectomy, morbidity profile, and duration of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 patients (74 in group A and 42 in group B) were included. Mean interval between onset of symptoms & surgery was five days (range, 1-7 days) in group A and 12 days (range, 8-20 days) in group B. Operative time and incidence of subtotal cholecystectomy were higher in group B (statistically not significant). Mean postoperative stay was 2 days in group A and 3 days in group B. Laparoscopy was converted to open cholecystectomy in two patients in each group. There was no incidence of biliary injury. One patient in group B died during the postoperative period due to continued sepsis and multiorgan failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In tertiary care setting, with adequate surgical expertise, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in patients with acute cholecystitis irrespective of the time of presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"27 3","pages":"271-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/38/ahbps-27-3-271.PMC10472128.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within one week of acute cholecystitis is considered safe and advantageous. Surgery beyond first week is reserved for non-resolving attack or complications. To compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the first week and between two to six weeks of an attack of acute cholecystitis.

Methods: In an analysis of a prospectively maintained database, all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were divided into two groups: group A, operated within one week; and group B, operated between two to six weeks of an attack. Main variables studied were mean operative time, conversion to open cholecystectomy, morbidity profile, and duration of hospital stay.

Results: A total of 116 patients (74 in group A and 42 in group B) were included. Mean interval between onset of symptoms & surgery was five days (range, 1-7 days) in group A and 12 days (range, 8-20 days) in group B. Operative time and incidence of subtotal cholecystectomy were higher in group B (statistically not significant). Mean postoperative stay was 2 days in group A and 3 days in group B. Laparoscopy was converted to open cholecystectomy in two patients in each group. There was no incidence of biliary injury. One patient in group B died during the postoperative period due to continued sepsis and multiorgan failure.

Conclusions: In tertiary care setting, with adequate surgical expertise, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in patients with acute cholecystitis irrespective of the time of presentation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:任何时候都是好时机。
背景/目的:急性胆囊炎一周内腹腔镜胆囊切除术被认为是安全、有利的。第一周以后的手术保留给无法解决的发作或并发症。比较急性胆囊炎发作第一周和2 ~ 6周行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床结果。方法:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行分析,将所有急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者分为两组:a组,1周内手术;B组,每次发作两到六周。研究的主要变量为平均手术时间、转开腹胆囊切除术、发病率和住院时间。结果:共纳入116例患者,其中A组74例,B组42例。A组出现症状至手术的平均间隔时间为5天(范围1 ~ 7天),B组为12天(范围8 ~ 20天)。B组手术时间和胆囊次全切除术发生率高于B组(差异无统计学意义)。A组术后平均住院时间为2天,b组术后平均住院时间为3天。每组2例患者由腹腔镜转为开腹胆囊切除术。无胆道损伤发生。B组1例患者术后因持续脓毒症和多器官功能衰竭死亡。结论:在三级医疗机构,有足够的外科专业知识,腹腔镜胆囊切除术可以安全地用于急性胆囊炎患者,无论何时出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes of single-incision cholecystectomy: Propensity score matching of robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP system and da Vinci Xi system vs. laparoscopic surgery. Irreversible electroporation as an intraoperative adjunctive treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: An initial clinical experience. Feasibility of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to predict biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation: A pilot study. Heterotopic pancreas of the gallbladder: A case report of a rare and commonly incidental finding. Propensity score analysis of adjuvant therapy in radically resected gallbladder cancers: a real world experience from a regional cancer center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1