Scoring tools to identify TB patients facing catastrophic costs in the Philippines.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Public Health Action Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.5588/pha.23.0014
T Yamanaka, A M C Garfin, D M G Gaviola, R M Arao, F Morishita, T Hiatt, N Nishikiori, R P Yadav
{"title":"Scoring tools to identify TB patients facing catastrophic costs in the Philippines.","authors":"T Yamanaka,&nbsp;A M C Garfin,&nbsp;D M G Gaviola,&nbsp;R M Arao,&nbsp;F Morishita,&nbsp;T Hiatt,&nbsp;N Nishikiori,&nbsp;R P Yadav","doi":"10.5588/pha.23.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to meet a practical need to design a simple tool to identify TB patients who may potentially be facing catastrophic costs while seeking TB care in the public sector. Such a tool may help prevent and address catastrophic costs among individual patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the national TB patient cost survey in the Philippines. We randomly allocated TB patients to either the derivation or validation sample. Using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and β coefficients of logistic regression, we developed four scoring systems to identify TB patients who may be facing catastrophic costs from the derivation sample. We validated each scoring system in the validation sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 12 factors as predictive indicators associated with catastrophic costs. Using all 12 factors, the β coefficients-based scoring system (area under the curve [AUC] 0.783, 95% CI 0.754-0.812) had a high validity. Even with seven selected factors with OR > 2.0, the validity remained in the acceptable range (β coefficients-based: AUC 0.767, 95% CI 0.737-0.798).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The β coefficients-based scoring systems in this analysis can be used to identify those at high risk of facing catastrophic costs due to TB in the Philippines. Operational feasibility needs to be investigated further to implement this in routine TB surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":"13 2","pages":"53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.23.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was to meet a practical need to design a simple tool to identify TB patients who may potentially be facing catastrophic costs while seeking TB care in the public sector. Such a tool may help prevent and address catastrophic costs among individual patients.

Methods: We used data from the national TB patient cost survey in the Philippines. We randomly allocated TB patients to either the derivation or validation sample. Using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and β coefficients of logistic regression, we developed four scoring systems to identify TB patients who may be facing catastrophic costs from the derivation sample. We validated each scoring system in the validation sample.

Results: We identified a total of 12 factors as predictive indicators associated with catastrophic costs. Using all 12 factors, the β coefficients-based scoring system (area under the curve [AUC] 0.783, 95% CI 0.754-0.812) had a high validity. Even with seven selected factors with OR > 2.0, the validity remained in the acceptable range (β coefficients-based: AUC 0.767, 95% CI 0.737-0.798).

Conclusion: The β coefficients-based scoring systems in this analysis can be used to identify those at high risk of facing catastrophic costs due to TB in the Philippines. Operational feasibility needs to be investigated further to implement this in routine TB surveillance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾用于识别面临灾难性费用的结核病患者的评分工具。
背景:本研究旨在满足设计一种简单工具的实际需要,以识别在公共部门寻求结核病治疗时可能面临灾难性费用的结核病患者。这种工具可能有助于预防和解决个别患者的灾难性成本。方法:我们使用来自菲律宾国家结核病患者成本调查的数据。我们将结核病患者随机分配到衍生样本或验证样本中。利用调整后的优势比(ORs)和logistic回归的β系数,我们开发了四种评分系统来识别可能面临灾难性成本的衍生样本中的结核病患者。我们验证了验证样本中的每个评分系统。结果:我们共确定了12个因素作为与灾难性成本相关的预测指标。在所有12个因素中,基于β系数的评分系统(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.783, 95% CI 0.754-0.812)具有较高的效度。即使选择了7个OR > 2.0的因素,效度仍在可接受范围内(基于β系数:AUC 0.767, 95% CI 0.737-0.798)。结论:本分析中基于β系数的评分系统可用于识别菲律宾因结核病面临灾难性成本的高风险人群。需要进一步调查在常规结核病监测中实施这一方法的操作可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Action
Public Health Action RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.
期刊最新文献
TB burden and diagnostic challenges at Sandaun Provincial Hospital in West Sepik Province of PNG, 2016-2021. TB-related technical enquiries received at the Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan, during COVID-19. Continuous quality improvement in a community-wide TB screening and prevention programme in Papua New Guinea. Effects of extrapulmonary TB on patient quality of life and recurrence. Impact of Truenat on TB diagnosis in Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1