Disparities in Cancer Screening in Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: A Secondary Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Oncology nursing forum Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1188/23.ONF.157-167
Kelly Haviland, Martina Mueller, Chasity B Walters, Teresa J Kelechi
{"title":"Disparities in Cancer Screening in Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: A Secondary Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data.","authors":"Kelly Haviland, Martina Mueller, Chasity B Walters, Teresa J Kelechi","doi":"10.1188/23.ONF.157-167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe cancer screening characteristics and better understand individual-, environmental-, and organizational-level barriers of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations.&nbsp.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>This study was conducted using a combined sample from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national dataset from 2014 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Chi-square tests for independence and logistic regression analysis tests were performed to determine whether relationships existed between SGM status and demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black respondents or those who reported their race as other, were female, had some college or technical school or more, and had healthcare coverage were less likely to present for cancer screening. SGM respondents who were in good or better health; were unmarried; were aged 18-44 years or 45-55 years; or were Asian, Native American, or Hawaiian, or reported their race as other, had higher odds of screening for cancer.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Disparities in cancer screening among SGM populations are not well documented. These findings will inform structured education and preventative interventions to improve screening participation among SGM populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"50 2","pages":"157-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.157-167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe cancer screening characteristics and better understand individual-, environmental-, and organizational-level barriers of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. .

Sample & setting: This study was conducted using a combined sample from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national dataset from 2014 and 2016.

Methods & variables: Chi-square tests for independence and logistic regression analysis tests were performed to determine whether relationships existed between SGM status and demographics.

Results: Black respondents or those who reported their race as other, were female, had some college or technical school or more, and had healthcare coverage were less likely to present for cancer screening. SGM respondents who were in good or better health; were unmarried; were aged 18-44 years or 45-55 years; or were Asian, Native American, or Hawaiian, or reported their race as other, had higher odds of screening for cancer.

Implications for nursing: Disparities in cancer screening among SGM populations are not well documented. These findings will inform structured education and preventative interventions to improve screening participation among SGM populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性和性别少数群体癌症筛查的差异:行为危险因素监测系统数据的二次分析。
目的:描述癌症筛查特征,更好地了解性和性别少数群体(SGM)的个体、环境和组织层面的障碍 。样本和设置:本研究使用2014年至2016年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)国家数据集的组合样本进行。方法和变量:进行独立性卡方检验和逻辑回归分析检验,以确定SGM状态与人口统计学之间是否存在关系。结果:黑人受访者或其他种族的受访者,女性,有大学或技术学校或以上学历,有医疗保险,不太可能参加癌症筛查。健康状况良好或更好的SGM受访者;未婚;年龄18-44岁或45-55岁;或者是亚洲人、美洲原住民或夏威夷人,或者报告他们的种族是其他人,他们筛查癌症的几率更高。对护理的影响:SGM人群中癌症筛查的差异没有得到很好的记录。这些发现将为结构化教育和预防干预提供信息,以提高SGM人群的筛查参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Surveillance Mammography Adherence in Korean Breast Cancer Survivors. Build Bridges, Not Walls: A Call for Collaboration in Oncology With PhD and DNP Colleagues to Improve Research. Expectancy Effect of Acupuncture on Cancer-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Exploring Caregiver Burden and Related Factors Among Primary Caregivers of Patients With Cancer in Taiwan. Feasibility Study of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Treatment-Related Sequelae, and Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1