Clinician Perception of Risk As a Barrier to Implementation of a High-sensitivity Troponin Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol.

Andrew J Matuskowitz, John P Hall, Mathew J Gregoski, Steven H Saef
{"title":"Clinician Perception of Risk As a Barrier to Implementation of a High-sensitivity Troponin Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol.","authors":"Andrew J Matuskowitz,&nbsp;John P Hall,&nbsp;Mathew J Gregoski,&nbsp;Steven H Saef","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess emergency department (ED) clinician perception of patient risk, we measured willingness to discharge patients categorized as increased risk by traditional risk stratification modalities for acute coronary syndrome but low risk by a validated high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol (HST-ADP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study distributed to ED clinicians at an urban academic medical center. Four clinical vignettes classified hypothetical patients as low risk for 30-day acute coronary syndrome according to the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Vignettes additionally identified patients with History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and initial Troponin (HEART) scores of 4 or 6 (2 cases each). One patient in each subset had preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). ED clinicians self-reported willingness to discharge patients from the ED on a 10-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 66 eligible participants, 36 (55%) participated in the survey. ED clinicians reported a mean willingness to discharge patients of 6.07 (95% confidence interval, 5.34-6.80). They reported higher mean willingness to discharge patients with HEART scores of 4 compared with those with HEART scores of 6 (mean difference, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-5.03). There were no differences in willingness to discharge regarding presence or absence of CAD or between clinician types (attending, resident, advanced practice provider).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED clinicians accustomed to the HEART Pathway demonstrated limited willingness to discharge patients from the ED categorized as moderate risk by the HEART score despite simultaneous classification as low risk by the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Willingness to discharge was higher with lower HEART scores but not affected by the presence of CAD and did not vary between clinician types.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309064/pdf/nihms-1905710.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess emergency department (ED) clinician perception of patient risk, we measured willingness to discharge patients categorized as increased risk by traditional risk stratification modalities for acute coronary syndrome but low risk by a validated high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol (HST-ADP).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study distributed to ED clinicians at an urban academic medical center. Four clinical vignettes classified hypothetical patients as low risk for 30-day acute coronary syndrome according to the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Vignettes additionally identified patients with History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and initial Troponin (HEART) scores of 4 or 6 (2 cases each). One patient in each subset had preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). ED clinicians self-reported willingness to discharge patients from the ED on a 10-point Likert scale.

Results: Among 66 eligible participants, 36 (55%) participated in the survey. ED clinicians reported a mean willingness to discharge patients of 6.07 (95% confidence interval, 5.34-6.80). They reported higher mean willingness to discharge patients with HEART scores of 4 compared with those with HEART scores of 6 (mean difference, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-5.03). There were no differences in willingness to discharge regarding presence or absence of CAD or between clinician types (attending, resident, advanced practice provider).

Conclusions: ED clinicians accustomed to the HEART Pathway demonstrated limited willingness to discharge patients from the ED categorized as moderate risk by the HEART score despite simultaneous classification as low risk by the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Willingness to discharge was higher with lower HEART scores but not affected by the presence of CAD and did not vary between clinician types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生对风险的认知是实施高灵敏度肌钙蛋白加速诊断方案的障碍。
背景:为了评估急诊科(ED)临床医生对患者风险的认知,我们测量了急性冠状动脉综合征患者的出院意愿,这些患者被传统的风险分层模式分类为风险增加,但经验证的高灵敏度肌钙蛋白加速诊断方案(HST-ADP)分类为低风险。方法:这是一项横断面描述性调查研究,分布在城市学术医疗中心的急诊科临床医生中。四项临床试验根据0 /1小时HST-ADP将假设患者分为30天急性冠脉综合征低风险。小插曲还确定了病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和初始肌钙蛋白(HEART)评分为4或6的患者(各2例)。每个亚组中有1例患者先前存在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。急诊科医生以10分李克特量表自我报告病人出院意愿。结果:在66名符合条件的参与者中,36名(55%)参与了调查。ED临床医生报告的平均出院意愿为6.07(95%可信区间为5.34-6.80)。他们报告说,与HEART评分为6分的患者相比,HEART评分为4分的患者平均出院意愿更高(平均差异为3.61;95%置信区间,2.19-5.03)。出院意愿与是否存在CAD无关,也与临床医生类型(主治医生、住院医生、高级执业医师)无关。结论:习惯HEART途径的ED临床医生表现出有限的意愿,将患者从HEART评分中分类为中度风险的ED中出院,尽管同时被0 /1小时HST-ADP分类为低风险。心脏评分越低,出院意愿越高,但不受CAD存在的影响,并且在临床医生类型之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Altered anthropometrics and HA1c levels, but not dyslipidemia, are associated with elevated hs-CRP levels in middle-aged adults: A population-based analysis. Role of Embolic Protection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention without Saphenous Venous graft lesions in ST-elevation myocardial infarction - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia in the United States. Emergency Department and Critical Care Use of Clevidipine for Treatment of Hypertension in Patients with Acute Stroke. Impact of as Needed Heparin Boluses on Supratherapeutic Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Patients Managed With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1