Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury in Indian Classical Dancers: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical problems of performing artists Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.21091/mppa.2023.3020
Akilesh Anand Prakash, D Subaskaran, Vinitha Akilesh
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury in Indian Classical Dancers: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Akilesh Anand Prakash,&nbsp;D Subaskaran,&nbsp;Vinitha Akilesh","doi":"10.21091/mppa.2023.3020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of current research on dance injuries has been on ballet, leaving a void in recent data on musculoskeletal injuries in Indian classical [IC] dance. The prevalence of injuries among IC dancers remains unclear, stressing the importance of injury epidemiology research for improved diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and injury burden reduction. Through a thorough examination of published literature, this study sought to critically evaluate existing research on the epidemiology of musculoskeletal pain and injury in IC dancers. Using Google Scholar and PubMed, a systematic evaluation of the online literature published in English was carried out from inception up to December 31, 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. For studies estimating injury prevalence, the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool and the Risk of Bias Tool (RoBT) were used to evaluate the studies' quality. Of 3,917 studies identified, 6 studies, all cross-sectional, of low quality, with a high risk of bias, and featuring young Bharatanatyam and Kathak dancers, were determined to be admissible. Because of the studies' heterogeneity, severe study limitations, and methodological variability, a meta-analysis could not be carried out. The evidence from the current review is severely constrained, lacking generalizability to IC dancers as a whole and Bharatanatyam in particular. Since injury epidemiology is essential to the whole injury-prevention puzzle, there is a need for standardization in future research, particularly with active and prospective injury surveillance, injury assessment, and injury reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":18336,"journal":{"name":"Medical problems of performing artists","volume":"38 3","pages":"164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical problems of performing artists","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2023.3020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of current research on dance injuries has been on ballet, leaving a void in recent data on musculoskeletal injuries in Indian classical [IC] dance. The prevalence of injuries among IC dancers remains unclear, stressing the importance of injury epidemiology research for improved diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and injury burden reduction. Through a thorough examination of published literature, this study sought to critically evaluate existing research on the epidemiology of musculoskeletal pain and injury in IC dancers. Using Google Scholar and PubMed, a systematic evaluation of the online literature published in English was carried out from inception up to December 31, 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. For studies estimating injury prevalence, the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool and the Risk of Bias Tool (RoBT) were used to evaluate the studies' quality. Of 3,917 studies identified, 6 studies, all cross-sectional, of low quality, with a high risk of bias, and featuring young Bharatanatyam and Kathak dancers, were determined to be admissible. Because of the studies' heterogeneity, severe study limitations, and methodological variability, a meta-analysis could not be carried out. The evidence from the current review is severely constrained, lacking generalizability to IC dancers as a whole and Bharatanatyam in particular. Since injury epidemiology is essential to the whole injury-prevention puzzle, there is a need for standardization in future research, particularly with active and prospective injury surveillance, injury assessment, and injury reporting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度古典舞者的肌肉骨骼疼痛和损伤:系统综述。
目前大多数关于舞蹈损伤的研究都是关于芭蕾的,而最近关于印度古典舞蹈肌肉骨骼损伤的数据却很空白。IC舞者中损伤的患病率尚不清楚,强调了损伤流行病学研究对改进诊断、治疗、预防和减轻损伤负担的重要性。通过对已发表文献的全面研究,本研究试图批判性地评估IC舞者肌肉骨骼疼痛和损伤的流行病学研究。根据PRISMA指南,使用Google Scholar和PubMed对从成立到2021年12月31日发表的英文在线文献进行了系统评估。对于估计伤害患病率的研究,使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所患病率关键评估工具和风险偏差工具(RoBT)来评估研究的质量。在确定的3917项研究中,有6项研究被确定为可接受的,这些研究都是横截面的,质量低,偏差风险高,并且以年轻的婆罗那塔扬和卡萨克舞者为特征。由于研究的异质性、严重的研究局限性和方法可变性,不能进行荟萃分析。目前审查的证据受到严重限制,缺乏对整个IC舞者的普遍性,特别是巴拉塔纳塔扬。由于损伤流行病学对整个损伤预防难题至关重要,因此在未来的研究中需要标准化,特别是在主动和前瞻性损伤监测、损伤评估和损伤报告方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Problems of Performing Artists is the first clinical medical journal devoted to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of medical and psychological disorders related to the performing arts. Original peer-reviewed research papers cover topics including neurologic disorders, musculoskeletal conditions, voice and hearing disorders, anxieties, stress, substance abuse, and other health issues related to actors, dancers, singers, musicians, and other performers.
期刊最新文献
Effects of E-learning for Postural Education in Music Students (El-Poems): A Randomized Controlled Trial Among Iranian Adolescents. Long-Term Effects of Three Different Exercise Training Modes on Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Female Flamenco Dancers. Relationship Between Sport Specialization and Quality of Life in Young Female Dancers. Successful Use of Orthodontic Aligners in a Young Brass Instrumentalist: A Case Report. Comparison of Perfectionism Between Music and Medical Students and its Association with Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1