Cognitive prescriptions for reducing dementia risk factors among Black/African Americans: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2023.2231669
Pariya L Fazeli, Cierra Hopkins, David E Vance, Virginia Wadley, Peng Li, Bulent Turan, Danny H Wang, Pamela G Bowen, Olivio J Clay
{"title":"Cognitive prescriptions for reducing dementia risk factors among Black/African Americans: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy.","authors":"Pariya L Fazeli, Cierra Hopkins, David E Vance, Virginia Wadley, Peng Li, Bulent Turan, Danny H Wang, Pamela G Bowen, Olivio J Clay","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2023.2231669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Black/African Americans (B/AAs) have double the risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia than Whites, which is largely driven by health behaviors. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a pilot randomized clinical trial of an individualized multidomain health behavior intervention among middle-aged and older B/AAs (dubbed Cognitive Prescriptions [CogRx]).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thirty-nine community-dwelling B/AA participants aged 45-65 without significant cognitive impairment were randomized to one of three groups: CogRx, Psychoeducation, or no-contact control. The Psychoeducation and CogRx groups received material on dementia prevalence, prognosis, and risk factors, while the CogRx group additionally received information on their risk factor profile across the five CogRx domains (physical, cognitive, and social activity, diet, sleep). This information was used for developing tailored 3-month goals in their suboptimal areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CogRx program had high retention (all 13 CogRx participants completed the 3-month program and 97% of the full sample completed at least 1 follow-up) and was well-received as exhibited by qualitative and quantitative feedback. Themes identified in the positive feedback provided by participants on the program included: increased knowledge, goal-setting, personalization, and motivation. The COVID-19 pandemic was a consistent theme that emerged regarding barriers of adherence to the program. All three groups improved on dementia knowledge, with the largest effects observed in CogRx and Psychoeducation groups. Increases in cognitive, physical, and overall leisure activities favored the CogRx group, whereas improvements in sleep outcomes favored Psychoeducation and CogRx groups as compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CogRx program demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in increasing dementia knowledge and targeted health behaviors. Further refinement and testing of the implementation and effectiveness of similar person-centered dementia prevention approaches are needed on a larger scale in diverse populations. Such findings may have implications for clinical and public health recommendations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03864536.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2023.2231669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Black/African Americans (B/AAs) have double the risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia than Whites, which is largely driven by health behaviors. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a pilot randomized clinical trial of an individualized multidomain health behavior intervention among middle-aged and older B/AAs (dubbed Cognitive Prescriptions [CogRx]).

Design: Thirty-nine community-dwelling B/AA participants aged 45-65 without significant cognitive impairment were randomized to one of three groups: CogRx, Psychoeducation, or no-contact control. The Psychoeducation and CogRx groups received material on dementia prevalence, prognosis, and risk factors, while the CogRx group additionally received information on their risk factor profile across the five CogRx domains (physical, cognitive, and social activity, diet, sleep). This information was used for developing tailored 3-month goals in their suboptimal areas.

Results: The CogRx program had high retention (all 13 CogRx participants completed the 3-month program and 97% of the full sample completed at least 1 follow-up) and was well-received as exhibited by qualitative and quantitative feedback. Themes identified in the positive feedback provided by participants on the program included: increased knowledge, goal-setting, personalization, and motivation. The COVID-19 pandemic was a consistent theme that emerged regarding barriers of adherence to the program. All three groups improved on dementia knowledge, with the largest effects observed in CogRx and Psychoeducation groups. Increases in cognitive, physical, and overall leisure activities favored the CogRx group, whereas improvements in sleep outcomes favored Psychoeducation and CogRx groups as compared to the control group.

Conclusion: The CogRx program demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in increasing dementia knowledge and targeted health behaviors. Further refinement and testing of the implementation and effectiveness of similar person-centered dementia prevention approaches are needed on a larger scale in diverse populations. Such findings may have implications for clinical and public health recommendations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03864536.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少黑人/非裔美国人痴呆症风险因素的认知处方:可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。
目标:美国黑人/非洲裔美国人(B/AAs)罹患阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症的风险是白人的两倍,而这主要是由健康行为造成的。本研究考察了在中老年黑人/非裔美国人中开展个性化多领域健康行为干预试点随机临床试验(称为认知处方 [CogRx])的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:设计:39 名居住在社区、年龄在 45-65 岁之间、无明显认知障碍的 B/AA 参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组:CogRx、心理教育或无接触对照组。心理教育组和 CogRx 组收到了有关痴呆症发病率、预后和风险因素的资料,而 CogRx 组则收到了有关他们在五个 CogRx 领域(身体、认知、社交活动、饮食、睡眠)的风险因素概况的额外信息。这些信息被用于针对他们的次优领域制定量身定制的 3 个月目标:结果:CogRx 计划的保留率很高(所有 13 名 CogRx 参与者都完成了为期 3 个月的计划,97% 的完整样本至少完成了一次随访),而且从定性和定量反馈来看,该计划广受欢迎。参与者对该计划的积极反馈中确定的主题包括:知识增长、目标设定、个性化和动力。而 COVID-19 大流行则是阻碍参与者参加该计划的一个一致的主题。所有三个小组都提高了对痴呆症的认识,其中 CogRx 小组和心理教育小组的效果最大。与对照组相比,CogRx 组在认知、体能和整体休闲活动方面更有优势,而心理教育组和 CogRx 组在睡眠方面更有优势:CogRx计划在增加痴呆症知识和目标健康行为方面具有可行性、可接受性和初步有效性。类似的以人为本的痴呆症预防方法的实施和有效性还需要在不同人群中进行更大规模的完善和测试。这些发现可能会对临床和公共卫生建议产生影响:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT03864536.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
期刊最新文献
'COVID impacted my life in so many ways': a qualitative study of the lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic among people of Black ethnicities living with HIV in England. A paradox of white privilege: race, psychological resilience, and mental well-being during a public health crisis. 'I didn't expect to be so close to being diabetic': beliefs of prediabetes and diabetes prevention among Hispanic men at a federally qualified health center. Psychological distress in Asian American informal caregivers: an analysis by disaggregated ethnic groups. Racial diversity, interracial trust, and mental distress in post-apartheid South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1