Carbon dioxide: A stronger driver of cardiac output than oxygen?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1111/aas.14310
Jacob Karlsson, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist
{"title":"Carbon dioxide: A stronger driver of cardiac output than oxygen?","authors":"Jacob Karlsson, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist","doi":"10.1111/aas.14310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, The regulation of breathing by the gases oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) has since long been established, showing that CO2, to a much larger extent than O2, governs the respiratory effort. However, the effect of the same gases in the regulation of cardiac output (CO) has received limited scientific interest. Due to the fundamental importance of oxygen for the well-being of the organism, it has become accepted that it is O2 that mainly governs CO. However, extra-corporeal circulation experiments in animals, which can tightly and individually alter the levels of O2 and CO2 in the blood, have shown that increasing CO2 results in a substantial increase in CO, whereas a reduction of O2 will need to be pronounced to trigger a later and more moderate increase in CO (please confer with regulation of respiration). Further, for logistic reasons, it seems quite unlikely that respiration and circulation would be controlled by two different gas parameters (CO2—respiration; O2—circulation) since this would create great difficulty in achieving optimal ventilation/perfusion matching in the lung, which is a prerequisite for optimal gas exchange. Therefore, it would be more logical if both respiration and circulation were controlled by the same gas, that is, CO2. If accepting the above, then removal of CO2 is the fundamental gaseous driver of circulation and the resulting increased O2 uptake is a passive secondary phenomenon to the increased need to excrete CO2. The aim of this communication was to re-evaluate our previous animal data to potentially find further data in support of CO2 being the main gaseous driver of circulation, in the context of normal circulation.","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1439-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, The regulation of breathing by the gases oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) has since long been established, showing that CO2, to a much larger extent than O2, governs the respiratory effort. However, the effect of the same gases in the regulation of cardiac output (CO) has received limited scientific interest. Due to the fundamental importance of oxygen for the well-being of the organism, it has become accepted that it is O2 that mainly governs CO. However, extra-corporeal circulation experiments in animals, which can tightly and individually alter the levels of O2 and CO2 in the blood, have shown that increasing CO2 results in a substantial increase in CO, whereas a reduction of O2 will need to be pronounced to trigger a later and more moderate increase in CO (please confer with regulation of respiration). Further, for logistic reasons, it seems quite unlikely that respiration and circulation would be controlled by two different gas parameters (CO2—respiration; O2—circulation) since this would create great difficulty in achieving optimal ventilation/perfusion matching in the lung, which is a prerequisite for optimal gas exchange. Therefore, it would be more logical if both respiration and circulation were controlled by the same gas, that is, CO2. If accepting the above, then removal of CO2 is the fundamental gaseous driver of circulation and the resulting increased O2 uptake is a passive secondary phenomenon to the increased need to excrete CO2. The aim of this communication was to re-evaluate our previous animal data to potentially find further data in support of CO2 being the main gaseous driver of circulation, in the context of normal circulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳:比氧气更能驱动心输出量?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial. Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review. Time from pain assessment to opioid treatment in the Danish emergency departments-A multicenter cohort study. Viscoelastic testing of fibrinolytic capacity in acutely infected critically ill patients: Protocol for a scoping review. Does cytochrome 2D6 genotype affect the analgesic efficacy of codeine after ambulatory surgery? Prospective trial in 987 adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1