Assessing the educational value and content of YouTube videos for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1177/11297298231187168
Tulin Satilmis, Betul Basaran
{"title":"Assessing the educational value and content of YouTube videos for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization.","authors":"Tulin Satilmis, Betul Basaran","doi":"10.1177/11297298231187168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a guideline regarding continuous ultrasound guidance for central venous catheters in 2020. YouTube has been a popular educational platform since its inception. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the adequacy of videos on ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization posted on YouTube based on this guideline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>YouTube was scanned using the keywords associated with ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization and 46 of the 106 most-watched videos were included in the study. The videos were divided into three groups, as individual, manufacturer, and academic according to their sources, and were evaluated as poor, satisfactory, and good in terms of the overall content. The videos were then evaluated based on ESA's six-title guide for more specific informational content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 videos were reviewed and 52.2% (<i>n</i> = 24) were found to be prepared by individuals. Among the videos, the rate of videos describing only venipuncture (poor) was 23.9% (<i>n</i> = 11), 73.9% (<i>n</i> = 34) of videos described the verification of the guidewire location with venipuncture, and 2.2% of videos described all the recommendations suggested by the guide (<i>n</i> = 1). At the end of the catheterization procedure, 4.3% (<i>n</i> = 2) stated that the catheter location should be confirmed by using ultrasound, 15.2% (<i>n</i> = 7) recommended chest-X-ray, and 80.4% (<i>n</i> = 37) did not suggest any.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Manufacturer and academic videos can be watched due to their high-quality scores, but it may be practical to prepare training videos with guidelines both for educators and students to have global access to the renewed guideline information.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1822-1827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231187168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a guideline regarding continuous ultrasound guidance for central venous catheters in 2020. YouTube has been a popular educational platform since its inception. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the adequacy of videos on ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization posted on YouTube based on this guideline.

Method: YouTube was scanned using the keywords associated with ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization and 46 of the 106 most-watched videos were included in the study. The videos were divided into three groups, as individual, manufacturer, and academic according to their sources, and were evaluated as poor, satisfactory, and good in terms of the overall content. The videos were then evaluated based on ESA's six-title guide for more specific informational content.

Results: A total of 46 videos were reviewed and 52.2% (n = 24) were found to be prepared by individuals. Among the videos, the rate of videos describing only venipuncture (poor) was 23.9% (n = 11), 73.9% (n = 34) of videos described the verification of the guidewire location with venipuncture, and 2.2% of videos described all the recommendations suggested by the guide (n = 1). At the end of the catheterization procedure, 4.3% (n = 2) stated that the catheter location should be confirmed by using ultrasound, 15.2% (n = 7) recommended chest-X-ray, and 80.4% (n = 37) did not suggest any.

Conclusion: Manufacturer and academic videos can be watched due to their high-quality scores, but it may be practical to prepare training videos with guidelines both for educators and students to have global access to the renewed guideline information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估YouTube视频对超声引导下锁骨下静脉导管插入术的教育价值和内容。
背景:欧洲麻醉学会(ESA)于 2020 年发布了关于中心静脉导管连续超声引导的指南。YouTube 自诞生以来一直是一个广受欢迎的教育平台。本研究旨在根据该指南评估 YouTube 上发布的超声引导锁骨下静脉导管插入术视频的适当性:方法:使用与超声引导下锁骨下静脉导管插入术相关的关键词对 YouTube 进行扫描,并将 106 个观看次数最多的视频中的 46 个纳入研究范围。根据视频的来源,这些视频被分为个人、制造商和学术三组,并在整体内容方面被评为差、满意和好。然后,根据 ESA 的六个标题指南对视频进行评估,以了解更具体的信息内容:共审查了 46 部视频,发现 52.2%(n = 24)的视频是由个人制作的。在这些视频中,仅描述静脉穿刺(差)的视频占 23.9%(n = 11),73.9%(n = 34)的视频描述了通过静脉穿刺验证导丝位置,2.2%的视频描述了指南提出的所有建议(n = 1)。在导管插入术结束时,4.3%(n = 2)的视频指出应使用超声波确认导管位置,15.2%(n = 7)的视频建议进行胸部 X 光检查,80.4%(n = 37)的视频未提出任何建议:结论:制造商和学术视频因其高质量的评分而可以被观看,但为教育工作者和学生准备带有指南的培训视频以全面获取更新的指南信息可能是切实可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Role of renal vascular coordinator on access flow dysfunction: A quality improvement initiative on improving patency rate. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy co-guided removal of extravascular stripped central line guidewire fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1