Public health agencies' use of social media for communication during pandemics: a scoping review of the literature.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0095
Babatunde Abiodun Balogun, Anne Hogden, Nenagh Kemp, Lin Yang, Maria Agaliotis
{"title":"Public health agencies' use of social media for communication during pandemics: a scoping review of the literature.","authors":"Babatunde Abiodun Balogun,&nbsp;Anne Hogden,&nbsp;Nenagh Kemp,&nbsp;Lin Yang,&nbsp;Maria Agaliotis","doi":"10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health agencies (PHAs) have increasingly incorporated social media into their communication mix during successive pandemics in the 21st century. However, the quality, timing, and accuracy of their health messages have varied significantly, resulting in mixed outcomes for communication, audience engagement, and pandemic management. This study aimed to identify factors influencing the effectiveness of pandemic-related health messages shared by PHAs on social media and to report their impact on public engagement as documented in the literature. A scoping literature review was conducted following a predefined protocol. An electronic search of 7 relevant databases and 5 grey literature repositories yielded 9,714 papers published between January 2003 and November 2022. Seventy-three papers were deemed eligible and selected for review. The results underscored the insufficiency of social media guidance policies for PHAs. Six themes were identified: message source, message topic, message style, message timing, content credibility and reliability, and message recipient profile. These themes encompassed 20 variables that could inform PHAs' social media public health communication during pandemics. Additionally, the findings revealed potential interconnectedness among the variables, and this study concluded by proposing a conceptual model that expands upon existing theoretical foundations for developing and evaluating pandemic-related health messaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":38949,"journal":{"name":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/e5/j-phrp-2023-0095.PMC10493704.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public health agencies (PHAs) have increasingly incorporated social media into their communication mix during successive pandemics in the 21st century. However, the quality, timing, and accuracy of their health messages have varied significantly, resulting in mixed outcomes for communication, audience engagement, and pandemic management. This study aimed to identify factors influencing the effectiveness of pandemic-related health messages shared by PHAs on social media and to report their impact on public engagement as documented in the literature. A scoping literature review was conducted following a predefined protocol. An electronic search of 7 relevant databases and 5 grey literature repositories yielded 9,714 papers published between January 2003 and November 2022. Seventy-three papers were deemed eligible and selected for review. The results underscored the insufficiency of social media guidance policies for PHAs. Six themes were identified: message source, message topic, message style, message timing, content credibility and reliability, and message recipient profile. These themes encompassed 20 variables that could inform PHAs' social media public health communication during pandemics. Additionally, the findings revealed potential interconnectedness among the variables, and this study concluded by proposing a conceptual model that expands upon existing theoretical foundations for developing and evaluating pandemic-related health messaging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共卫生机构在流行病期间使用社交媒体进行沟通:对文献的范围审查。
在21世纪的连续大流行期间,公共卫生机构越来越多地将社交媒体纳入其通信组合。然而,他们健康信息的质量、时间和准确性差异很大,导致沟通、受众参与和大流行管理方面的结果好坏参半。本研究旨在确定影响pha在社交媒体上分享的与大流行相关的健康信息有效性的因素,并报告文献中记录的它们对公众参与的影响。根据预先确定的方案进行范围文献综述。通过对7个相关数据库和5个灰色文献库的电子检索,获得了2003年1月至2022年11月期间发表的9714篇论文。73篇论文被认为符合条件并被选中进行审查。研究结果强调了pha社会媒体指导政策的不足。确定了六个主题:消息来源、消息主题、消息样式、消息定时、内容可信度和可靠性以及消息接收者配置文件。这些主题包含20个变量,可为pha在大流行期间的社交媒体公共卫生传播提供信息。此外,研究结果揭示了变量之间潜在的相互联系,本研究最后提出了一个概念模型,该模型扩展了开发和评估与大流行有关的卫生信息的现有理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Associations of type and intensity of social participation with depression, self-rated health, and life satisfaction among community-dwelling older adults in the Republic of Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Individual and contextual factors associated with measles infection in Malaysia: a multilevel analysis. Rural-urban differences in common mental disorders among Indonesian youth: a cross-sectional national survey. Methodology of comparative studies on the relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review. BCED-Net: Breast Cancer Ensemble Diagnosis Network using transfer learning and the XGBoost classifier with mammography images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1