Measuring quality of vision including negative dysphotopsia

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1111/aos.15762
Natalia Y. Makhotkina, Marjan D. Nijkamp, Tos T. J. M. Berendschot, Bart van den Borne, Moniek Aelen-van Kruchten, Luc van Vught, Jan-Willem M. Beenakker, Edwin Krijgh, Tariq Aslam, Konrad Pesudovs, Rudy M. M. A. Nuijts
{"title":"Measuring quality of vision including negative dysphotopsia","authors":"Natalia Y. Makhotkina,&nbsp;Marjan D. Nijkamp,&nbsp;Tos T. J. M. Berendschot,&nbsp;Bart van den Borne,&nbsp;Moniek Aelen-van Kruchten,&nbsp;Luc van Vught,&nbsp;Jan-Willem M. Beenakker,&nbsp;Edwin Krijgh,&nbsp;Tariq Aslam,&nbsp;Konrad Pesudovs,&nbsp;Rudy M. M. A. Nuijts","doi":"10.1111/aos.15762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To adapt the Quality of Vision Questionnaire (QoV) for measuring negative dysphotopsia and to validate the original and modified versions in the Dutch population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The QoV was translated into Dutch according to standardized methodology. Negative dysphotopsia items were constructed based on focus group interviews, literature review and clinical data. The questionnaire was completed by 404 subjects, including contact lens wearers, patients with cataract and after cataract surgery (95.5% with a monofocal, 4.5% with a multifocal intraocular lens). Rasch analysis was applied for evaluation of reliability and validity of the original QoV and modified version, Negative Dysphotopsia QoV (ND-QoV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The frequency, severity and bothersome scales of the QoV and ND-QoV demonstrated good measurement precision, good fit statistics for all but one item, but significant mistargeting of more than one logit. Item estimations were stable across the study groups and scales were unidimensional with more than 50% of variance explained by the measurements. There was a positive correlation between questionnaire scores and best corrected visual acuity (<i>r</i> = 0.3, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The quality of vision measured by all three scales was significantly poorer (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) in patients with negative dysphotopsia compared to asymptomatic pseudophakic patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The Dutch version of the QoV questionnaire has shown good psychometric properties comparable to the native version as well as good reliability and validity. The addition of negative dysphotopsia items is a valuable modification for the reliable assessment of quality of vision in pseudophakic patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"102 4","pages":"e510-e519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aos.15762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.15762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To adapt the Quality of Vision Questionnaire (QoV) for measuring negative dysphotopsia and to validate the original and modified versions in the Dutch population.

Methods

The QoV was translated into Dutch according to standardized methodology. Negative dysphotopsia items were constructed based on focus group interviews, literature review and clinical data. The questionnaire was completed by 404 subjects, including contact lens wearers, patients with cataract and after cataract surgery (95.5% with a monofocal, 4.5% with a multifocal intraocular lens). Rasch analysis was applied for evaluation of reliability and validity of the original QoV and modified version, Negative Dysphotopsia QoV (ND-QoV).

Results

The frequency, severity and bothersome scales of the QoV and ND-QoV demonstrated good measurement precision, good fit statistics for all but one item, but significant mistargeting of more than one logit. Item estimations were stable across the study groups and scales were unidimensional with more than 50% of variance explained by the measurements. There was a positive correlation between questionnaire scores and best corrected visual acuity (r = 0.3, p < 0.01). The quality of vision measured by all three scales was significantly poorer (p < 0.01) in patients with negative dysphotopsia compared to asymptomatic pseudophakic patients.

Conclusion

The Dutch version of the QoV questionnaire has shown good psychometric properties comparable to the native version as well as good reliability and validity. The addition of negative dysphotopsia items is a valuable modification for the reliable assessment of quality of vision in pseudophakic patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量视觉质量,包括阴性视力障碍
目的 调整视觉质量问卷(QoV)以测量阴性视力障碍,并在荷兰人群中验证原始版本和修改版本。 方法 根据标准化方法将 QoV 翻译成荷兰语。根据焦点小组访谈、文献综述和临床数据构建了阴性视线障碍项目。404 名受试者填写了问卷,其中包括隐形眼镜佩戴者、白内障患者和白内障手术后患者(95.5% 配戴单焦人工晶体,4.5% 配戴多焦人工晶体)。对原始 QoV 和改进版 Negative Dysphotopsia QoV(ND-QoV)的信度和效度进行了拉氏分析评估。 结果 QoV 和 ND-QoV 的频率、严重程度和困扰量表显示出良好的测量精度,除一个项目外,其他所有项目的拟合统计都很好,但有一个对数以上的显著误差。各研究组的项目估计值稳定,量表是单维的,50% 以上的方差由测量结果解释。问卷得分与最佳矫正视力之间呈正相关(r = 0.3,p < 0.01)。与无症状的假性视网膜患者相比,阴性视力障碍患者的视力质量明显较差(p < 0.01)。 结论 荷兰语版 QoV 问卷具有良好的心理测量特性,可与母语版本媲美,并具有良好的信度和效度。增加阴性视力障碍项目是对假性视网膜患者视力质量进行可靠评估的一项有价值的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of intravitreal faricimab therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The ever ongoing cosmetic quest to change eye colour. Slowing myopia progression with cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) spectacle lenses-Year 1 results from a 2-year prospective, multi-centre trial. Correlation of retinal fluid and photoreceptor and RPE loss in neovascular AMD by automated quantification, a real-world FRB! analysis. Incidence, risk factors, and patient characteristics in severe contact lens-related microbial keratitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1