Efficacy of tetracaine eye drops in strabismus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Strabismus Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/09273972.2023.2253851
Naser Almekhyal, Salman AlOtaibi, Zayed Alenezi, Salman Almutairi, Fahad Alharbi, Mohammad AlRtam
{"title":"Efficacy of tetracaine eye drops in strabismus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Naser Almekhyal, Salman AlOtaibi, Zayed Alenezi, Salman Almutairi, Fahad Alharbi, Mohammad AlRtam","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2023.2253851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of tetracaine eye drops as a local anesthetic agent among pediatric patients undergoing for strabismus surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systemically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from inception until April 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tetracaine and placebo or no intervention for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in strabismus surgery patients. We used the Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool for the risk of bias assessment. Continuous variables were pooled as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), and categorical variables were pooled as risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 326 patients. There was no significant difference between the tetracaine and the control groups regarding the mean operative time (MD = -0.10 minutes, 95% CI [-3.79, 3.59], <i>p</i> = .96), the mean time to first analgesia (MD = -0.87 minutes, 95% CI [-11.15, 9.40], <i>P</i> = .87), the mean behavior score (SMD = -S0.48, 95% CI [-1.24, 0.28], <i>p</i> = .22), the rate of postoperative vomiting (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [0.62, 2.61], <i>p</i> = .52), or the number of additional analgesia (RR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.27, 1.13], <i>p</i> = .10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in the safety and efficacy of tetracaine eye drops for strabismus surgery when compared to placebo or no intervention. Further investigation is needed to establish the best local anesthetic for strabismus surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2023.2253851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of tetracaine eye drops as a local anesthetic agent among pediatric patients undergoing for strabismus surgery.

Methods: We systemically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from inception until April 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tetracaine and placebo or no intervention for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in strabismus surgery patients. We used the Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool for the risk of bias assessment. Continuous variables were pooled as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), and categorical variables were pooled as risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 326 patients. There was no significant difference between the tetracaine and the control groups regarding the mean operative time (MD = -0.10 minutes, 95% CI [-3.79, 3.59], p = .96), the mean time to first analgesia (MD = -0.87 minutes, 95% CI [-11.15, 9.40], P = .87), the mean behavior score (SMD = -S0.48, 95% CI [-1.24, 0.28], p = .22), the rate of postoperative vomiting (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [0.62, 2.61], p = .52), or the number of additional analgesia (RR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.27, 1.13], p = .10).

Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in the safety and efficacy of tetracaine eye drops for strabismus surgery when compared to placebo or no intervention. Further investigation is needed to establish the best local anesthetic for strabismus surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丁卡因滴眼液在斜视手术中的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:全面评价丁卡因滴眼液作为局部麻醉剂在接受斜视手术的儿童患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:从成立到2023年4月,我们系统地搜索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),比较丁卡因和安慰剂或不干预对斜视手术患者术中和术后结果的影响。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险-2工具进行偏倚风险评估。连续变量合并为平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD),分类变量合并为风险比(RR),置信区间为95%。结果:荟萃分析包括6项随机对照试验,共326名患者。丁卡因组和对照组在平均手术时间方面没有显著差异(MD=0.10 分钟,95%置信区间[3-79,3.59],p = .96),首次镇痛的平均时间(MD = -0.87 分钟,95%置信区间[11.15,9.40],P = .87),平均行为得分(SMD = -S0.48,95%置信区间[1.240.28],p = .22),术后呕吐率(RR = 1.27,95%置信区间[0.62,2.61],p = .52)或额外镇痛次数(RR = 0.55,95%置信区间[0.271.3],p = .10) 。结论:我们的系统综述和荟萃分析发现,与安慰剂或不干预相比,丁卡因滴眼液用于斜视手术的安全性和有效性没有显著差异。需要进一步的研究来确定斜视手术的最佳局部麻醉剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Approach to abnormal head posture. Management of traumatic incomplete lacerating rectus muscle injuries using multimodal imaging approach (ASOCT and CT/MRI). The effect of post-anesthetic administration of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on postoperative agitation of strabismus surgery in children: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Association of smartphones use, ocular symptoms and binocular dysfunctions in adolescents: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Disconjugacies of saccade duration and trajectories in strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1