Use of Intranasal Analgesia in French Armed Forces: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Romain Montagnon, Pierre-Julien Cungi, Olivier Aoun, Gabriel Morand, Jerome Desmottes, Pierre Pasquier, Stephane Travers, Luc Aigle, Christophe Dubecq
{"title":"Use of Intranasal Analgesia in French Armed Forces: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Romain Montagnon,&nbsp;Pierre-Julien Cungi,&nbsp;Olivier Aoun,&nbsp;Gabriel Morand,&nbsp;Jerome Desmottes,&nbsp;Pierre Pasquier,&nbsp;Stephane Travers,&nbsp;Luc Aigle,&nbsp;Christophe Dubecq","doi":"10.55460/TBN6-NJSR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management is essential in military medicine, particularly in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) during deployments in remote and austere settings. The few previously published studies on intranasal analgesia (INA) focused only on the efficacy and onset of action of the medications used (ketamine, sufentanil, and fentanyl). Side-effects were rarely reported. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of intranasal analgesia by French military physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a multicentric survey between 15 January and 14 April 2020. The survey population included all French military physicians in primary-care centers (n = 727) or emergency departments (n = 55) regardless of being stationed in mainland France or French overseas departments and territories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 259 responses (33% responsiveness rate), of which 201 (77.6%) physicians reported being familiar with INA. However, regarding its use, of the 256 physicians with completed surveys, only 47 (18.3%) had already administered it. Emergency medicine physicians supporting highly operational units (e.g., Special Forces) were more familiar with this route of administration and used it more frequently. Ketamine was the most common medication used (n = 32; 57.1%). Finally, 234 (90%) respondents expressed an interest in further education on INA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a majority of French military physicians who replied to the survey were familiar with INA, few used it in practice. This route of administration seems to be a promising medication for remote and austere environments. Specific training should, therefore, be recommended to spread and standardize its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/TBN6-NJSR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain management is essential in military medicine, particularly in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) during deployments in remote and austere settings. The few previously published studies on intranasal analgesia (INA) focused only on the efficacy and onset of action of the medications used (ketamine, sufentanil, and fentanyl). Side-effects were rarely reported. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of intranasal analgesia by French military physicians.

Methods: We carried out a multicentric survey between 15 January and 14 April 2020. The survey population included all French military physicians in primary-care centers (n = 727) or emergency departments (n = 55) regardless of being stationed in mainland France or French overseas departments and territories.

Results: We collected 259 responses (33% responsiveness rate), of which 201 (77.6%) physicians reported being familiar with INA. However, regarding its use, of the 256 physicians with completed surveys, only 47 (18.3%) had already administered it. Emergency medicine physicians supporting highly operational units (e.g., Special Forces) were more familiar with this route of administration and used it more frequently. Ketamine was the most common medication used (n = 32; 57.1%). Finally, 234 (90%) respondents expressed an interest in further education on INA.

Conclusion: Although a majority of French military physicians who replied to the survey were familiar with INA, few used it in practice. This route of administration seems to be a promising medication for remote and austere environments. Specific training should, therefore, be recommended to spread and standardize its use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国武装部队使用鼻内镇痛:横断面调查。
背景:疼痛管理在军事医学中至关重要,尤其是在偏远和艰苦环境中部署的战术战斗伤亡护理(TCCC)中。先前发表的少数关于鼻内镇痛(INA)的研究仅关注所用药物(氯胺酮、舒芬太尼和芬太尼)的疗效和起效情况。副作用很少报道。我们研究的目的是评估法国军医使用鼻内镇痛的情况。方法:我们在2020年1月15日至4月14日期间进行了一项多中心调查。调查人群包括初级保健中心(n=727)或急诊科(n=55)的所有法国军医,无论他们驻扎在法国本土或法国海外部门和地区。结果:我们收集了259份回复(33%的回复率),其中201名(77.6%)医生报告熟悉INA。然而,关于它的使用,在完成调查的256名医生中,只有47人(18.3%)已经使用过它。支持高作战部队(如特种部队)的急诊医生更熟悉这种给药途径,使用频率也更高。氯胺酮是最常用的药物(n=32;57.1%)。最后,234名(90%)受访者表示有兴趣继续接受INA的教育。结论:尽管大多数接受调查的法国军医都熟悉INA,但很少有人在实践中使用它。这种给药途径似乎是一种很有前途的药物,适用于偏远和艰苦的环境。因此,应建议进行具体培训,以推广和规范其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series. REBOA Use in a Medicalized Prehospital Setting Proposal for a First Protocol Based on the Delphi Method. Military Medical Student Specialty Preferences During the DHA Transition: A Retrospective Analysis. The Effect of Radiological Assessment of Volunteers for French Paratrooper Training A Five-Year Retrospective Study. Vascular Repair in Wartime Casualties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1