External validation of the Health Care Homes hospital admission risk stratification tool in the Aboriginal Australian population of the Northern Territory.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1071/AH23017
Laura Goddard, Emma Field, Judy Moran, Julie Franzon, Yuejen Zhao, Paul Burgess
{"title":"External validation of the Health Care Homes hospital admission risk stratification tool in the Aboriginal Australian population of the Northern Territory.","authors":"Laura Goddard,&nbsp;Emma Field,&nbsp;Judy Moran,&nbsp;Julie Franzon,&nbsp;Yuejen Zhao,&nbsp;Paul Burgess","doi":"10.1071/AH23017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study aimed to externally validate the Commonwealth's Health Care Homes (HCH) algorithm for Aboriginal Australians living in the Northern Territory (NT). Methods A retrospective cohort study design using linked primary health care (PHC) and hospital data was used to analyse the performance of the HCH algorithm in predicting the risk of hospitalisation for the NT study population. The study population consisted of Aboriginal Australians residing in the NT who have visited a PHC clinic at one of the 54 NT Government clinics at least once between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. Predictors of hospitalisation included demographics, patient observations, medications, diagnoses, pathology results and previous hospitalisation. Results There were a total of 3256 (28.5%) emergency attendances or preventable hospitalisations during the study period. The HCH algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.58 for the NT remote Aboriginal population, compared with 0.66 in the Victorian cohort. A refitted model including 'previous hospitalisation' had an AUC of 0.72, demonstrating better discrimination than the HCH algorithm. Calibration was also improved in the refitted model, with an intercept of 0.00 and a slope of 1.00, compared with an intercept of 1.29 and a slope of 0.55 in the HCH algorithm. Conclusion The HCH algorithm performed poorly on the NT cohort compared with the Victorian cohort, due to differences in population demographics and burden of disease. A population-specific hospitalisation risk algorithm is required for the NT.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":" ","pages":"521-534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to externally validate the Commonwealth's Health Care Homes (HCH) algorithm for Aboriginal Australians living in the Northern Territory (NT). Methods A retrospective cohort study design using linked primary health care (PHC) and hospital data was used to analyse the performance of the HCH algorithm in predicting the risk of hospitalisation for the NT study population. The study population consisted of Aboriginal Australians residing in the NT who have visited a PHC clinic at one of the 54 NT Government clinics at least once between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. Predictors of hospitalisation included demographics, patient observations, medications, diagnoses, pathology results and previous hospitalisation. Results There were a total of 3256 (28.5%) emergency attendances or preventable hospitalisations during the study period. The HCH algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.58 for the NT remote Aboriginal population, compared with 0.66 in the Victorian cohort. A refitted model including 'previous hospitalisation' had an AUC of 0.72, demonstrating better discrimination than the HCH algorithm. Calibration was also improved in the refitted model, with an intercept of 0.00 and a slope of 1.00, compared with an intercept of 1.29 and a slope of 0.55 in the HCH algorithm. Conclusion The HCH algorithm performed poorly on the NT cohort compared with the Victorian cohort, due to differences in population demographics and burden of disease. A population-specific hospitalisation risk algorithm is required for the NT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在北领地的澳大利亚原住民中,对保健院住院风险分层工具进行外部验证。
目的本研究旨在对居住在北领地(NT)的澳大利亚原住民的联邦医疗保健院(HCH)算法进行外部验证。方法使用关联初级卫生保健(PHC)和医院数据进行回顾性队列研究设计,分析HCH算法在预测NT研究人群住院风险方面的性能。研究人群包括居住在新界的澳大利亚原住民,他们在2013年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间至少去过54家新界政府诊所之一的初级保健诊所一次。住院的预测因素包括人口统计、患者观察、药物、诊断、病理结果和既往住院情况。结果在研究期间,共有3256例(28.5%)急诊就诊或可预防住院。对于NT偏远原住民,HCH算法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.58,而在维多利亚州队列中为0.66。一个包括“先前住院”在内的改装模型的AUC为0.72,显示出比HCH算法更好的辨别力。改装后的模型的校准也得到了改进,截距为0.00,斜率为1.00,而六氯环己烷算法的截距为1.29,斜率为0.55。结论与维多利亚州队列相比,由于人口统计学和疾病负担的差异,HCH算法在NT队列中的表现较差。NT需要特定人群的住院风险算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1