Risk prediction model for cardiovascular diseases in adults initiating pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Evidence Based Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2022-300492
Maja Dobrosavljevic, Seena Fazel, Ebba Du Rietz, Lin Li, Le Zhang, Zheng Chang, Tomas Jernberg, Stephen V Faraone, Johan Jendle, Qi Chen, Isabell Brikell, Henrik Larsson
{"title":"Risk prediction model for cardiovascular diseases in adults initiating pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.","authors":"Maja Dobrosavljevic,&nbsp;Seena Fazel,&nbsp;Ebba Du Rietz,&nbsp;Lin Li,&nbsp;Le Zhang,&nbsp;Zheng Chang,&nbsp;Tomas Jernberg,&nbsp;Stephen V Faraone,&nbsp;Johan Jendle,&nbsp;Qi Chen,&nbsp;Isabell Brikell,&nbsp;Henrik Larsson","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2022-300492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Available prediction models of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) may not accurately predict outcomes among individuals initiating pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve the predictive accuracy of traditional CVD risk factors for adults initiating pharmacological treatment of ADHD, by considering novel CVD risk factors associated with ADHD (comorbid psychiatric disorders, sociodemographic factors and psychotropic medication).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort composed of 24 186 adults residing in Sweden without previous CVDs, born between 1932 and 1990, who started pharmacological treatment of ADHD between 2008 and 2011, and were followed for up to 2 years. CVDs were identified using diagnoses according to the International Classification of Diseases, and dispended medication prescriptions from Swedish national registers. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to derive the prediction model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The developed model included eight traditional and four novel CVD risk factors. The model showed acceptable overall discrimination (C index=0.72, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.74) and calibration (Brier score=0.008). The Integrated Discrimination Improvement index showed a significant improvement after adding novel risk factors (0.003 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.007), p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inclusion of the novel CVD risk factors may provide a better prediction of CVDs in this population compared with traditional CVD predictors only, when the model is used with a continuous risk score. External validation studies and studies assessing clinical impact of the model are warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Individuals initiating pharmacological treatment of ADHD at higher risk of developing CVDs should be more closely monitored.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"25 4","pages":"185-190"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685689/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2022-300492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Available prediction models of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) may not accurately predict outcomes among individuals initiating pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Objective: To improve the predictive accuracy of traditional CVD risk factors for adults initiating pharmacological treatment of ADHD, by considering novel CVD risk factors associated with ADHD (comorbid psychiatric disorders, sociodemographic factors and psychotropic medication).

Methods: The cohort composed of 24 186 adults residing in Sweden without previous CVDs, born between 1932 and 1990, who started pharmacological treatment of ADHD between 2008 and 2011, and were followed for up to 2 years. CVDs were identified using diagnoses according to the International Classification of Diseases, and dispended medication prescriptions from Swedish national registers. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to derive the prediction model.

Findings: The developed model included eight traditional and four novel CVD risk factors. The model showed acceptable overall discrimination (C index=0.72, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.74) and calibration (Brier score=0.008). The Integrated Discrimination Improvement index showed a significant improvement after adding novel risk factors (0.003 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.007), p<0.001).

Conclusions: The inclusion of the novel CVD risk factors may provide a better prediction of CVDs in this population compared with traditional CVD predictors only, when the model is used with a continuous risk score. External validation studies and studies assessing clinical impact of the model are warranted.

Clinical implications: Individuals initiating pharmacological treatment of ADHD at higher risk of developing CVDs should be more closely monitored.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开始对注意力缺陷/多动障碍进行药物治疗的成人心血管疾病的风险预测模型。
背景:现有的心血管疾病(cvd)预测模型可能无法准确预测开始对注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)进行药物治疗的个体的预后。目的:通过考虑与ADHD相关的新型CVD危险因素(共病精神障碍、社会人口因素和精神药物),提高对开始ADHD药物治疗的成人传统CVD危险因素的预测准确性。方法:该队列由24186名居住在瑞典的成年人组成,他们之前没有心血管疾病,出生于1932年至1990年,在2008年至2011年期间开始对ADHD进行药物治疗,随访时间长达2年。根据《国际疾病分类》进行诊断,确定心血管疾病,并从瑞典国家登记处分发药物处方。采用Cox比例风险回归建立预测模型。结果:建立的模型包括8个传统的心血管疾病危险因素和4个新的心血管疾病危险因素。模型总体判别(C指数=0.72,95% CI = 0.70 ~ 0.74)和校正(Brier评分=0.008)均可接受。在加入新的危险因素后,综合判别改善指数显示显著改善(0.003 (95% CI 0.001至0.007))。结论:当模型与连续风险评分一起使用时,与传统CVD预测因子相比,纳入新的CVD危险因素可以更好地预测该人群的CVD。外部验证研究和评估模型临床影响的研究是必要的。临床意义:开始ADHD药物治疗的个体发生心血管疾病的风险较高,应该更密切地监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
期刊最新文献
Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis. Important adverse events to be evaluated in antidepressant trials and meta-analyses in depression: a large international preference study including patients and healthcare professionals. Comparison of prediction methods for treatment continuation of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Components of smartphone cognitive-behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression among 1093 university students: a factorial trial. Associations between antipsychotics and risk of violent crimes and suicidal behaviour in personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1