Perceived attitudes and barriers towards medical research: a survey of Jordanian interns, residents, and other postgraduates.

Jamil AlMohtasib, Leen Al-Huneidy, Hana Taha, Rama Rayyan, Shahd Mansour, Jehad Samhouri, Muhammad Hammouri, Hussam Al-Somadi, Adees Wirtan Bedros, Jaafar Al-Omairi, Rand Abbas, Mustafa Ibrahim Abu-Usba, Abdallah Al-Ani
{"title":"Perceived attitudes and barriers towards medical research: a survey of Jordanian interns, residents, and other postgraduates.","authors":"Jamil AlMohtasib,&nbsp;Leen Al-Huneidy,&nbsp;Hana Taha,&nbsp;Rama Rayyan,&nbsp;Shahd Mansour,&nbsp;Jehad Samhouri,&nbsp;Muhammad Hammouri,&nbsp;Hussam Al-Somadi,&nbsp;Adees Wirtan Bedros,&nbsp;Jaafar Al-Omairi,&nbsp;Rand Abbas,&nbsp;Mustafa Ibrahim Abu-Usba,&nbsp;Abdallah Al-Ani","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2023.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated research barriers among Jordanian medical postgraduates to understand the current context of the local health research landscape and improve scholarly output.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a validated questionnaire, Jordanian interns, residents, specialists, and consultants were examined for their perceived attitudes and barriers towards research. Participants were conveniently sampled from public, university, military, and private institutions. Differences in responses were examined using the Student t-test and analysis of variance. Binary logistic regression was utilized to examine predictors of being able to publish.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,141 Jordanian medical postgraduates were recruited, of which 61.3% were junior postgraduates (i.e., interns and residents in their first 2 years of residency) while 38.7% were senior postgraduates (i.e., senior residents, specialists, and consultants). Around 76.0% of participants had no peer-reviewed publications. Of those with least one publication (n=273), only 31.1% had first authorships. Participants portrayed dominantly positive attitudes towards the importance of research. There were no significant differences between junior and senior postgraduates for overall attitudes (p=0.486) and knowledge barriers scores (p=0.0261). Conversely, senior postgraduates demonstrated higher mean organizational barriers (p&lt;0.001). Seniority (odds ratio [OR], 5.268; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.341-8.307), age (OR, 1.087; 95% CI, 1.019-1.159), academic standing (OR, 1.730; 95% CI, 1.103-2.715), and confidence (OR, 1.086; 95% CI, 1.009-1.169) were positive predictors of publication in peer reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Jordanian medical research landscape is riddled with all forms of different barriers. The reworking of current and integration of new research training programs are of utmost importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"35 3","pages":"249-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/24/kjme-2023-263.PMC10493401.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated research barriers among Jordanian medical postgraduates to understand the current context of the local health research landscape and improve scholarly output.

Methods: Using a validated questionnaire, Jordanian interns, residents, specialists, and consultants were examined for their perceived attitudes and barriers towards research. Participants were conveniently sampled from public, university, military, and private institutions. Differences in responses were examined using the Student t-test and analysis of variance. Binary logistic regression was utilized to examine predictors of being able to publish.

Results: A total of 1,141 Jordanian medical postgraduates were recruited, of which 61.3% were junior postgraduates (i.e., interns and residents in their first 2 years of residency) while 38.7% were senior postgraduates (i.e., senior residents, specialists, and consultants). Around 76.0% of participants had no peer-reviewed publications. Of those with least one publication (n=273), only 31.1% had first authorships. Participants portrayed dominantly positive attitudes towards the importance of research. There were no significant differences between junior and senior postgraduates for overall attitudes (p=0.486) and knowledge barriers scores (p=0.0261). Conversely, senior postgraduates demonstrated higher mean organizational barriers (p<0.001). Seniority (odds ratio [OR], 5.268; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.341-8.307), age (OR, 1.087; 95% CI, 1.019-1.159), academic standing (OR, 1.730; 95% CI, 1.103-2.715), and confidence (OR, 1.086; 95% CI, 1.009-1.169) were positive predictors of publication in peer reviewed journals.

Conclusion: The Jordanian medical research landscape is riddled with all forms of different barriers. The reworking of current and integration of new research training programs are of utmost importance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对医学研究的认知态度和障碍:对约旦实习生、住院医生和其他研究生的调查。
目的:我们调查了约旦医学研究生的研究障碍,以了解当地卫生研究景观的当前背景,并提高学术产出。方法:采用一份有效的调查问卷,对约旦实习生、住院医师、专家和咨询师进行调查,了解他们对研究的感知态度和障碍。参与者从公共、大学、军队和私人机构中方便地取样。使用学生t检验和方差分析来检验反应的差异。使用二元逻辑回归来检验能够发表的预测因子。结果:共招募了1141名约旦医学研究生,其中61.3%为初级研究生(即实习医师和住院医师前2年),38.7%为高级研究生(即高级住院医师、专家和顾问)。约76.0%的参与者没有经过同行评审的出版物。在至少发表过一篇论文的人中(n=273),只有31.1%是第一作者。参与者对研究的重要性表现出积极的态度。大三研究生和大四研究生在总体态度(p=0.486)和知识障碍得分(p=0.0261)上无显著差异。相反,高级研究生表现出更高的平均组织障碍(p<0.001)。资历(优势比[OR], 5.268;95%可信区间[CI], 3.341-8.307)、年龄(OR, 1.087;95% CI, 1.019-1.159),学术地位(OR, 1.730;95% CI, 1.103-2.715),置信度(OR, 1.086;95% CI, 1.009-1.169)是发表在同行评议期刊上的积极预测因子。结论:约旦的医学研究领域充满了各种形式的障碍。对现有研究训练计划的重新设计和新研究训练计划的整合至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model. "Hey, can I go home?": a qualitative case study of wellbeing and the work environment in surgical training. Behind the scenes: teachers collaboration to facilitate interprofessional education between medical and pharmacy students in Indonesia. Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement. Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1