Educational implications of assessing learning outcomes with multiple choice questions and short essay questions.

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2023.266
Hyo-Jin Kwon, Su Jin Chae, Joo Hyun Park
{"title":"Educational implications of assessing learning outcomes with multiple choice questions and short essay questions.","authors":"Hyo-Jin Kwon, Su Jin Chae, Joo Hyun Park","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2023.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the characteristics of different item types to assess learning outcomes and explore the educational implications that can be obtained from the results of learning outcome assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five second-year premedical students participated in this study. Multiple choice question (MCQ) and short essay question (SEQ) scores and pass rates for 10 learning outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between SEQs and pass rate but there was no significant correlation between MCQs and pass rate. Some students with identical scores on the MCQs had different scores on the SEQs or on the learning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that students' achievement of learning outcomes can be assessed using various types of questions in outcome-based education.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"35 3","pages":"285-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/82/kjme-2023-266.PMC10493409.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the characteristics of different item types to assess learning outcomes and explore the educational implications that can be obtained from the results of learning outcome assessments.

Methods: Forty-five second-year premedical students participated in this study. Multiple choice question (MCQ) and short essay question (SEQ) scores and pass rates for 10 learning outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were used to analyze the data.

Results: The correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between SEQs and pass rate but there was no significant correlation between MCQs and pass rate. Some students with identical scores on the MCQs had different scores on the SEQs or on the learning outcomes.

Conclusion: This study showed that students' achievement of learning outcomes can be assessed using various types of questions in outcome-based education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用选择题和短文题评估学习成果的教育意义。
目的:本研究调查了评估学习成果的不同项目类型的特点,并探讨了从学习成果评估结果中可以获得的教育意义:方法:45 名医学预科二年级学生参与了本研究。分析了 10 项学习成果的多项选择题(MCQ)和短文题(SEQ)得分和及格率。数据分析采用了描述性统计和相关分析:相关分析表明,SEQ 与及格率之间存在显著相关,但 MCQ 与及格率之间没有显著相关。一些 MCQ 分数相同的学生,其 SEQ 或学习成果的分数却不同:本研究表明,在基于结果的教育中,可以使用各种类型的问题来评估学生的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model. "Hey, can I go home?": a qualitative case study of wellbeing and the work environment in surgical training. Behind the scenes: teachers collaboration to facilitate interprofessional education between medical and pharmacy students in Indonesia. Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement. Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1