Association of Early Beta-Blocker Exposure and Functional Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.

Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Sunny Yang Liu, Nancy Temkin, Jason Barber, Jordan Komisarow, Geoffrey Manley, Tetsu Ohnuma, Katharine Colton, Miriam M Treggiari, Eric E Monson, Monica S Vavilala, Ramesh Grandhi, Daniel T Laskowitz, Joseph P Mathew, Adrian Hernandez, Michael L James, Karthik Raghunathan, Ben Goldstein, Amy J Markowitz, Vijay Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"Association of Early Beta-Blocker Exposure and Functional Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.","authors":"Margot Kelly-Hedrick,&nbsp;Sunny Yang Liu,&nbsp;Nancy Temkin,&nbsp;Jason Barber,&nbsp;Jordan Komisarow,&nbsp;Geoffrey Manley,&nbsp;Tetsu Ohnuma,&nbsp;Katharine Colton,&nbsp;Miriam M Treggiari,&nbsp;Eric E Monson,&nbsp;Monica S Vavilala,&nbsp;Ramesh Grandhi,&nbsp;Daniel T Laskowitz,&nbsp;Joseph P Mathew,&nbsp;Adrian Hernandez,&nbsp;Michael L James,&nbsp;Karthik Raghunathan,&nbsp;Ben Goldstein,&nbsp;Amy J Markowitz,&nbsp;Vijay Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to 1) describe patterns of beta-blocker utilization among critically ill patients following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 2) examine the association of early beta-blocker exposure with functional and clinical outcomes following injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICUs at 18 level I, U.S. trauma centers in the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Greater than or equal to 17 years enrolled in the TRACK-TBI study with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale of <13) were admitted to the ICU after a blunt TBI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Primary exposure was a beta blocker during the first 7 days in the ICU, with a primary outcome of 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Secondary outcomes included: length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, 6-month and 12-month mortality, 12-month GOSE score, and 6-month and 12-month measures of disability, well-being, quality of life, and life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Of the 450 eligible participants, 57 (13%) received early beta blockers (BB<sup>+</sup> group). The BB<sup>+</sup> group was on average older, more likely to be on a preinjury beta blocker, and more likely to have a history of hypertension. In the BB<sup>+</sup> group, 34 participants (60%) received metoprolol only, 19 participants (33%) received propranolol only, 3 participants (5%) received both, and 1 participant (2%) received atenolol only. In multivariable regression, there was no difference in the odds of a higher GOSE score at 6 months between the BB<sup>+</sup> group and BB<sup>-</sup> group (odds ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-1.53). There was no association between BB exposure and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>About one-sixth of subjects in our study received early beta blockers, and within this group, dose, and timing of beta-blocker administration varied substantially. No significant differences in GOSE score at 6 months were demonstrated, although our ability to draw conclusions is limited by overall low total doses administered compared with prior studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/ff/cc9-5-e0958.PMC10484371.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to 1) describe patterns of beta-blocker utilization among critically ill patients following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 2) examine the association of early beta-blocker exposure with functional and clinical outcomes following injury.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: ICUs at 18 level I, U.S. trauma centers in the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study.

Patients: Greater than or equal to 17 years enrolled in the TRACK-TBI study with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale of <13) were admitted to the ICU after a blunt TBI.

Interventions: None.

Measurements: Primary exposure was a beta blocker during the first 7 days in the ICU, with a primary outcome of 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Secondary outcomes included: length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, 6-month and 12-month mortality, 12-month GOSE score, and 6-month and 12-month measures of disability, well-being, quality of life, and life satisfaction.

Main results: Of the 450 eligible participants, 57 (13%) received early beta blockers (BB+ group). The BB+ group was on average older, more likely to be on a preinjury beta blocker, and more likely to have a history of hypertension. In the BB+ group, 34 participants (60%) received metoprolol only, 19 participants (33%) received propranolol only, 3 participants (5%) received both, and 1 participant (2%) received atenolol only. In multivariable regression, there was no difference in the odds of a higher GOSE score at 6 months between the BB+ group and BB- group (odds ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-1.53). There was no association between BB exposure and secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: About one-sixth of subjects in our study received early beta blockers, and within this group, dose, and timing of beta-blocker administration varied substantially. No significant differences in GOSE score at 6 months were demonstrated, although our ability to draw conclusions is limited by overall low total doses administered compared with prior studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中重度颅脑损伤危重患者早期β受体阻滞剂暴露与功能结局的关系:一项临床研究和颅脑损伤研究的转变
目的:我们的目的是:1)描述中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后危重患者使用β受体阻滞剂的模式;2)检查早期β受体阻滞剂暴露与损伤后功能和临床结果的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:美国创伤中心18个I级icu进行TBI临床研究和知识转化(TRACK-TBI)研究。患者:参加TRACK-TBI研究大于或等于17年的中重度TBI患者(格拉斯哥昏迷干预量表:无)。测量:在ICU的前7天主要暴露于β受体阻滞剂,6个月格拉斯哥结局量表扩展(GOSE)的主要结局。次要结局包括:住院时间、住院死亡率、6个月和12个月死亡率、12个月GOSE评分、6个月和12个月的残疾、健康、生活质量和生活满意度。主要结果:在450名符合条件的参与者中,57名(13%)接受了早期β受体阻滞剂(BB+组)。BB+组平均年龄更大,更有可能在损伤前使用β受体阻滞剂,更有可能有高血压病史。在BB+组中,34名参与者(60%)只服用美托洛尔,19名参与者(33%)只服用心得安,3名参与者(5%)同时服用两种药物,1名参与者(2%)只服用阿替洛尔。在多变量回归中,BB+组和BB-组6个月时GOSE评分较高的几率无差异(比值比= 0.86;95% ci, 0.48-1.53)。BB暴露与次要结果之间没有关联。结论:在我们的研究中,大约六分之一的受试者接受了早期受体阻滞剂治疗,在这一组中,受体阻滞剂的剂量和给药时间变化很大。6个月时的GOSE评分没有显著差异,尽管与先前的研究相比,我们得出结论的能力受到总体总剂量较低的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1