A systematic review of smartphone applications for cancer survivors.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s11764-023-01435-9
Krisha Changrani, Sophie Chima, Arun Sharma, Gil-Gyu Han, Anushka Sharma, Mairead McNamara, Michael Jefford, Jon Emery, Paige Druce
{"title":"A systematic review of smartphone applications for cancer survivors.","authors":"Krisha Changrani, Sophie Chima, Arun Sharma, Gil-Gyu Han, Anushka Sharma, Mairead McNamara, Michael Jefford, Jon Emery, Paige Druce","doi":"10.1007/s11764-023-01435-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mobile phone applications are positioned to support, educate, and empower cancer survivors during post-treatment care. We undertook a review to assess the utility of such smartphone applications; determine whether their use correlates with improved quality of life and other self-reported outcomes; and understand the feasibility of integrating mobile apps into routine follow-up care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies evaluating apps that addressed at least one of the five Cancer Survivorship Care Quality Framework (CSCQF) domains published up until December 2021. Studies were narratively synthesized. Implementation barriers and facilitators were mapped against the Technology Acceptance Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three primary studies were included in this review. Only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Studies generally found mobile apps to be feasible, acceptable, and well-placed to support survivorship care. Health promotion was the most predominant CSCQF domain with apps primarily aiming to support exercise and dietary changes. The domains of monitoring for cancer recurrence (n=5) and management of co-morbidities (n=1) were underrepresented. Barriers to app use included greater time since active treatment, lack of familiarity with technology, and content not tailored to the user.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mobile apps are both feasible and acceptable in supporting the transition between active treatment and follow-up care. However, understanding the utility of such apps is limited by the low number of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Mobile apps have the potential to be useful support tools for patients post-treatment. However, given the number of apps developed, targeted, and available to cancer survivors, practical guidance to help cancer survivors choose appropriate apps is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":"1951-1973"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01435-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Mobile phone applications are positioned to support, educate, and empower cancer survivors during post-treatment care. We undertook a review to assess the utility of such smartphone applications; determine whether their use correlates with improved quality of life and other self-reported outcomes; and understand the feasibility of integrating mobile apps into routine follow-up care.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies evaluating apps that addressed at least one of the five Cancer Survivorship Care Quality Framework (CSCQF) domains published up until December 2021. Studies were narratively synthesized. Implementation barriers and facilitators were mapped against the Technology Acceptance Model.

Results: Twenty-three primary studies were included in this review. Only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Studies generally found mobile apps to be feasible, acceptable, and well-placed to support survivorship care. Health promotion was the most predominant CSCQF domain with apps primarily aiming to support exercise and dietary changes. The domains of monitoring for cancer recurrence (n=5) and management of co-morbidities (n=1) were underrepresented. Barriers to app use included greater time since active treatment, lack of familiarity with technology, and content not tailored to the user.

Conclusions: Mobile apps are both feasible and acceptable in supporting the transition between active treatment and follow-up care. However, understanding the utility of such apps is limited by the low number of RCTs.

Implications for cancer survivors: Mobile apps have the potential to be useful support tools for patients post-treatment. However, given the number of apps developed, targeted, and available to cancer survivors, practical guidance to help cancer survivors choose appropriate apps is needed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对癌症幸存者的智能手机应用系统综述。
目的:手机应用程序的定位是在治疗后护理期间为癌症幸存者提供支持、教育和授权。我们进行了一项综述,以评估此类智能手机应用的效用;确定其使用是否与生活质量的改善及其他自我报告的结果相关;并了解将手机应用整合到常规后续护理中的可行性:方法:检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Emcare和PsycINFO数据库中截至2021年12月发布的评估应用程序的研究,这些应用程序至少涉及癌症生存期护理质量框架(CSCQF)五个领域中的一个。对研究进行了叙述性综合。根据技术接受模型对实施障碍和促进因素进行了映射:本综述共纳入 23 项主要研究。仅发现了三项随机对照试验(RCT)。研究普遍认为,移动应用程序在支持幸存者护理方面是可行的、可接受的,而且定位准确。健康促进是最主要的 CSCQF 领域,应用程序的主要目的是支持运动和饮食改变。癌症复发监测领域(5 个)和并发症管理领域(1 个)所占比例较低。使用应用程序的障碍包括:积极治疗时间较长、不熟悉技术以及内容不适合用户:移动应用程序在支持积极治疗和后续护理之间的过渡方面既可行又可接受。结论:在支持积极治疗和后续护理之间的过渡方面,移动应用程序既可行又可接受,但由于研究性试验的数量较少,对此类应用程序效用的了解还很有限:移动应用程序有可能成为患者治疗后的有用支持工具。然而,鉴于为癌症幸存者开发的、有针对性的和可用的应用程序数量众多,需要提供实用指导,帮助癌症幸存者选择合适的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Psychological and physical function in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant survivors with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Fear of cancer recurrence and its predictors among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sexual satisfaction in prostate cancer: a multi-group comparison study of treated patients, patients under active surveillance, patients with negative biopsy, and controls. Quality of life assessment in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumour survivors. State of research, feasibility, safety, acceptability, and outcomes examined on remotely delivered exercises using technology for older adult with cancer: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1