Robotic-assisted Navigation Bronchoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Yield and Complications.

Fahim F Pyarali, Niv Hakami-Majd, Wesam Sabbahi, George Chaux
{"title":"Robotic-assisted Navigation Bronchoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Yield and Complications.","authors":"Fahim F Pyarali, Niv Hakami-Majd, Wesam Sabbahi, George Chaux","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted navigation bronchoscopy (RANB) is a novel method to biopsy lung nodules, with initial reports demonstrating excellent accuracy. We aimed to evaluate pooled estimates of diagnostic yields and complication rates with RANB by performing a meta-analysis of the available literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 3 databases, including PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science. The resulting abstracts were reviewed by 2 investigators. Analyses were performed using random effects models, and diagnostic yield and complication rates were estimated after the Freeman-Tukey transformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 articles, comprising 1409 patients and 1541 nodules, were included in the final analysis. Mean ages ranged from 63.2 to 69.3 years. The average size of the nodules ranged between 5.9 and 25.0 mm. Most patients (54.0% to 92.0%) had a current or prior smoking history in studies that reported them (n=8). The pooled diagnostic yield was 81.9% (12 studies, 838 nodules, 95% CI: 83.4%-91.0%), and the pooled sensitivity for malignancy was 87.6% (8 studies, 699 nodules, 95% CI: 81.3%-89.5%). The pooled incidence of pneumothorax rates was 0.60% (95% CI: 0.11%-1.35%). The pooled incidence of major bleeding was <0.01%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic yield for patients with pulmonary nodules undergoing RANB is high, though may be impacted by the prevalence of malignancy, participant selection, and publication bias. Complication rates, including pneumothoraces and bleeding rates, appear low across all studies. If RANB is available, clinicians should consider utilizing this platform to biopsy pulmonary nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted navigation bronchoscopy (RANB) is a novel method to biopsy lung nodules, with initial reports demonstrating excellent accuracy. We aimed to evaluate pooled estimates of diagnostic yields and complication rates with RANB by performing a meta-analysis of the available literature.

Methods: We searched 3 databases, including PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science. The resulting abstracts were reviewed by 2 investigators. Analyses were performed using random effects models, and diagnostic yield and complication rates were estimated after the Freeman-Tukey transformation.

Results: A total of 23 articles, comprising 1409 patients and 1541 nodules, were included in the final analysis. Mean ages ranged from 63.2 to 69.3 years. The average size of the nodules ranged between 5.9 and 25.0 mm. Most patients (54.0% to 92.0%) had a current or prior smoking history in studies that reported them (n=8). The pooled diagnostic yield was 81.9% (12 studies, 838 nodules, 95% CI: 83.4%-91.0%), and the pooled sensitivity for malignancy was 87.6% (8 studies, 699 nodules, 95% CI: 81.3%-89.5%). The pooled incidence of pneumothorax rates was 0.60% (95% CI: 0.11%-1.35%). The pooled incidence of major bleeding was <0.01%.

Conclusion: Diagnostic yield for patients with pulmonary nodules undergoing RANB is high, though may be impacted by the prevalence of malignancy, participant selection, and publication bias. Complication rates, including pneumothoraces and bleeding rates, appear low across all studies. If RANB is available, clinicians should consider utilizing this platform to biopsy pulmonary nodules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助导航支气管镜检查:诊断率和并发症的 Meta 分析。
背景:机器人辅助导航支气管镜检查(RANB)是一种新型的肺结节活检方法,初步报告显示其准确性极高。我们旨在通过对现有文献进行荟萃分析,评估 RANB 诊断率和并发症发生率的综合估计值:我们检索了 3 个数据库,包括 PubMed、EmBase 和 Web of Science。结果摘要由两名研究人员审阅。使用随机效应模型进行分析,并在弗里曼-图基转换后估算诊断率和并发症发生率:最终分析共纳入 23 篇文章,包括 1409 名患者和 1541 个结节。平均年龄从 63.2 岁到 69.3 岁不等。结节的平均大小在 5.9 至 25.0 毫米之间。在报告吸烟史的研究中,大多数患者(54.0% 至 92.0%)目前或以前有吸烟史(8 例)。汇总诊断率为 81.9%(12 项研究,838 个结节,95% CI:83.4%-91.0%),汇总恶性肿瘤敏感性为 87.6%(8 项研究,699 个结节,95% CI:81.3%-89.5%)。汇总的气胸发生率为 0.60%(95% CI:0.11%-1.35%)。大出血的汇总发生率为结论:接受 RANB 检查的肺结节患者的诊断率很高,但可能会受到恶性肿瘤发病率、参与者选择和发表偏倚的影响。在所有研究中,包括气胸和出血率在内的并发症发生率似乎都很低。如果可以使用 RANB,临床医生应考虑使用该平台对肺结节进行活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
期刊最新文献
Ibrutinib and Bleeding Hazards During Bronchoscopy. Rapid Pleurodesis in Patients With Chronic Noninfectious Pleural Effusion: Twenty Years of Real-world Performance Data. Safety and Efficacy of Rigid Bronchoscopy-guided Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy: A Single-center Experience. Diagnostic Value and Safety of Addition of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration to Transbronchial Biopsy Through Endobronchial Ultrasonography Using a Guide Sheath Under Virtual Bronchoscopic Navigation for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. Percutaneous Airway Silicone Stent External Fixation Outcomes and Techniques: Case Series With Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1