Rotation of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Cultivars and Fallow on Yield and Rotylenchulus reniformis.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Journal of nematology Pub Date : 2023-06-06 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0024
Casiani Soto-Ramos, Terry A Wheeler, Jonathan Shockey, Cecilia Monclova-Santana
{"title":"Rotation of Cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i>) Cultivars and Fallow on Yield and <i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i>.","authors":"Casiani Soto-Ramos, Terry A Wheeler, Jonathan Shockey, Cecilia Monclova-Santana","doi":"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A three-year rotation of cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i>) cultivars either resistant (R) or susceptible (S) to <i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i> and fallow (F) was examined for effect on cotton yield and nematode density. In year 1, 2, and 3, the resistant cultivar (DP 2143NR B3XF) yielded 78, 77, and 113% higher than the susceptible cultivar (DP 2044 B3XF). Fallow in year 1 followed by S in year 2 (F1S2) improved yield in year 2 by 24% compared with S1S2, but not as much as R1S2 (41% yield increase over S1S2). One year of fallow followed by R (F1R2) had lower yield in year 2 (11% reduction) than R1R2. The highest yield after three years of these rotations occurred with R1R2R3, followed by R1S2R3 (17% less yield) and F1F2S3 (35% less yield). <i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i> density in soil averaged 57, 65, and 70% lower (year 1, 2, 3, respectively) in R1R2R3 compared with S1S2S3. In years 1 and 2, LOG<sub>10</sub> transformed nematode density (LREN) was lower in F1, and F1F2, than for all other combinations. In year 3, the lowest LREN were associated with R1R2R3, F1S2F3, and F1F2S3. The highest LREN were associated with F1R2S3, F1S2S3, S1S2S3, R1R2S3, and R1S2S3. The combination of higher yield and lower nematode density will be a strong incentive for producers to use the <i>R. reniformis</i> resistant cultivars continuously.</p>","PeriodicalId":16475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nematology","volume":"55 1","pages":"20230024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nematology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A three-year rotation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars either resistant (R) or susceptible (S) to Rotylenchulus reniformis and fallow (F) was examined for effect on cotton yield and nematode density. In year 1, 2, and 3, the resistant cultivar (DP 2143NR B3XF) yielded 78, 77, and 113% higher than the susceptible cultivar (DP 2044 B3XF). Fallow in year 1 followed by S in year 2 (F1S2) improved yield in year 2 by 24% compared with S1S2, but not as much as R1S2 (41% yield increase over S1S2). One year of fallow followed by R (F1R2) had lower yield in year 2 (11% reduction) than R1R2. The highest yield after three years of these rotations occurred with R1R2R3, followed by R1S2R3 (17% less yield) and F1F2S3 (35% less yield). Rotylenchulus reniformis density in soil averaged 57, 65, and 70% lower (year 1, 2, 3, respectively) in R1R2R3 compared with S1S2S3. In years 1 and 2, LOG10 transformed nematode density (LREN) was lower in F1, and F1F2, than for all other combinations. In year 3, the lowest LREN were associated with R1R2R3, F1S2F3, and F1F2S3. The highest LREN were associated with F1R2S3, F1S2S3, S1S2S3, R1R2S3, and R1S2S3. The combination of higher yield and lower nematode density will be a strong incentive for producers to use the R. reniformis resistant cultivars continuously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棉花(Gossypium hirsutum)品种的轮作和对产量和肾形Rotylenchulus reniformis的影响。
对棉花(Gossypium hirsutum)品种(R)或敏感(S)对肾形Rotylenchulus reniformis和休耕(F)的抗性(R)和敏感性(S)进行了为期三年的轮作,以研究其对棉花产量和线虫密度的影响。在第1、2和3年,抗性品种(DP 2143NR B3XF)的产量分别比感病品种(DP 2044 B3XF)高78、77和113%。与S1S2相比,第二年的产量提高了24%,但没有R1S2那么多(比S1S2增产41%)。休耕一年后进行R(F1R2),第2年的产量(减少11%)低于R1R2。这些轮作三年后产量最高的是R1R2R3,其次是R1S2R3(产量减少17%)和F1F2S3(产量减少35%)。与S1S2S3相比,R1R2R3土壤中肾形Rotylenchulus reniformis的密度平均低57%、65%和70%(分别为第1年、第2年和第3年)。在第1年和第2年,F1和F1F2的LOG10转化线虫密度(LREN)低于所有其他组合。在第3年,最低LREN与R1R2R3、F1S2F3和F1F2S3相关。最高LREN与F1R2S3、F1S2S3、S1S2S3、R1R2S3和R1S2S3相关。较高的产量和较低的线虫密度相结合,将有力地激励生产商继续使用肾形R.reniformis抗性品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nematology
Journal of nematology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nematology is the official technical and scientific communication publication of the Society of Nematologists since 1969. The journal publishes original papers on all aspects of basic, applied, descriptive, theoretical or experimental nematology and adheres to strict peer-review policy. Other categories of papers include invited reviews, research notes, abstracts of papers presented at annual meetings, and special publications as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Meloidogyne marylandi is Involved in, but not the Primary Cause of Creeping Bentgrass Decline of Putting Greens in Southern California. Population Dynamics of Mesocriconema xenoplax Parasitizing Sweet Cherry Trees in British Columbia, Canada. The Rate of Decline of Sugarbeet Cyst Nematode in Central California Under Nonhost Crops May Impact Biofuel Production. Description of Panagrolaimus namibiensis n. sp. (Rhabditida: Panagrolaimidae), an Anhydrobiotic Nematode from the Namib Desert of Namibia. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Meloidogyne arenaria () Populations Parasitizing Pistachio in Kerman and Khorasan Razavi Provinces, Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1