The Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy for Critically Injured Patients (RESTRIC) trial: a cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial of restrictive transfusion in trauma.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1186/s40560-023-00682-3
Mineji Hayakawa, Takashi Tagami, Daisuke Kudo, Kota Ono, Makoto Aoki, Akira Endo, Tetsuya Yumoto, Yosuke Matsumura, Shiho Irino, Kazuhiko Sekine, Noritaka Ushio, Takayuki Ogura, Sho Nachi, Yuhei Irie, Katsura Hayakawa, Yusuke Ito, Yuko Okishio, Tomohiro Muronoi, Yoshinori Kosaki, Kaori Ito, Keita Nakatsutsumi, Yutaka Kondo, Taichiro Ueda, Hiroshi Fukuma, Yuichi Saisaka, Naoki Tominaga, Takeo Kurita, Fumihiko Nakayama, Tomotaka Shibata, Shigeki Kushimoto
{"title":"The Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy for Critically Injured Patients (RESTRIC) trial: a cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial of restrictive transfusion in trauma.","authors":"Mineji Hayakawa,&nbsp;Takashi Tagami,&nbsp;Daisuke Kudo,&nbsp;Kota Ono,&nbsp;Makoto Aoki,&nbsp;Akira Endo,&nbsp;Tetsuya Yumoto,&nbsp;Yosuke Matsumura,&nbsp;Shiho Irino,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Sekine,&nbsp;Noritaka Ushio,&nbsp;Takayuki Ogura,&nbsp;Sho Nachi,&nbsp;Yuhei Irie,&nbsp;Katsura Hayakawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Ito,&nbsp;Yuko Okishio,&nbsp;Tomohiro Muronoi,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kosaki,&nbsp;Kaori Ito,&nbsp;Keita Nakatsutsumi,&nbsp;Yutaka Kondo,&nbsp;Taichiro Ueda,&nbsp;Hiroshi Fukuma,&nbsp;Yuichi Saisaka,&nbsp;Naoki Tominaga,&nbsp;Takeo Kurita,&nbsp;Fumihiko Nakayama,&nbsp;Tomotaka Shibata,&nbsp;Shigeki Kushimoto","doi":"10.1186/s40560-023-00682-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7-9 or 10-12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00682-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase.

Methods: This cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7-9 or 10-12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%.

Results: The 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days.

Conclusions: Although non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume.

Trial registration number: umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重伤员限制性红细胞输血策略(restrc)试验:一项创伤限制性输血的聚类随机、交叉、非劣效性多中心试验。
背景:新鲜冷冻血浆和凝血因子输注在创伤后急性期治疗创伤性凝血功能障碍的疗效已被广泛评价。然而,红细胞输注在严重创伤患者中的疗效尚未得到充分的研究,在急性损伤后和复苏阶段的最佳血红蛋白目标水平仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在研究在急性损伤后阶段,限制性输血策略在临床上是否优于自由输血策略。方法:在日本22家三级急诊医疗机构开展了一项聚类随机、交叉、非劣效性的多中心试验,纳入了有大出血风险的严重创伤成年患者。这些机构被分配了限制性或自由输血策略(目标血红蛋白水平:分别为7-9或10-12 g/dL)。这些策略在患者到达急诊科后立即应用。主要观察指标是到达急诊科后的28天生存率。次要结局包括输血量、并发症发生率和无事件天数。非劣效性裕度设定为3%。结果:限制策略组(n = 216)和自由策略组(n = 195)患者28天生存率分别为92.1%和91.3%。限制性与自由策略组28天生存率的调整优势比为1.02(95%可信区间:0.49-2.13)。未观察到显著的非劣效性。限制策略组输血量和血红蛋白水平低于自由策略组。并发症发生率和无事件天数组间无差异。结论:尽管限制性和自由输血策略对28天生存率的非劣效性无统计学意义,但两组之间的死亡率和并发症发生率相似。限制性输血策略导致较低的输血量。试验注册号:umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405,注册日期:2018年10月8日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with critical acute pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2. Increased national critical care demands were associated with a higher mortality of intubated COVID-19 patients in Japan: a retrospective observational study. Current status of bacteriophage therapy for severe bacterial infections. Height status matters for risk of mortality in critically ill children. Hemorrhages and risk factors in patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis in a respiratory critical care unit: a secondary data analysis of a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1