Histological examination of tooth-derived biomaterials obtained from different devices.

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Expert Review of Medical Devices Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2251891

Robert Dłucik, Bogusława Orzechowska-Wylęgała, Daniel Dłucik, Katarzyna Bogus

{"title":"Histological examination of tooth-derived biomaterials obtained from different devices.","authors":"Robert Dłucik, Bogusława Orzechowska-Wylęgała, Daniel Dłucik, Katarzyna Bogus","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2251891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate the histological differences between samples processed by different devices and to confirm safe clinical application of different dentin matrix obtained from three devices: BonMaker, Tooth Transformer, and Smart Dentin Grinder in regeneration of maxillary defects.Research design: The study involved 39 patients with two-wall or three-wall defects who underwent bone augmentation procedures in the maxilla using dentin matrix grafts from the BonMaker, Tooth Transformer, and Smart Dentin Grinder devices. Histological examination was conducted on samples obtained from patients who received each device. In this article, histological samples have been selected and are presented.Results: In all patients, bone defects were successfully augmented with ground dentin matrix. The histological examination revealed no inflammation and a good connection between the bone and dentin matrix and clinically all patients were qualified for implant placement.Conclusions: After comparing the BonMaker, Tooth Transformer, and Smart Dentin Grinder devices in our practice, we concluded that all these systems have the potential for obtaining regenerative material from the patient's teeth.","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":" ","pages":"979-988"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2251891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate the histological differences between samples processed by different devices and to confirm safe clinical application of different dentin matrix obtained from three devices: BonMaker, Tooth Transformer, and Smart Dentin Grinder in regeneration of maxillary defects.

Research design: The study involved 39 patients with two-wall or three-wall defects who underwent bone augmentation procedures in the maxilla using dentin matrix grafts from the BonMaker, Tooth Transformer, and Smart Dentin Grinder devices. Histological examination was conducted on samples obtained from patients who received each device. In this article, histological samples have been selected and are presented.

Results: In all patients, bone defects were successfully augmented with ground dentin matrix. The histological examination revealed no inflammation and a good connection between the bone and dentin matrix and clinically all patients were qualified for implant placement.

Conclusions: After comparing the BonMaker, Tooth Transformer, and Smart Dentin Grinder devices in our practice, we concluded that all these systems have the potential for obtaining regenerative material from the patient's teeth.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

从不同设备获得的牙齿衍生生物材料的组织学检查。

目的：本研究的目的是研究不同设备处理的样本之间的组织学差异，并确认从BonMaker、Tooth Transformer和Smart dentin Grinder三种设备获得的不同牙本质基质在上颌缺损再生中的安全临床应用。研究设计：该研究涉及39名患有两壁或三壁缺陷的患者，他们使用BonMaker、Tooth Transformer和Smart dentin Grinder设备的牙本质基质移植物在上颌骨进行了骨增强手术。对从接受每种装置的患者身上获得的样本进行组织学检查。在这篇文章中，组织学样本已经被选择并呈现。结果：在所有患者中，骨缺损均成功地用磨碎的牙本质基质修复。组织学检查显示没有炎症，骨和牙本质基质之间有良好的连接，临床上所有患者都符合植入条件。结论：在比较了我们实践中的BonMaker、Tooth Transformer和Smart Dentin Grinder设备后，我们得出结论，所有这些系统都有可能从患者的牙齿中获得再生材料。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Expert Review of Medical Devices 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections: Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.